Cargando…

Final 5‐Year Report of the Randomized BIO‐RESORT Trial Comparing 3 Contemporary Drug‐Eluting Stents in All‐Comers

BACKGROUND: In a previous trial, higher 5‐year mortality was observed following treatment with biodegradable polymer Orsiro sirolimus‐eluting stents (SES). We assessed 5‐year safety and efficacy of all‐comers as well as patients with diabetes treated with SES or Synergy everolimus‐eluting stents (EE...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ploumen, Eline H., Pinxterhuis, Tineke H., Buiten, Rosaly A., Zocca, Paolo, Danse, Peter W., Schotborgh, Carl E., Scholte, Martijn, Gin, R. Melvyn Tjon Joe, Somi, Samer, van Houwelingen, K. Gert, Stoel, Martin G., de Man, H. A. F., Hartmann, Marc, Linssen, Gerard C. M., van der Heijden, Liefke C., Kok, Marlies M., Doggen, Carine J. M., von Birgelen, Clemens
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9750072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36346050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.122.026041
_version_ 1784850171329249280
author Ploumen, Eline H.
Pinxterhuis, Tineke H.
Buiten, Rosaly A.
Zocca, Paolo
Danse, Peter W.
Schotborgh, Carl E.
Scholte, Martijn
Gin, R. Melvyn Tjon Joe
Somi, Samer
van Houwelingen, K. Gert
Stoel, Martin G.
de Man, H. A. F.
Hartmann, Marc
Linssen, Gerard C. M.
van der Heijden, Liefke C.
Kok, Marlies M.
Doggen, Carine J. M.
von Birgelen, Clemens
author_facet Ploumen, Eline H.
Pinxterhuis, Tineke H.
Buiten, Rosaly A.
Zocca, Paolo
Danse, Peter W.
Schotborgh, Carl E.
Scholte, Martijn
Gin, R. Melvyn Tjon Joe
Somi, Samer
van Houwelingen, K. Gert
Stoel, Martin G.
de Man, H. A. F.
Hartmann, Marc
Linssen, Gerard C. M.
van der Heijden, Liefke C.
Kok, Marlies M.
Doggen, Carine J. M.
von Birgelen, Clemens
author_sort Ploumen, Eline H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In a previous trial, higher 5‐year mortality was observed following treatment with biodegradable polymer Orsiro sirolimus‐eluting stents (SES). We assessed 5‐year safety and efficacy of all‐comers as well as patients with diabetes treated with SES or Synergy everolimus‐eluting stents (EES) versus durable polymer Resolute Integrity zotarolimus‐eluting stents (ZES). METHODS AND RESULTS: The randomized BIO‐RESORT (Comparison of Biodegradable Polymer and Durable Polymer Drug‐Eluting Stents in an All Comers Population) trial enrolled 3514 all‐comer patients at 4 Dutch cardiac centers. Patients aged ≥18 years who required percutaneous coronary intervention were eligible. Participants were stratified for diabetes and randomized to treatment with SES, EES, or ZES (1:1:1). The main end point was target vessel failure (cardiac mortality, target vessel myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization). Five‐year follow‐up was available in 3183 of 3514 (90.6%) patients. The main end point target vessel failure occurred in 142 of 1169 (12.7%) patients treated with SES, 130 of 1172 (11.6%) treated with EES, versus 157 of 1173 (14.1%) treated with ZES (hazard ratio [HR], 0.89 [95% CI, 0.71–1.12], P (log‐rank)=0.31; and HR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.65–1.04], P (log‐rank)=0.10, respectively). Individual components of target vessel failure showed no significant between‐stent difference. Very late definite stent thrombosis rates were low and similar (SES, 1.1%; EES, 0.6%; ZES, 0.9%). In patients with diabetes, target vessel failure did not differ significantly between stent‐groups (SES, 19.8%; EES, 19.2%; versus ZES, 21.1% [P (log‐rank)=0.69 and P (log‐rank)=0.63]). CONCLUSIONS: Orsiro SES, Synergy EES, and Resolute Integrity ZES showed similar 5‐year outcomes of safety and efficacy, including mortality. A prespecified stent comparison in patients with diabetes also revealed no significant differences in 5‐year clinical outcomes. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01674803.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9750072
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97500722022-12-15 Final 5‐Year Report of the Randomized BIO‐RESORT Trial Comparing 3 Contemporary Drug‐Eluting Stents in All‐Comers Ploumen, Eline H. Pinxterhuis, Tineke H. Buiten, Rosaly A. Zocca, Paolo Danse, Peter W. Schotborgh, Carl E. Scholte, Martijn Gin, R. Melvyn Tjon Joe Somi, Samer van Houwelingen, K. Gert Stoel, Martin G. de Man, H. A. F. Hartmann, Marc Linssen, Gerard C. M. van der Heijden, Liefke C. Kok, Marlies M. Doggen, Carine J. M. von Birgelen, Clemens J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: In a previous trial, higher 5‐year mortality was observed following treatment with biodegradable polymer Orsiro sirolimus‐eluting stents (SES). We assessed 5‐year safety and efficacy of all‐comers as well as patients with diabetes treated with SES or Synergy everolimus‐eluting stents (EES) versus durable polymer Resolute Integrity zotarolimus‐eluting stents (ZES). METHODS AND RESULTS: The randomized BIO‐RESORT (Comparison of Biodegradable Polymer and Durable Polymer Drug‐Eluting Stents in an All Comers Population) trial enrolled 3514 all‐comer patients at 4 Dutch cardiac centers. Patients aged ≥18 years who required percutaneous coronary intervention were eligible. Participants were stratified for diabetes and randomized to treatment with SES, EES, or ZES (1:1:1). The main end point was target vessel failure (cardiac mortality, target vessel myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization). Five‐year follow‐up was available in 3183 of 3514 (90.6%) patients. The main end point target vessel failure occurred in 142 of 1169 (12.7%) patients treated with SES, 130 of 1172 (11.6%) treated with EES, versus 157 of 1173 (14.1%) treated with ZES (hazard ratio [HR], 0.89 [95% CI, 0.71–1.12], P (log‐rank)=0.31; and HR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.65–1.04], P (log‐rank)=0.10, respectively). Individual components of target vessel failure showed no significant between‐stent difference. Very late definite stent thrombosis rates were low and similar (SES, 1.1%; EES, 0.6%; ZES, 0.9%). In patients with diabetes, target vessel failure did not differ significantly between stent‐groups (SES, 19.8%; EES, 19.2%; versus ZES, 21.1% [P (log‐rank)=0.69 and P (log‐rank)=0.63]). CONCLUSIONS: Orsiro SES, Synergy EES, and Resolute Integrity ZES showed similar 5‐year outcomes of safety and efficacy, including mortality. A prespecified stent comparison in patients with diabetes also revealed no significant differences in 5‐year clinical outcomes. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01674803. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9750072/ /pubmed/36346050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.122.026041 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research
Ploumen, Eline H.
Pinxterhuis, Tineke H.
Buiten, Rosaly A.
Zocca, Paolo
Danse, Peter W.
Schotborgh, Carl E.
Scholte, Martijn
Gin, R. Melvyn Tjon Joe
Somi, Samer
van Houwelingen, K. Gert
Stoel, Martin G.
de Man, H. A. F.
Hartmann, Marc
Linssen, Gerard C. M.
van der Heijden, Liefke C.
Kok, Marlies M.
Doggen, Carine J. M.
von Birgelen, Clemens
Final 5‐Year Report of the Randomized BIO‐RESORT Trial Comparing 3 Contemporary Drug‐Eluting Stents in All‐Comers
title Final 5‐Year Report of the Randomized BIO‐RESORT Trial Comparing 3 Contemporary Drug‐Eluting Stents in All‐Comers
title_full Final 5‐Year Report of the Randomized BIO‐RESORT Trial Comparing 3 Contemporary Drug‐Eluting Stents in All‐Comers
title_fullStr Final 5‐Year Report of the Randomized BIO‐RESORT Trial Comparing 3 Contemporary Drug‐Eluting Stents in All‐Comers
title_full_unstemmed Final 5‐Year Report of the Randomized BIO‐RESORT Trial Comparing 3 Contemporary Drug‐Eluting Stents in All‐Comers
title_short Final 5‐Year Report of the Randomized BIO‐RESORT Trial Comparing 3 Contemporary Drug‐Eluting Stents in All‐Comers
title_sort final 5‐year report of the randomized bio‐resort trial comparing 3 contemporary drug‐eluting stents in all‐comers
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9750072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36346050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.122.026041
work_keys_str_mv AT ploumenelineh final5yearreportoftherandomizedbioresorttrialcomparing3contemporarydrugelutingstentsinallcomers
AT pinxterhuistinekeh final5yearreportoftherandomizedbioresorttrialcomparing3contemporarydrugelutingstentsinallcomers
AT buitenrosalya final5yearreportoftherandomizedbioresorttrialcomparing3contemporarydrugelutingstentsinallcomers
AT zoccapaolo final5yearreportoftherandomizedbioresorttrialcomparing3contemporarydrugelutingstentsinallcomers
AT dansepeterw final5yearreportoftherandomizedbioresorttrialcomparing3contemporarydrugelutingstentsinallcomers
AT schotborghcarle final5yearreportoftherandomizedbioresorttrialcomparing3contemporarydrugelutingstentsinallcomers
AT scholtemartijn final5yearreportoftherandomizedbioresorttrialcomparing3contemporarydrugelutingstentsinallcomers
AT ginrmelvyntjonjoe final5yearreportoftherandomizedbioresorttrialcomparing3contemporarydrugelutingstentsinallcomers
AT somisamer final5yearreportoftherandomizedbioresorttrialcomparing3contemporarydrugelutingstentsinallcomers
AT vanhouwelingenkgert final5yearreportoftherandomizedbioresorttrialcomparing3contemporarydrugelutingstentsinallcomers
AT stoelmarting final5yearreportoftherandomizedbioresorttrialcomparing3contemporarydrugelutingstentsinallcomers
AT demanhaf final5yearreportoftherandomizedbioresorttrialcomparing3contemporarydrugelutingstentsinallcomers
AT hartmannmarc final5yearreportoftherandomizedbioresorttrialcomparing3contemporarydrugelutingstentsinallcomers
AT linssengerardcm final5yearreportoftherandomizedbioresorttrialcomparing3contemporarydrugelutingstentsinallcomers
AT vanderheijdenliefkec final5yearreportoftherandomizedbioresorttrialcomparing3contemporarydrugelutingstentsinallcomers
AT kokmarliesm final5yearreportoftherandomizedbioresorttrialcomparing3contemporarydrugelutingstentsinallcomers
AT doggencarinejm final5yearreportoftherandomizedbioresorttrialcomparing3contemporarydrugelutingstentsinallcomers
AT vonbirgelenclemens final5yearreportoftherandomizedbioresorttrialcomparing3contemporarydrugelutingstentsinallcomers