Cargando…

Efficacy and toxicity of three concurrent chemoradiotherapy regimens in treating nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Comparison among cisplatin, nedaplatin, and lobaplatin

Few studies directly compare efficacy and toxicity among lobaplatin, nedaplatin and cisplatin concurrently with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Totally 141 treatment-naïve NPC without distant metastasis receiving IMRT concurrent with cisplatin or nedaplatin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liang, Xuexia, Liu, Qiaodan, Yao, Wei, Yang, Shuai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9750602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36626436
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000031187
_version_ 1784850291668025344
author Liang, Xuexia
Liu, Qiaodan
Yao, Wei
Yang, Shuai
author_facet Liang, Xuexia
Liu, Qiaodan
Yao, Wei
Yang, Shuai
author_sort Liang, Xuexia
collection PubMed
description Few studies directly compare efficacy and toxicity among lobaplatin, nedaplatin and cisplatin concurrently with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Totally 141 treatment-naïve NPC without distant metastasis receiving IMRT concurrent with cisplatin or nedaplatin or lobaplatin were retrospectively enrolled. Their response rate, toxicity and long-term survival were compared. Complete response (CR) rates of concurrent lobaplatin (CR-nasopharynx [CR-nx], 82.7%; CR-cervical lymph node [CR-nd], 94.2%) were lower than those of cisplatin (CR-nx, 89.3%; CR-nd, 98.2%) and nedaplatin (CR-nx, 93.9%; CR-nd, 97.0%), but statistical significance wasn’t detected. Estimated five-year overall survival (OS), local relapse-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) weren’t statistically significant between three groups. Multivariable analysis by COX proportional hazards model showed concurrent chemotherapy regimen wasn’t an independent prognostic factor. Gastrointestinal toxicity was prevalent in platinum-based concurrent chemotherapy; cisplatin group suffered heavier (≥grade 2) than other two groups. More nephrotoxicity happened in cisplatin group (17.9%) than nedaplatin (9.1%) and lobaplatin (2.0%) groups. Incidence of dermatitis of ≥grade 2 was higher in cisplatin group (60.7%) than nedaplatin (27.3%) and lobaplatin (9.6%) groups. More patients in lobaplatin and nedaplatin groups suffered from any grade thrombocytopenia (P < .001), but incidence of severe thrombocytopenia (≥grade 3) was similar. Economic cost was significant less in lobaplatin group. Cisplatin, nedaplatin and lobaplatin are equally effective when used concurrently with IMRT in NPC. Lobaplatin and nedaplatin have potential to be alternatives to cisplatin in terms of less severe acute side-effects and economic cost.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9750602
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97506022022-12-28 Efficacy and toxicity of three concurrent chemoradiotherapy regimens in treating nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Comparison among cisplatin, nedaplatin, and lobaplatin Liang, Xuexia Liu, Qiaodan Yao, Wei Yang, Shuai Medicine (Baltimore) 5700 Few studies directly compare efficacy and toxicity among lobaplatin, nedaplatin and cisplatin concurrently with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Totally 141 treatment-naïve NPC without distant metastasis receiving IMRT concurrent with cisplatin or nedaplatin or lobaplatin were retrospectively enrolled. Their response rate, toxicity and long-term survival were compared. Complete response (CR) rates of concurrent lobaplatin (CR-nasopharynx [CR-nx], 82.7%; CR-cervical lymph node [CR-nd], 94.2%) were lower than those of cisplatin (CR-nx, 89.3%; CR-nd, 98.2%) and nedaplatin (CR-nx, 93.9%; CR-nd, 97.0%), but statistical significance wasn’t detected. Estimated five-year overall survival (OS), local relapse-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) weren’t statistically significant between three groups. Multivariable analysis by COX proportional hazards model showed concurrent chemotherapy regimen wasn’t an independent prognostic factor. Gastrointestinal toxicity was prevalent in platinum-based concurrent chemotherapy; cisplatin group suffered heavier (≥grade 2) than other two groups. More nephrotoxicity happened in cisplatin group (17.9%) than nedaplatin (9.1%) and lobaplatin (2.0%) groups. Incidence of dermatitis of ≥grade 2 was higher in cisplatin group (60.7%) than nedaplatin (27.3%) and lobaplatin (9.6%) groups. More patients in lobaplatin and nedaplatin groups suffered from any grade thrombocytopenia (P < .001), but incidence of severe thrombocytopenia (≥grade 3) was similar. Economic cost was significant less in lobaplatin group. Cisplatin, nedaplatin and lobaplatin are equally effective when used concurrently with IMRT in NPC. Lobaplatin and nedaplatin have potential to be alternatives to cisplatin in terms of less severe acute side-effects and economic cost. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9750602/ /pubmed/36626436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000031187 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle 5700
Liang, Xuexia
Liu, Qiaodan
Yao, Wei
Yang, Shuai
Efficacy and toxicity of three concurrent chemoradiotherapy regimens in treating nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Comparison among cisplatin, nedaplatin, and lobaplatin
title Efficacy and toxicity of three concurrent chemoradiotherapy regimens in treating nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Comparison among cisplatin, nedaplatin, and lobaplatin
title_full Efficacy and toxicity of three concurrent chemoradiotherapy regimens in treating nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Comparison among cisplatin, nedaplatin, and lobaplatin
title_fullStr Efficacy and toxicity of three concurrent chemoradiotherapy regimens in treating nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Comparison among cisplatin, nedaplatin, and lobaplatin
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and toxicity of three concurrent chemoradiotherapy regimens in treating nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Comparison among cisplatin, nedaplatin, and lobaplatin
title_short Efficacy and toxicity of three concurrent chemoradiotherapy regimens in treating nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Comparison among cisplatin, nedaplatin, and lobaplatin
title_sort efficacy and toxicity of three concurrent chemoradiotherapy regimens in treating nasopharyngeal carcinoma: comparison among cisplatin, nedaplatin, and lobaplatin
topic 5700
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9750602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36626436
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000031187
work_keys_str_mv AT liangxuexia efficacyandtoxicityofthreeconcurrentchemoradiotherapyregimensintreatingnasopharyngealcarcinomacomparisonamongcisplatinnedaplatinandlobaplatin
AT liuqiaodan efficacyandtoxicityofthreeconcurrentchemoradiotherapyregimensintreatingnasopharyngealcarcinomacomparisonamongcisplatinnedaplatinandlobaplatin
AT yaowei efficacyandtoxicityofthreeconcurrentchemoradiotherapyregimensintreatingnasopharyngealcarcinomacomparisonamongcisplatinnedaplatinandlobaplatin
AT yangshuai efficacyandtoxicityofthreeconcurrentchemoradiotherapyregimensintreatingnasopharyngealcarcinomacomparisonamongcisplatinnedaplatinandlobaplatin