Cargando…

Modelling the evolution of novelty: a review

Evolution has been an inventive process since its inception, about 4 billion years ago. It has generated an astounding diversity of novel mechanisms and structures for adaptation to the environment, for competition and cooperation, and for organisation of the internal and external dynamics of the or...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Colizzi, Enrico Sandro, Hogeweg, Paulien, Vroomans, Renske M.A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Portland Press Ltd. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9750852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36468669
http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/EBC20220069
_version_ 1784850347448074240
author Colizzi, Enrico Sandro
Hogeweg, Paulien
Vroomans, Renske M.A.
author_facet Colizzi, Enrico Sandro
Hogeweg, Paulien
Vroomans, Renske M.A.
author_sort Colizzi, Enrico Sandro
collection PubMed
description Evolution has been an inventive process since its inception, about 4 billion years ago. It has generated an astounding diversity of novel mechanisms and structures for adaptation to the environment, for competition and cooperation, and for organisation of the internal and external dynamics of the organism. How does this novelty come about? Evolution builds with the tools available, and on top of what it has already built – therefore, much novelty consists in repurposing old functions in a different context. In the process, the tools themselves evolve, allowing yet more novelty to arise. Despite evolutionary novelty being the most striking observable of evolution, it is not accounted for in classical evolutionary theory. Nevertheless, mathematical and computational models that illustrate mechanisms of evolutionary innovation have been developed. In the present review, we present and compare several examples of computational evo–devo models that capture two aspects of novelty: ‘between-level novelty’ and ‘constructive novelty.’ Novelty can evolve between predefined levels of organisation to dynamically transcode biological information across these levels – as occurs during development. Constructive novelty instead generates a level of biological organisation by exploiting the lower level as an informational scaffold to open a new space of possibilities – an example being the evolution of multicellularity. We propose that the field of computational evo–devo is well-poised to reveal many more exciting mechanisms for the evolution of novelty. A broader theory of evolutionary novelty may well be attainable in the near future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9750852
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Portland Press Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97508522022-12-21 Modelling the evolution of novelty: a review Colizzi, Enrico Sandro Hogeweg, Paulien Vroomans, Renske M.A. Essays Biochem Evolutionary Biology Evolution has been an inventive process since its inception, about 4 billion years ago. It has generated an astounding diversity of novel mechanisms and structures for adaptation to the environment, for competition and cooperation, and for organisation of the internal and external dynamics of the organism. How does this novelty come about? Evolution builds with the tools available, and on top of what it has already built – therefore, much novelty consists in repurposing old functions in a different context. In the process, the tools themselves evolve, allowing yet more novelty to arise. Despite evolutionary novelty being the most striking observable of evolution, it is not accounted for in classical evolutionary theory. Nevertheless, mathematical and computational models that illustrate mechanisms of evolutionary innovation have been developed. In the present review, we present and compare several examples of computational evo–devo models that capture two aspects of novelty: ‘between-level novelty’ and ‘constructive novelty.’ Novelty can evolve between predefined levels of organisation to dynamically transcode biological information across these levels – as occurs during development. Constructive novelty instead generates a level of biological organisation by exploiting the lower level as an informational scaffold to open a new space of possibilities – an example being the evolution of multicellularity. We propose that the field of computational evo–devo is well-poised to reveal many more exciting mechanisms for the evolution of novelty. A broader theory of evolutionary novelty may well be attainable in the near future. Portland Press Ltd. 2022-12 2022-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9750852/ /pubmed/36468669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/EBC20220069 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article published by Portland Press Limited on behalf of the Biochemical Society and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . Open access for the present article was enabled by the participation of University of Cambridge in an all-inclusive Read & Publish agreement with Portland Press and the Biochemical Society under a transformative agreement with JISC.
spellingShingle Evolutionary Biology
Colizzi, Enrico Sandro
Hogeweg, Paulien
Vroomans, Renske M.A.
Modelling the evolution of novelty: a review
title Modelling the evolution of novelty: a review
title_full Modelling the evolution of novelty: a review
title_fullStr Modelling the evolution of novelty: a review
title_full_unstemmed Modelling the evolution of novelty: a review
title_short Modelling the evolution of novelty: a review
title_sort modelling the evolution of novelty: a review
topic Evolutionary Biology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9750852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36468669
http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/EBC20220069
work_keys_str_mv AT colizzienricosandro modellingtheevolutionofnoveltyareview
AT hogewegpaulien modellingtheevolutionofnoveltyareview
AT vroomansrenskema modellingtheevolutionofnoveltyareview