Cargando…

PCSK9 Inhibition and Risk of Diabetes: Should We Worry?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Since the clinical benefit of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors occurs in a setting of reducing low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) to unprecedentedly low levels, it becomes of interest to investigate possible adverse effects pertaining to th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carugo, Stefano, Sirtori, Cesare R., Corsini, Alberto, Tokgozoglu, Lale, Ruscica, Massimiliano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9750910/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36383291
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11883-022-01074-y
_version_ 1784850361695076352
author Carugo, Stefano
Sirtori, Cesare R.
Corsini, Alberto
Tokgozoglu, Lale
Ruscica, Massimiliano
author_facet Carugo, Stefano
Sirtori, Cesare R.
Corsini, Alberto
Tokgozoglu, Lale
Ruscica, Massimiliano
author_sort Carugo, Stefano
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Since the clinical benefit of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors occurs in a setting of reducing low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) to unprecedentedly low levels, it becomes of interest to investigate possible adverse effects pertaining to the risk of new-onset diabetes (NOD). RECENT FINDINGS: While safety results reported in either meta-analyses or cardiovascular outcome trials FOURIER (with evolocumab) and ODYSSEY (with alirocumab) did not rise the incidence of NOD, Mendelian randomization analyses were almost concordant in showing an increased risk of NOD. This evidence was in line with post-marketing safety reports highlighting that evolocumab and alirocumab were primarily related to mild hyperglycaemia rather than diabetes, with most of the hyperglycaemic events occurring during the first 6 months of treatment. SUMMARY: Considering the different nature of genetic studies and of randomized controlled trials, with careful monitoring of patients, particularly in the earlier phases of treatment, and the identification of those more susceptible to develop NOD, treatment with PCSK9 inhibitors should be of minimal concern.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9750910
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97509102022-12-16 PCSK9 Inhibition and Risk of Diabetes: Should We Worry? Carugo, Stefano Sirtori, Cesare R. Corsini, Alberto Tokgozoglu, Lale Ruscica, Massimiliano Curr Atheroscler Rep Cardiometabolic Disease and Treatment (R. Santos, Section Editor) PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Since the clinical benefit of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors occurs in a setting of reducing low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) to unprecedentedly low levels, it becomes of interest to investigate possible adverse effects pertaining to the risk of new-onset diabetes (NOD). RECENT FINDINGS: While safety results reported in either meta-analyses or cardiovascular outcome trials FOURIER (with evolocumab) and ODYSSEY (with alirocumab) did not rise the incidence of NOD, Mendelian randomization analyses were almost concordant in showing an increased risk of NOD. This evidence was in line with post-marketing safety reports highlighting that evolocumab and alirocumab were primarily related to mild hyperglycaemia rather than diabetes, with most of the hyperglycaemic events occurring during the first 6 months of treatment. SUMMARY: Considering the different nature of genetic studies and of randomized controlled trials, with careful monitoring of patients, particularly in the earlier phases of treatment, and the identification of those more susceptible to develop NOD, treatment with PCSK9 inhibitors should be of minimal concern. Springer US 2022-11-16 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9750910/ /pubmed/36383291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11883-022-01074-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Cardiometabolic Disease and Treatment (R. Santos, Section Editor)
Carugo, Stefano
Sirtori, Cesare R.
Corsini, Alberto
Tokgozoglu, Lale
Ruscica, Massimiliano
PCSK9 Inhibition and Risk of Diabetes: Should We Worry?
title PCSK9 Inhibition and Risk of Diabetes: Should We Worry?
title_full PCSK9 Inhibition and Risk of Diabetes: Should We Worry?
title_fullStr PCSK9 Inhibition and Risk of Diabetes: Should We Worry?
title_full_unstemmed PCSK9 Inhibition and Risk of Diabetes: Should We Worry?
title_short PCSK9 Inhibition and Risk of Diabetes: Should We Worry?
title_sort pcsk9 inhibition and risk of diabetes: should we worry?
topic Cardiometabolic Disease and Treatment (R. Santos, Section Editor)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9750910/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36383291
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11883-022-01074-y
work_keys_str_mv AT carugostefano pcsk9inhibitionandriskofdiabetesshouldweworry
AT sirtoricesarer pcsk9inhibitionandriskofdiabetesshouldweworry
AT corsinialberto pcsk9inhibitionandriskofdiabetesshouldweworry
AT tokgozoglulale pcsk9inhibitionandriskofdiabetesshouldweworry
AT ruscicamassimiliano pcsk9inhibitionandriskofdiabetesshouldweworry