Cargando…

Pediatric Electrophysiology Device Needs: A Survey from the Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society Taskforce on Pediatric‐Specific Devices

BACKGROUND: There are few US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)–approved devices specifically aimed at the pediatric patient with arrhythmia. This has led to a high off‐label utilization of devices in this vulnerable population. The Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society (PACES), the int...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dubin, Anne M., Bar‐Cohen, Yaniv, Berul, Charles I., Cannon, Bryan C., Saarel, Elizabeth V., Shah, Maully J., Triedman, John K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9750079/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36326051
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.122.026904
_version_ 1784850173020602368
author Dubin, Anne M.
Bar‐Cohen, Yaniv
Berul, Charles I.
Cannon, Bryan C.
Saarel, Elizabeth V.
Shah, Maully J.
Triedman, John K.
author_facet Dubin, Anne M.
Bar‐Cohen, Yaniv
Berul, Charles I.
Cannon, Bryan C.
Saarel, Elizabeth V.
Shah, Maully J.
Triedman, John K.
author_sort Dubin, Anne M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There are few US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)–approved devices specifically aimed at the pediatric patient with arrhythmia. This has led to a high off‐label utilization of devices in this vulnerable population. The Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society (PACES), the international organization representing pediatric and congenital heart disease arrhythmia specialists, developed a task force to comprehensively address device development issues relevant to pediatric patients with congenital arrhythmia. METHODS AND RESULTS: As a first step, the taskforce developed a 26‐question survey for the pediatric arrhythmia community to assess providers’ understanding of the FDA approval process, specifically in regard to pediatric labeling. There were 92/211 respondents (44%) with a >90% completion rate. The vast majority of respondents believed there was a paucity of devices available for children (96%). More than 60% of respondents stated that they did not understand the FDA regulatory process and were not aware of whether the devices they used were labeled for pediatric use. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric electrophysiologists are keenly aware of the deficit of available pediatric devices for their patients. The majority do not understand the FDA approval process and could benefit from additional educational resources regarding this. A collaborative forum including PACES, FDA, patients and their families, and Industry would be an important next step in clarifying opportunities and priorities to serve this vulnerable population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9750079
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97500792022-12-15 Pediatric Electrophysiology Device Needs: A Survey from the Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society Taskforce on Pediatric‐Specific Devices Dubin, Anne M. Bar‐Cohen, Yaniv Berul, Charles I. Cannon, Bryan C. Saarel, Elizabeth V. Shah, Maully J. Triedman, John K. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: There are few US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)–approved devices specifically aimed at the pediatric patient with arrhythmia. This has led to a high off‐label utilization of devices in this vulnerable population. The Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society (PACES), the international organization representing pediatric and congenital heart disease arrhythmia specialists, developed a task force to comprehensively address device development issues relevant to pediatric patients with congenital arrhythmia. METHODS AND RESULTS: As a first step, the taskforce developed a 26‐question survey for the pediatric arrhythmia community to assess providers’ understanding of the FDA approval process, specifically in regard to pediatric labeling. There were 92/211 respondents (44%) with a >90% completion rate. The vast majority of respondents believed there was a paucity of devices available for children (96%). More than 60% of respondents stated that they did not understand the FDA regulatory process and were not aware of whether the devices they used were labeled for pediatric use. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric electrophysiologists are keenly aware of the deficit of available pediatric devices for their patients. The majority do not understand the FDA approval process and could benefit from additional educational resources regarding this. A collaborative forum including PACES, FDA, patients and their families, and Industry would be an important next step in clarifying opportunities and priorities to serve this vulnerable population. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9750079/ /pubmed/36326051 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.122.026904 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Dubin, Anne M.
Bar‐Cohen, Yaniv
Berul, Charles I.
Cannon, Bryan C.
Saarel, Elizabeth V.
Shah, Maully J.
Triedman, John K.
Pediatric Electrophysiology Device Needs: A Survey from the Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society Taskforce on Pediatric‐Specific Devices
title Pediatric Electrophysiology Device Needs: A Survey from the Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society Taskforce on Pediatric‐Specific Devices
title_full Pediatric Electrophysiology Device Needs: A Survey from the Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society Taskforce on Pediatric‐Specific Devices
title_fullStr Pediatric Electrophysiology Device Needs: A Survey from the Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society Taskforce on Pediatric‐Specific Devices
title_full_unstemmed Pediatric Electrophysiology Device Needs: A Survey from the Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society Taskforce on Pediatric‐Specific Devices
title_short Pediatric Electrophysiology Device Needs: A Survey from the Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society Taskforce on Pediatric‐Specific Devices
title_sort pediatric electrophysiology device needs: a survey from the pediatric and congenital electrophysiology society taskforce on pediatric‐specific devices
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9750079/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36326051
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.122.026904
work_keys_str_mv AT dubinannem pediatricelectrophysiologydeviceneedsasurveyfromthepediatricandcongenitalelectrophysiologysocietytaskforceonpediatricspecificdevices
AT barcohenyaniv pediatricelectrophysiologydeviceneedsasurveyfromthepediatricandcongenitalelectrophysiologysocietytaskforceonpediatricspecificdevices
AT berulcharlesi pediatricelectrophysiologydeviceneedsasurveyfromthepediatricandcongenitalelectrophysiologysocietytaskforceonpediatricspecificdevices
AT cannonbryanc pediatricelectrophysiologydeviceneedsasurveyfromthepediatricandcongenitalelectrophysiologysocietytaskforceonpediatricspecificdevices
AT saarelelizabethv pediatricelectrophysiologydeviceneedsasurveyfromthepediatricandcongenitalelectrophysiologysocietytaskforceonpediatricspecificdevices
AT shahmaullyj pediatricelectrophysiologydeviceneedsasurveyfromthepediatricandcongenitalelectrophysiologysocietytaskforceonpediatricspecificdevices
AT triedmanjohnk pediatricelectrophysiologydeviceneedsasurveyfromthepediatricandcongenitalelectrophysiologysocietytaskforceonpediatricspecificdevices