Cargando…
A retrospective analysis based on multiple machine learning models to predict lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection has become the primary option of treatment for early gastric cancer. However, lymph node metastasis may lead to poor prognosis. We analyzed factors related to lymph node metastasis in EGC patients, and we developed a construction prediction model with mac...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9751349/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36530978 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1023110 |
_version_ | 1784850451077791744 |
---|---|
author | Yang, Tao Martinez-Useros, Javier Liu, JingWen Alarcón, Isaias Li, Chao Li, WeiYao Xiao, Yuanxun Ji, Xiang Zhao, YanDong Wang, Lei Morales-Conde, Salvador Yang, Zuli |
author_facet | Yang, Tao Martinez-Useros, Javier Liu, JingWen Alarcón, Isaias Li, Chao Li, WeiYao Xiao, Yuanxun Ji, Xiang Zhao, YanDong Wang, Lei Morales-Conde, Salvador Yang, Zuli |
author_sort | Yang, Tao |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection has become the primary option of treatment for early gastric cancer. However, lymph node metastasis may lead to poor prognosis. We analyzed factors related to lymph node metastasis in EGC patients, and we developed a construction prediction model with machine learning using data from a retrospective series. METHODS: Two independent cohorts’ series were evaluated including 305 patients with EGC from China as cohort I and 35 patients from Spain as cohort II. Five classifiers obtained from machine learning were selected to establish a robust prediction model for lymph node metastasis in EGC. RESULTS: The clinical variables such as invasion depth, histologic type, ulceration, tumor location, tumor size, Lauren classification, and age were selected to establish the five prediction models: linear support vector classifier (Linear SVC), logistic regression model, extreme gradient boosting model (XGBoost), light gradient boosting machine model (LightGBM), and Gaussian process classification model. Interestingly, all prediction models of cohort I showed accuracy between 70 and 81%. Furthermore, the prediction models of the cohort II exhibited accuracy between 48 and 82%. The areas under curve (AUC) of the five models between cohort I and cohort II were between 0.736 and 0.830. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support that the machine learning method could be used to predict lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer and perhaps provide another evaluation method to choose the suited treatment for patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9751349 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97513492022-12-16 A retrospective analysis based on multiple machine learning models to predict lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer Yang, Tao Martinez-Useros, Javier Liu, JingWen Alarcón, Isaias Li, Chao Li, WeiYao Xiao, Yuanxun Ji, Xiang Zhao, YanDong Wang, Lei Morales-Conde, Salvador Yang, Zuli Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection has become the primary option of treatment for early gastric cancer. However, lymph node metastasis may lead to poor prognosis. We analyzed factors related to lymph node metastasis in EGC patients, and we developed a construction prediction model with machine learning using data from a retrospective series. METHODS: Two independent cohorts’ series were evaluated including 305 patients with EGC from China as cohort I and 35 patients from Spain as cohort II. Five classifiers obtained from machine learning were selected to establish a robust prediction model for lymph node metastasis in EGC. RESULTS: The clinical variables such as invasion depth, histologic type, ulceration, tumor location, tumor size, Lauren classification, and age were selected to establish the five prediction models: linear support vector classifier (Linear SVC), logistic regression model, extreme gradient boosting model (XGBoost), light gradient boosting machine model (LightGBM), and Gaussian process classification model. Interestingly, all prediction models of cohort I showed accuracy between 70 and 81%. Furthermore, the prediction models of the cohort II exhibited accuracy between 48 and 82%. The areas under curve (AUC) of the five models between cohort I and cohort II were between 0.736 and 0.830. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support that the machine learning method could be used to predict lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer and perhaps provide another evaluation method to choose the suited treatment for patients. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9751349/ /pubmed/36530978 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1023110 Text en Copyright © 2022 Yang, Martinez-Useros, Liu, Alarcón, Li, Li, Xiao, Ji, Zhao, Wang, Morales-Conde and Yang https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Yang, Tao Martinez-Useros, Javier Liu, JingWen Alarcón, Isaias Li, Chao Li, WeiYao Xiao, Yuanxun Ji, Xiang Zhao, YanDong Wang, Lei Morales-Conde, Salvador Yang, Zuli A retrospective analysis based on multiple machine learning models to predict lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer |
title | A retrospective analysis based on multiple machine learning models to predict lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer |
title_full | A retrospective analysis based on multiple machine learning models to predict lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer |
title_fullStr | A retrospective analysis based on multiple machine learning models to predict lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | A retrospective analysis based on multiple machine learning models to predict lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer |
title_short | A retrospective analysis based on multiple machine learning models to predict lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer |
title_sort | retrospective analysis based on multiple machine learning models to predict lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9751349/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36530978 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1023110 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yangtao aretrospectiveanalysisbasedonmultiplemachinelearningmodelstopredictlymphnodemetastasisinearlygastriccancer AT martinezuserosjavier aretrospectiveanalysisbasedonmultiplemachinelearningmodelstopredictlymphnodemetastasisinearlygastriccancer AT liujingwen aretrospectiveanalysisbasedonmultiplemachinelearningmodelstopredictlymphnodemetastasisinearlygastriccancer AT alarconisaias aretrospectiveanalysisbasedonmultiplemachinelearningmodelstopredictlymphnodemetastasisinearlygastriccancer AT lichao aretrospectiveanalysisbasedonmultiplemachinelearningmodelstopredictlymphnodemetastasisinearlygastriccancer AT liweiyao aretrospectiveanalysisbasedonmultiplemachinelearningmodelstopredictlymphnodemetastasisinearlygastriccancer AT xiaoyuanxun aretrospectiveanalysisbasedonmultiplemachinelearningmodelstopredictlymphnodemetastasisinearlygastriccancer AT jixiang aretrospectiveanalysisbasedonmultiplemachinelearningmodelstopredictlymphnodemetastasisinearlygastriccancer AT zhaoyandong aretrospectiveanalysisbasedonmultiplemachinelearningmodelstopredictlymphnodemetastasisinearlygastriccancer AT wanglei aretrospectiveanalysisbasedonmultiplemachinelearningmodelstopredictlymphnodemetastasisinearlygastriccancer AT moralescondesalvador aretrospectiveanalysisbasedonmultiplemachinelearningmodelstopredictlymphnodemetastasisinearlygastriccancer AT yangzuli aretrospectiveanalysisbasedonmultiplemachinelearningmodelstopredictlymphnodemetastasisinearlygastriccancer AT yangtao retrospectiveanalysisbasedonmultiplemachinelearningmodelstopredictlymphnodemetastasisinearlygastriccancer AT martinezuserosjavier retrospectiveanalysisbasedonmultiplemachinelearningmodelstopredictlymphnodemetastasisinearlygastriccancer AT liujingwen retrospectiveanalysisbasedonmultiplemachinelearningmodelstopredictlymphnodemetastasisinearlygastriccancer AT alarconisaias retrospectiveanalysisbasedonmultiplemachinelearningmodelstopredictlymphnodemetastasisinearlygastriccancer AT lichao retrospectiveanalysisbasedonmultiplemachinelearningmodelstopredictlymphnodemetastasisinearlygastriccancer AT liweiyao retrospectiveanalysisbasedonmultiplemachinelearningmodelstopredictlymphnodemetastasisinearlygastriccancer AT xiaoyuanxun retrospectiveanalysisbasedonmultiplemachinelearningmodelstopredictlymphnodemetastasisinearlygastriccancer AT jixiang retrospectiveanalysisbasedonmultiplemachinelearningmodelstopredictlymphnodemetastasisinearlygastriccancer AT zhaoyandong retrospectiveanalysisbasedonmultiplemachinelearningmodelstopredictlymphnodemetastasisinearlygastriccancer AT wanglei retrospectiveanalysisbasedonmultiplemachinelearningmodelstopredictlymphnodemetastasisinearlygastriccancer AT moralescondesalvador retrospectiveanalysisbasedonmultiplemachinelearningmodelstopredictlymphnodemetastasisinearlygastriccancer AT yangzuli retrospectiveanalysisbasedonmultiplemachinelearningmodelstopredictlymphnodemetastasisinearlygastriccancer |