Cargando…
Efficacy and toxicity of three concurrent chemoradiotherapy regimens in treating nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Comparison among cisplatin, nedaplatin, and lobaplatin
Few studies directly compare efficacy and toxicity among lobaplatin, nedaplatin and cisplatin concurrently with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Totally 141 treatment-naïve NPC without distant metastasis receiving IMRT concurrent with cisplatin or nedaplatin...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9750602/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36626436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000031187 |
_version_ | 1784850291668025344 |
---|---|
author | Liang, Xuexia Liu, Qiaodan Yao, Wei Yang, Shuai |
author_facet | Liang, Xuexia Liu, Qiaodan Yao, Wei Yang, Shuai |
author_sort | Liang, Xuexia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Few studies directly compare efficacy and toxicity among lobaplatin, nedaplatin and cisplatin concurrently with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Totally 141 treatment-naïve NPC without distant metastasis receiving IMRT concurrent with cisplatin or nedaplatin or lobaplatin were retrospectively enrolled. Their response rate, toxicity and long-term survival were compared. Complete response (CR) rates of concurrent lobaplatin (CR-nasopharynx [CR-nx], 82.7%; CR-cervical lymph node [CR-nd], 94.2%) were lower than those of cisplatin (CR-nx, 89.3%; CR-nd, 98.2%) and nedaplatin (CR-nx, 93.9%; CR-nd, 97.0%), but statistical significance wasn’t detected. Estimated five-year overall survival (OS), local relapse-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) weren’t statistically significant between three groups. Multivariable analysis by COX proportional hazards model showed concurrent chemotherapy regimen wasn’t an independent prognostic factor. Gastrointestinal toxicity was prevalent in platinum-based concurrent chemotherapy; cisplatin group suffered heavier (≥grade 2) than other two groups. More nephrotoxicity happened in cisplatin group (17.9%) than nedaplatin (9.1%) and lobaplatin (2.0%) groups. Incidence of dermatitis of ≥grade 2 was higher in cisplatin group (60.7%) than nedaplatin (27.3%) and lobaplatin (9.6%) groups. More patients in lobaplatin and nedaplatin groups suffered from any grade thrombocytopenia (P < .001), but incidence of severe thrombocytopenia (≥grade 3) was similar. Economic cost was significant less in lobaplatin group. Cisplatin, nedaplatin and lobaplatin are equally effective when used concurrently with IMRT in NPC. Lobaplatin and nedaplatin have potential to be alternatives to cisplatin in terms of less severe acute side-effects and economic cost. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9750602 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97506022022-12-28 Efficacy and toxicity of three concurrent chemoradiotherapy regimens in treating nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Comparison among cisplatin, nedaplatin, and lobaplatin Liang, Xuexia Liu, Qiaodan Yao, Wei Yang, Shuai Medicine (Baltimore) 5700 Few studies directly compare efficacy and toxicity among lobaplatin, nedaplatin and cisplatin concurrently with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Totally 141 treatment-naïve NPC without distant metastasis receiving IMRT concurrent with cisplatin or nedaplatin or lobaplatin were retrospectively enrolled. Their response rate, toxicity and long-term survival were compared. Complete response (CR) rates of concurrent lobaplatin (CR-nasopharynx [CR-nx], 82.7%; CR-cervical lymph node [CR-nd], 94.2%) were lower than those of cisplatin (CR-nx, 89.3%; CR-nd, 98.2%) and nedaplatin (CR-nx, 93.9%; CR-nd, 97.0%), but statistical significance wasn’t detected. Estimated five-year overall survival (OS), local relapse-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) weren’t statistically significant between three groups. Multivariable analysis by COX proportional hazards model showed concurrent chemotherapy regimen wasn’t an independent prognostic factor. Gastrointestinal toxicity was prevalent in platinum-based concurrent chemotherapy; cisplatin group suffered heavier (≥grade 2) than other two groups. More nephrotoxicity happened in cisplatin group (17.9%) than nedaplatin (9.1%) and lobaplatin (2.0%) groups. Incidence of dermatitis of ≥grade 2 was higher in cisplatin group (60.7%) than nedaplatin (27.3%) and lobaplatin (9.6%) groups. More patients in lobaplatin and nedaplatin groups suffered from any grade thrombocytopenia (P < .001), but incidence of severe thrombocytopenia (≥grade 3) was similar. Economic cost was significant less in lobaplatin group. Cisplatin, nedaplatin and lobaplatin are equally effective when used concurrently with IMRT in NPC. Lobaplatin and nedaplatin have potential to be alternatives to cisplatin in terms of less severe acute side-effects and economic cost. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9750602/ /pubmed/36626436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000031187 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | 5700 Liang, Xuexia Liu, Qiaodan Yao, Wei Yang, Shuai Efficacy and toxicity of three concurrent chemoradiotherapy regimens in treating nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Comparison among cisplatin, nedaplatin, and lobaplatin |
title | Efficacy and toxicity of three concurrent chemoradiotherapy regimens in treating nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Comparison among cisplatin, nedaplatin, and lobaplatin |
title_full | Efficacy and toxicity of three concurrent chemoradiotherapy regimens in treating nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Comparison among cisplatin, nedaplatin, and lobaplatin |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and toxicity of three concurrent chemoradiotherapy regimens in treating nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Comparison among cisplatin, nedaplatin, and lobaplatin |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and toxicity of three concurrent chemoradiotherapy regimens in treating nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Comparison among cisplatin, nedaplatin, and lobaplatin |
title_short | Efficacy and toxicity of three concurrent chemoradiotherapy regimens in treating nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Comparison among cisplatin, nedaplatin, and lobaplatin |
title_sort | efficacy and toxicity of three concurrent chemoradiotherapy regimens in treating nasopharyngeal carcinoma: comparison among cisplatin, nedaplatin, and lobaplatin |
topic | 5700 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9750602/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36626436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000031187 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liangxuexia efficacyandtoxicityofthreeconcurrentchemoradiotherapyregimensintreatingnasopharyngealcarcinomacomparisonamongcisplatinnedaplatinandlobaplatin AT liuqiaodan efficacyandtoxicityofthreeconcurrentchemoradiotherapyregimensintreatingnasopharyngealcarcinomacomparisonamongcisplatinnedaplatinandlobaplatin AT yaowei efficacyandtoxicityofthreeconcurrentchemoradiotherapyregimensintreatingnasopharyngealcarcinomacomparisonamongcisplatinnedaplatinandlobaplatin AT yangshuai efficacyandtoxicityofthreeconcurrentchemoradiotherapyregimensintreatingnasopharyngealcarcinomacomparisonamongcisplatinnedaplatinandlobaplatin |