Cargando…

Comparative efficacy of exercise modalities for cardiopulmonary function in hemodialysis patients: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: To provide reliable evidence to exercise rehabilitation therapists and clinicians, we compared and analyzed the effects of different exercise modalities on cardiopulmonary function in hemodialysis patients using Bayesian network meta-analysis. METHODS: PubMed, OVID, Web of Science, Cochr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zang, Wanli, Fang, Mingqing, He, He, Mu, Liang, Zheng, Xiaoqin, Shu, Heng, Ge, Nan, Wang, Su
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9751492/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36530731
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1040704
_version_ 1784850483934920704
author Zang, Wanli
Fang, Mingqing
He, He
Mu, Liang
Zheng, Xiaoqin
Shu, Heng
Ge, Nan
Wang, Su
author_facet Zang, Wanli
Fang, Mingqing
He, He
Mu, Liang
Zheng, Xiaoqin
Shu, Heng
Ge, Nan
Wang, Su
author_sort Zang, Wanli
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To provide reliable evidence to exercise rehabilitation therapists and clinicians, we compared and analyzed the effects of different exercise modalities on cardiopulmonary function in hemodialysis patients using Bayesian network meta-analysis. METHODS: PubMed, OVID, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, SPORT Discus, SinoMed, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP were searched from inception to July 20, 2022. We included randomized controlled trials comparing 12 exercise modalities to improve cardiorespiratory fitness in hemodialysis patients. All statistical analysis was performed using STATA and R. RESULT: A total of 82 randomized controlled trials involving 4146 maintenance hemodialysis patients were included in this study. The pair-wise meta-analysis showed that all exercise modalities had a positive effect on all indicators of cardiorespiratory capacity. The network meta-analysis demonstrated that Blood flow restriction training (BFRT), Cycle exercise (CE), Inspiratory muscle training (IMT), Combined aerobic and resistance training (CT), and Aerobic training (AT) were significantly better than usual care for 6-min walkability; Medium intensity continuous training (MICT), CT, CE, and AT were considerably better than usual care for VO(2)Peak; body and mind training (MBT) and CT significantly improved SBP compared to usual care; and only MBT was significantly better than usual care for DBP. Both the two-dimensional plot and the radar plot demonstrated that CT had the best combined-effect on each index of cardiorespiratory fitness. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses demonstrated the robustness of the results. The evidence was mainly “low” to “very low” for this network meta-analysis. CONCLUSION: There is no one exercise that can achieve the best effect on all of the outcomes. The benefits of MBT in decreasing arterial blood pressure are unsurpassed by other exercise methods. The intervention effect of the CT is better and more stable. Electrical muscle stimulation training (MEST) can be employed in individuals who do not wish to exercise actively but may cause an increase in blood pressure. On the basis of the characteristics of different exercise types, guidelines developers, clinicians, and patients may employ them appropriately. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#recordDetails.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9751492
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97514922022-12-16 Comparative efficacy of exercise modalities for cardiopulmonary function in hemodialysis patients: A systematic review and network meta-analysis Zang, Wanli Fang, Mingqing He, He Mu, Liang Zheng, Xiaoqin Shu, Heng Ge, Nan Wang, Su Front Public Health Public Health BACKGROUND: To provide reliable evidence to exercise rehabilitation therapists and clinicians, we compared and analyzed the effects of different exercise modalities on cardiopulmonary function in hemodialysis patients using Bayesian network meta-analysis. METHODS: PubMed, OVID, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, SPORT Discus, SinoMed, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP were searched from inception to July 20, 2022. We included randomized controlled trials comparing 12 exercise modalities to improve cardiorespiratory fitness in hemodialysis patients. All statistical analysis was performed using STATA and R. RESULT: A total of 82 randomized controlled trials involving 4146 maintenance hemodialysis patients were included in this study. The pair-wise meta-analysis showed that all exercise modalities had a positive effect on all indicators of cardiorespiratory capacity. The network meta-analysis demonstrated that Blood flow restriction training (BFRT), Cycle exercise (CE), Inspiratory muscle training (IMT), Combined aerobic and resistance training (CT), and Aerobic training (AT) were significantly better than usual care for 6-min walkability; Medium intensity continuous training (MICT), CT, CE, and AT were considerably better than usual care for VO(2)Peak; body and mind training (MBT) and CT significantly improved SBP compared to usual care; and only MBT was significantly better than usual care for DBP. Both the two-dimensional plot and the radar plot demonstrated that CT had the best combined-effect on each index of cardiorespiratory fitness. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses demonstrated the robustness of the results. The evidence was mainly “low” to “very low” for this network meta-analysis. CONCLUSION: There is no one exercise that can achieve the best effect on all of the outcomes. The benefits of MBT in decreasing arterial blood pressure are unsurpassed by other exercise methods. The intervention effect of the CT is better and more stable. Electrical muscle stimulation training (MEST) can be employed in individuals who do not wish to exercise actively but may cause an increase in blood pressure. On the basis of the characteristics of different exercise types, guidelines developers, clinicians, and patients may employ them appropriately. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#recordDetails. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9751492/ /pubmed/36530731 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1040704 Text en Copyright © 2022 Zang, Fang, He, Mu, Zheng, Shu, Ge and Wang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Zang, Wanli
Fang, Mingqing
He, He
Mu, Liang
Zheng, Xiaoqin
Shu, Heng
Ge, Nan
Wang, Su
Comparative efficacy of exercise modalities for cardiopulmonary function in hemodialysis patients: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
title Comparative efficacy of exercise modalities for cardiopulmonary function in hemodialysis patients: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_full Comparative efficacy of exercise modalities for cardiopulmonary function in hemodialysis patients: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparative efficacy of exercise modalities for cardiopulmonary function in hemodialysis patients: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparative efficacy of exercise modalities for cardiopulmonary function in hemodialysis patients: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_short Comparative efficacy of exercise modalities for cardiopulmonary function in hemodialysis patients: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_sort comparative efficacy of exercise modalities for cardiopulmonary function in hemodialysis patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9751492/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36530731
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1040704
work_keys_str_mv AT zangwanli comparativeefficacyofexercisemodalitiesforcardiopulmonaryfunctioninhemodialysispatientsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT fangmingqing comparativeefficacyofexercisemodalitiesforcardiopulmonaryfunctioninhemodialysispatientsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT hehe comparativeefficacyofexercisemodalitiesforcardiopulmonaryfunctioninhemodialysispatientsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT muliang comparativeefficacyofexercisemodalitiesforcardiopulmonaryfunctioninhemodialysispatientsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT zhengxiaoqin comparativeefficacyofexercisemodalitiesforcardiopulmonaryfunctioninhemodialysispatientsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT shuheng comparativeefficacyofexercisemodalitiesforcardiopulmonaryfunctioninhemodialysispatientsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT genan comparativeefficacyofexercisemodalitiesforcardiopulmonaryfunctioninhemodialysispatientsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT wangsu comparativeefficacyofexercisemodalitiesforcardiopulmonaryfunctioninhemodialysispatientsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis