Cargando…

Evaluation of formaldehyde, particulate matters 2.5 and 10 emitted to a 3D printing workspace based on ventilation

Recently, the development of 3D printing (3DP) technology and its application in various fields have improved our quality of life. However, hazardous materials that affect the human body, such as formaldehyde and particulate matter (PM), are emitted into the air during 3DP. This study measured the f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Taehun, Hong, Dayeong, Moon, Sojin, Kim, Namkug
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9750962/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36517631
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-25957-x
_version_ 1784850369628602368
author Kim, Taehun
Hong, Dayeong
Moon, Sojin
Kim, Namkug
author_facet Kim, Taehun
Hong, Dayeong
Moon, Sojin
Kim, Namkug
author_sort Kim, Taehun
collection PubMed
description Recently, the development of 3D printing (3DP) technology and its application in various fields have improved our quality of life. However, hazardous materials that affect the human body, such as formaldehyde and particulate matter (PM), are emitted into the air during 3DP. This study measured the formaldehyde, PM(10), and PM(2.5) emitted by 3DP with the ventilation operation using six materials in material extrusion (ME) and vat photopolymerization (VP) and compared them between the 3DP workspace and the control setting with test–retest validation by two researchers. The experiments were divided into four stages based on the 3DP and ventilation operation. A linear mixed model was used to analyze the mean differences and tendencies between the 3DP workspace and the control setting. The change as ventilation was switched from off to on was evaluated by calculating the area. The differences and tendencies were shown in the statistically significant differences from a post-hoc test (α = 0.0125) except for some cases. There was a significant difference in formaldehyde depending on the ventilation operation; however, only a minor difference in PM(10,) and PM(2.5) was confirmed. The amount of formaldehyde exceeding the standard was measured in all materials during 3DP without ventilation. Therefore, it is recommended to operate ventilation systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9750962
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97509622022-12-16 Evaluation of formaldehyde, particulate matters 2.5 and 10 emitted to a 3D printing workspace based on ventilation Kim, Taehun Hong, Dayeong Moon, Sojin Kim, Namkug Sci Rep Article Recently, the development of 3D printing (3DP) technology and its application in various fields have improved our quality of life. However, hazardous materials that affect the human body, such as formaldehyde and particulate matter (PM), are emitted into the air during 3DP. This study measured the formaldehyde, PM(10), and PM(2.5) emitted by 3DP with the ventilation operation using six materials in material extrusion (ME) and vat photopolymerization (VP) and compared them between the 3DP workspace and the control setting with test–retest validation by two researchers. The experiments were divided into four stages based on the 3DP and ventilation operation. A linear mixed model was used to analyze the mean differences and tendencies between the 3DP workspace and the control setting. The change as ventilation was switched from off to on was evaluated by calculating the area. The differences and tendencies were shown in the statistically significant differences from a post-hoc test (α = 0.0125) except for some cases. There was a significant difference in formaldehyde depending on the ventilation operation; however, only a minor difference in PM(10,) and PM(2.5) was confirmed. The amount of formaldehyde exceeding the standard was measured in all materials during 3DP without ventilation. Therefore, it is recommended to operate ventilation systems. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9750962/ /pubmed/36517631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-25957-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Kim, Taehun
Hong, Dayeong
Moon, Sojin
Kim, Namkug
Evaluation of formaldehyde, particulate matters 2.5 and 10 emitted to a 3D printing workspace based on ventilation
title Evaluation of formaldehyde, particulate matters 2.5 and 10 emitted to a 3D printing workspace based on ventilation
title_full Evaluation of formaldehyde, particulate matters 2.5 and 10 emitted to a 3D printing workspace based on ventilation
title_fullStr Evaluation of formaldehyde, particulate matters 2.5 and 10 emitted to a 3D printing workspace based on ventilation
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of formaldehyde, particulate matters 2.5 and 10 emitted to a 3D printing workspace based on ventilation
title_short Evaluation of formaldehyde, particulate matters 2.5 and 10 emitted to a 3D printing workspace based on ventilation
title_sort evaluation of formaldehyde, particulate matters 2.5 and 10 emitted to a 3d printing workspace based on ventilation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9750962/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36517631
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-25957-x
work_keys_str_mv AT kimtaehun evaluationofformaldehydeparticulatematters25and10emittedtoa3dprintingworkspacebasedonventilation
AT hongdayeong evaluationofformaldehydeparticulatematters25and10emittedtoa3dprintingworkspacebasedonventilation
AT moonsojin evaluationofformaldehydeparticulatematters25and10emittedtoa3dprintingworkspacebasedonventilation
AT kimnamkug evaluationofformaldehydeparticulatematters25and10emittedtoa3dprintingworkspacebasedonventilation