Cargando…

Perceptions and Early Outcomes of the Acuity Circles Allocation Policy Among Liver Transplant Centers in the United States

Recently, a new liver allocation policy called the acuity circles (AC) framework was implemented to decrease geographic disparities in transplant metrics across donor service areas. Early analyses have examined the changes in outcomes because of the AC policy. However, perceptions among transplant s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pawlak, Natalie, Song,, Cherilyn, Alvi, Saba, Schuster,, Kimberly, Segalini, Nicole, Kwon,, Yong K., Akoad, Mohamed E., Rauf, M. Ameen, Mulligan, David, Aziz,, Hassan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9750633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36582673
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001427
_version_ 1784850299000717312
author Pawlak, Natalie
Song,, Cherilyn
Alvi, Saba
Schuster,, Kimberly
Segalini, Nicole
Kwon,, Yong K.
Akoad, Mohamed E.
Rauf, M. Ameen
Mulligan, David
Aziz,, Hassan
author_facet Pawlak, Natalie
Song,, Cherilyn
Alvi, Saba
Schuster,, Kimberly
Segalini, Nicole
Kwon,, Yong K.
Akoad, Mohamed E.
Rauf, M. Ameen
Mulligan, David
Aziz,, Hassan
author_sort Pawlak, Natalie
collection PubMed
description Recently, a new liver allocation policy called the acuity circles (AC) framework was implemented to decrease geographic disparities in transplant metrics across donor service areas. Early analyses have examined the changes in outcomes because of the AC policy. However, perceptions among transplant surgeons and staff regarding the new policy remain unknown. METHODS. A 28-item survey was sent to division chiefs and surgical directors of liver transplantation across the United States. Questions assessed the respondents’ perceptions regarding center-level metrics and staff satisfaction. We used Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data to study differences in allocation between the pre-AC implementation period (2019) and the post-AC implementation period (2020–2021). RESULTS. A total of 40 participants completed this ongoing survey study. Most responses were from region 8 (13%), region 10 (15%), and region 11 (13%). Sixty-three percent of respondents stated that the wait time for a suitable offer for recipients with model of end-stage liver disease score <30 has decreased, whereas 50% stated that wait time for a suitable offer for recipients with model of end-stage liver disease score >30 has increased. However, most respondents (75%) felt that the average cost per transplant had increased and that the rate of surgical complications and 1-y graft survival had remained the same. In most states, an observable decrease in in-state liver transplantations occurred each year between 2019 and 2021. In addition, most allocation regions reported an increase in donations after circulatory deaths between 2019 and 2021. CONCLUSIONS. Perceptions of the new AC policy among liver transplant surgeons in the United States remain mixed, highlighting the potential strengths and concerns regarding its future impact. Further studies should assess the effects of the AC policy on clinical outcomes and liver transplantation access.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9750633
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97506332022-12-28 Perceptions and Early Outcomes of the Acuity Circles Allocation Policy Among Liver Transplant Centers in the United States Pawlak, Natalie Song,, Cherilyn Alvi, Saba Schuster,, Kimberly Segalini, Nicole Kwon,, Yong K. Akoad, Mohamed E. Rauf, M. Ameen Mulligan, David Aziz,, Hassan Transplant Direct Liver Transplantation Recently, a new liver allocation policy called the acuity circles (AC) framework was implemented to decrease geographic disparities in transplant metrics across donor service areas. Early analyses have examined the changes in outcomes because of the AC policy. However, perceptions among transplant surgeons and staff regarding the new policy remain unknown. METHODS. A 28-item survey was sent to division chiefs and surgical directors of liver transplantation across the United States. Questions assessed the respondents’ perceptions regarding center-level metrics and staff satisfaction. We used Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data to study differences in allocation between the pre-AC implementation period (2019) and the post-AC implementation period (2020–2021). RESULTS. A total of 40 participants completed this ongoing survey study. Most responses were from region 8 (13%), region 10 (15%), and region 11 (13%). Sixty-three percent of respondents stated that the wait time for a suitable offer for recipients with model of end-stage liver disease score <30 has decreased, whereas 50% stated that wait time for a suitable offer for recipients with model of end-stage liver disease score >30 has increased. However, most respondents (75%) felt that the average cost per transplant had increased and that the rate of surgical complications and 1-y graft survival had remained the same. In most states, an observable decrease in in-state liver transplantations occurred each year between 2019 and 2021. In addition, most allocation regions reported an increase in donations after circulatory deaths between 2019 and 2021. CONCLUSIONS. Perceptions of the new AC policy among liver transplant surgeons in the United States remain mixed, highlighting the potential strengths and concerns regarding its future impact. Further studies should assess the effects of the AC policy on clinical outcomes and liver transplantation access. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9750633/ /pubmed/36582673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001427 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Transplantation Direct. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Liver Transplantation
Pawlak, Natalie
Song,, Cherilyn
Alvi, Saba
Schuster,, Kimberly
Segalini, Nicole
Kwon,, Yong K.
Akoad, Mohamed E.
Rauf, M. Ameen
Mulligan, David
Aziz,, Hassan
Perceptions and Early Outcomes of the Acuity Circles Allocation Policy Among Liver Transplant Centers in the United States
title Perceptions and Early Outcomes of the Acuity Circles Allocation Policy Among Liver Transplant Centers in the United States
title_full Perceptions and Early Outcomes of the Acuity Circles Allocation Policy Among Liver Transplant Centers in the United States
title_fullStr Perceptions and Early Outcomes of the Acuity Circles Allocation Policy Among Liver Transplant Centers in the United States
title_full_unstemmed Perceptions and Early Outcomes of the Acuity Circles Allocation Policy Among Liver Transplant Centers in the United States
title_short Perceptions and Early Outcomes of the Acuity Circles Allocation Policy Among Liver Transplant Centers in the United States
title_sort perceptions and early outcomes of the acuity circles allocation policy among liver transplant centers in the united states
topic Liver Transplantation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9750633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36582673
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001427
work_keys_str_mv AT pawlaknatalie perceptionsandearlyoutcomesoftheacuitycirclesallocationpolicyamonglivertransplantcentersintheunitedstates
AT songcherilyn perceptionsandearlyoutcomesoftheacuitycirclesallocationpolicyamonglivertransplantcentersintheunitedstates
AT alvisaba perceptionsandearlyoutcomesoftheacuitycirclesallocationpolicyamonglivertransplantcentersintheunitedstates
AT schusterkimberly perceptionsandearlyoutcomesoftheacuitycirclesallocationpolicyamonglivertransplantcentersintheunitedstates
AT segalininicole perceptionsandearlyoutcomesoftheacuitycirclesallocationpolicyamonglivertransplantcentersintheunitedstates
AT kwonyongk perceptionsandearlyoutcomesoftheacuitycirclesallocationpolicyamonglivertransplantcentersintheunitedstates
AT akoadmohamede perceptionsandearlyoutcomesoftheacuitycirclesallocationpolicyamonglivertransplantcentersintheunitedstates
AT raufmameen perceptionsandearlyoutcomesoftheacuitycirclesallocationpolicyamonglivertransplantcentersintheunitedstates
AT mulligandavid perceptionsandearlyoutcomesoftheacuitycirclesallocationpolicyamonglivertransplantcentersintheunitedstates
AT azizhassan perceptionsandearlyoutcomesoftheacuitycirclesallocationpolicyamonglivertransplantcentersintheunitedstates