Cargando…

“Sip & Share”: Building Resilience in Surgery Residency Through Moral Distress Rounds

OBJECTIVE: Resident moral distress rounds were instituted during the COVID-19 pandemic to provide a safe zone for discussion, reflection, and the identification of the ethical challenges contributing to moral distress. The sessions, entitled “Sip & Share,” also served to foster connectedness and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Teo, Richard, Grosser, Rachel, Thuppal, Hayavadhan, Statter, Mindy B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9750891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36526538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2022.11.007
_version_ 1784850356894695424
author Teo, Richard
Grosser, Rachel
Thuppal, Hayavadhan
Statter, Mindy B.
author_facet Teo, Richard
Grosser, Rachel
Thuppal, Hayavadhan
Statter, Mindy B.
author_sort Teo, Richard
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Resident moral distress rounds were instituted during the COVID-19 pandemic to provide a safe zone for discussion, reflection, and the identification of the ethical challenges contributing to moral distress. The sessions, entitled “Sip & Share,” also served to foster connectedness and build resilience. DESIGN: A baseline needs assessment was performed and only 36% of general surgery residents in the program were satisfied with the current non-technical skills curriculum. Only 62% were comfortable with navigating ethical issues in surgery. About 72% were comfortable with leading a goals-of-care discussion, and 63% of residents were comfortable with offering surgical palliative care options. Case-based discussions over video conferencing were organized monthly. Each session was structured based on the eight-step methodology described by Morley and Shashidhara. Participation was voluntary. The sessions explored moral distress, and the ethical tensions between patient autonomy and beneficence, and beneficence and non-maleficence. SETTING: Large general surgery residency in an urban tertiary medical center. PARTICIPANTS: General surgery residents. RESULTS: A post-intervention survey was performed with improvement in the satisfaction with the non-technical skills curriculum (70% from 36%). The proportion of residents feeling comfortable with navigating ethical issues in surgery increased from 62% to 72%. A survey was performed to assess the efficacy of the moral distress rounds after eight Sip & Share sessions over ten months. All thirteen respondents agreed that the discussions provided them with the vocabulary to discuss ethical dilemmas and define the ethical principles contributing to their moral distress. 93% were able to apply the templates learned to their practice, 77% felt that the discussions helped mitigate stress. All respondents recommended attending the sessions to other residents. CONCLUSIONS: Moral distress rounds provide a structured safe zone for residents to share and process morally distressing experiences. These gatherings mitigate isolation, promote a sense of community, and provide a support network within the residency. In addition, residents are equipped with the vocabulary to identify the ethical principles being challenged and are provided practical take-aways to avoid similar conflicts in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9750891
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97508912022-12-15 “Sip & Share”: Building Resilience in Surgery Residency Through Moral Distress Rounds Teo, Richard Grosser, Rachel Thuppal, Hayavadhan Statter, Mindy B. J Surg Educ Original Reports OBJECTIVE: Resident moral distress rounds were instituted during the COVID-19 pandemic to provide a safe zone for discussion, reflection, and the identification of the ethical challenges contributing to moral distress. The sessions, entitled “Sip & Share,” also served to foster connectedness and build resilience. DESIGN: A baseline needs assessment was performed and only 36% of general surgery residents in the program were satisfied with the current non-technical skills curriculum. Only 62% were comfortable with navigating ethical issues in surgery. About 72% were comfortable with leading a goals-of-care discussion, and 63% of residents were comfortable with offering surgical palliative care options. Case-based discussions over video conferencing were organized monthly. Each session was structured based on the eight-step methodology described by Morley and Shashidhara. Participation was voluntary. The sessions explored moral distress, and the ethical tensions between patient autonomy and beneficence, and beneficence and non-maleficence. SETTING: Large general surgery residency in an urban tertiary medical center. PARTICIPANTS: General surgery residents. RESULTS: A post-intervention survey was performed with improvement in the satisfaction with the non-technical skills curriculum (70% from 36%). The proportion of residents feeling comfortable with navigating ethical issues in surgery increased from 62% to 72%. A survey was performed to assess the efficacy of the moral distress rounds after eight Sip & Share sessions over ten months. All thirteen respondents agreed that the discussions provided them with the vocabulary to discuss ethical dilemmas and define the ethical principles contributing to their moral distress. 93% were able to apply the templates learned to their practice, 77% felt that the discussions helped mitigate stress. All respondents recommended attending the sessions to other residents. CONCLUSIONS: Moral distress rounds provide a structured safe zone for residents to share and process morally distressing experiences. These gatherings mitigate isolation, promote a sense of community, and provide a support network within the residency. In addition, residents are equipped with the vocabulary to identify the ethical principles being challenged and are provided practical take-aways to avoid similar conflicts in the future. Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2023-04 2022-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9750891/ /pubmed/36526538 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2022.11.007 Text en © 2022 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Original Reports
Teo, Richard
Grosser, Rachel
Thuppal, Hayavadhan
Statter, Mindy B.
“Sip & Share”: Building Resilience in Surgery Residency Through Moral Distress Rounds
title “Sip & Share”: Building Resilience in Surgery Residency Through Moral Distress Rounds
title_full “Sip & Share”: Building Resilience in Surgery Residency Through Moral Distress Rounds
title_fullStr “Sip & Share”: Building Resilience in Surgery Residency Through Moral Distress Rounds
title_full_unstemmed “Sip & Share”: Building Resilience in Surgery Residency Through Moral Distress Rounds
title_short “Sip & Share”: Building Resilience in Surgery Residency Through Moral Distress Rounds
title_sort “sip & share”: building resilience in surgery residency through moral distress rounds
topic Original Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9750891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36526538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2022.11.007
work_keys_str_mv AT teorichard sipsharebuildingresilienceinsurgeryresidencythroughmoraldistressrounds
AT grosserrachel sipsharebuildingresilienceinsurgeryresidencythroughmoraldistressrounds
AT thuppalhayavadhan sipsharebuildingresilienceinsurgeryresidencythroughmoraldistressrounds
AT stattermindyb sipsharebuildingresilienceinsurgeryresidencythroughmoraldistressrounds