Cargando…
Perceptions and Early Outcomes of the Acuity Circles Allocation Policy Among Liver Transplant Centers in the United States
Recently, a new liver allocation policy called the acuity circles (AC) framework was implemented to decrease geographic disparities in transplant metrics across donor service areas. Early analyses have examined the changes in outcomes because of the AC policy. However, perceptions among transplant s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9750633/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36582673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001427 |
_version_ | 1784850299000717312 |
---|---|
author | Pawlak, Natalie Song,, Cherilyn Alvi, Saba Schuster,, Kimberly Segalini, Nicole Kwon,, Yong K. Akoad, Mohamed E. Rauf, M. Ameen Mulligan, David Aziz,, Hassan |
author_facet | Pawlak, Natalie Song,, Cherilyn Alvi, Saba Schuster,, Kimberly Segalini, Nicole Kwon,, Yong K. Akoad, Mohamed E. Rauf, M. Ameen Mulligan, David Aziz,, Hassan |
author_sort | Pawlak, Natalie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recently, a new liver allocation policy called the acuity circles (AC) framework was implemented to decrease geographic disparities in transplant metrics across donor service areas. Early analyses have examined the changes in outcomes because of the AC policy. However, perceptions among transplant surgeons and staff regarding the new policy remain unknown. METHODS. A 28-item survey was sent to division chiefs and surgical directors of liver transplantation across the United States. Questions assessed the respondents’ perceptions regarding center-level metrics and staff satisfaction. We used Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data to study differences in allocation between the pre-AC implementation period (2019) and the post-AC implementation period (2020–2021). RESULTS. A total of 40 participants completed this ongoing survey study. Most responses were from region 8 (13%), region 10 (15%), and region 11 (13%). Sixty-three percent of respondents stated that the wait time for a suitable offer for recipients with model of end-stage liver disease score <30 has decreased, whereas 50% stated that wait time for a suitable offer for recipients with model of end-stage liver disease score >30 has increased. However, most respondents (75%) felt that the average cost per transplant had increased and that the rate of surgical complications and 1-y graft survival had remained the same. In most states, an observable decrease in in-state liver transplantations occurred each year between 2019 and 2021. In addition, most allocation regions reported an increase in donations after circulatory deaths between 2019 and 2021. CONCLUSIONS. Perceptions of the new AC policy among liver transplant surgeons in the United States remain mixed, highlighting the potential strengths and concerns regarding its future impact. Further studies should assess the effects of the AC policy on clinical outcomes and liver transplantation access. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9750633 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97506332022-12-28 Perceptions and Early Outcomes of the Acuity Circles Allocation Policy Among Liver Transplant Centers in the United States Pawlak, Natalie Song,, Cherilyn Alvi, Saba Schuster,, Kimberly Segalini, Nicole Kwon,, Yong K. Akoad, Mohamed E. Rauf, M. Ameen Mulligan, David Aziz,, Hassan Transplant Direct Liver Transplantation Recently, a new liver allocation policy called the acuity circles (AC) framework was implemented to decrease geographic disparities in transplant metrics across donor service areas. Early analyses have examined the changes in outcomes because of the AC policy. However, perceptions among transplant surgeons and staff regarding the new policy remain unknown. METHODS. A 28-item survey was sent to division chiefs and surgical directors of liver transplantation across the United States. Questions assessed the respondents’ perceptions regarding center-level metrics and staff satisfaction. We used Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data to study differences in allocation between the pre-AC implementation period (2019) and the post-AC implementation period (2020–2021). RESULTS. A total of 40 participants completed this ongoing survey study. Most responses were from region 8 (13%), region 10 (15%), and region 11 (13%). Sixty-three percent of respondents stated that the wait time for a suitable offer for recipients with model of end-stage liver disease score <30 has decreased, whereas 50% stated that wait time for a suitable offer for recipients with model of end-stage liver disease score >30 has increased. However, most respondents (75%) felt that the average cost per transplant had increased and that the rate of surgical complications and 1-y graft survival had remained the same. In most states, an observable decrease in in-state liver transplantations occurred each year between 2019 and 2021. In addition, most allocation regions reported an increase in donations after circulatory deaths between 2019 and 2021. CONCLUSIONS. Perceptions of the new AC policy among liver transplant surgeons in the United States remain mixed, highlighting the potential strengths and concerns regarding its future impact. Further studies should assess the effects of the AC policy on clinical outcomes and liver transplantation access. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9750633/ /pubmed/36582673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001427 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Transplantation Direct. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Liver Transplantation Pawlak, Natalie Song,, Cherilyn Alvi, Saba Schuster,, Kimberly Segalini, Nicole Kwon,, Yong K. Akoad, Mohamed E. Rauf, M. Ameen Mulligan, David Aziz,, Hassan Perceptions and Early Outcomes of the Acuity Circles Allocation Policy Among Liver Transplant Centers in the United States |
title | Perceptions and Early Outcomes of the Acuity Circles Allocation Policy Among Liver Transplant Centers in the United States |
title_full | Perceptions and Early Outcomes of the Acuity Circles Allocation Policy Among Liver Transplant Centers in the United States |
title_fullStr | Perceptions and Early Outcomes of the Acuity Circles Allocation Policy Among Liver Transplant Centers in the United States |
title_full_unstemmed | Perceptions and Early Outcomes of the Acuity Circles Allocation Policy Among Liver Transplant Centers in the United States |
title_short | Perceptions and Early Outcomes of the Acuity Circles Allocation Policy Among Liver Transplant Centers in the United States |
title_sort | perceptions and early outcomes of the acuity circles allocation policy among liver transplant centers in the united states |
topic | Liver Transplantation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9750633/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36582673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001427 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pawlaknatalie perceptionsandearlyoutcomesoftheacuitycirclesallocationpolicyamonglivertransplantcentersintheunitedstates AT songcherilyn perceptionsandearlyoutcomesoftheacuitycirclesallocationpolicyamonglivertransplantcentersintheunitedstates AT alvisaba perceptionsandearlyoutcomesoftheacuitycirclesallocationpolicyamonglivertransplantcentersintheunitedstates AT schusterkimberly perceptionsandearlyoutcomesoftheacuitycirclesallocationpolicyamonglivertransplantcentersintheunitedstates AT segalininicole perceptionsandearlyoutcomesoftheacuitycirclesallocationpolicyamonglivertransplantcentersintheunitedstates AT kwonyongk perceptionsandearlyoutcomesoftheacuitycirclesallocationpolicyamonglivertransplantcentersintheunitedstates AT akoadmohamede perceptionsandearlyoutcomesoftheacuitycirclesallocationpolicyamonglivertransplantcentersintheunitedstates AT raufmameen perceptionsandearlyoutcomesoftheacuitycirclesallocationpolicyamonglivertransplantcentersintheunitedstates AT mulligandavid perceptionsandearlyoutcomesoftheacuitycirclesallocationpolicyamonglivertransplantcentersintheunitedstates AT azizhassan perceptionsandearlyoutcomesoftheacuitycirclesallocationpolicyamonglivertransplantcentersintheunitedstates |