Cargando…

386. Clostridioides difficile PCR Cycle Threshold to Determine Toxin Positivity Status

BACKGROUND: Many clinical laboratories rely on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as the sole test for diagnosis of C. difficile infection (CDI). The objective of this study was to determine if the C. difficile (CD) PCR cycle threshold could be used to predict a positive CD toxin test. METHODS: We revi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Crone, Andrew S, Skinner, Andrew M, Wright, Lorinda M, Cheknis, Adam K, Johnson, Stuart, Pacheco, Susan M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9751541/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.464
_version_ 1784850495985156096
author Crone, Andrew S
Skinner, Andrew M
Wright, Lorinda M
Cheknis, Adam K
Johnson, Stuart
Pacheco, Susan M
author_facet Crone, Andrew S
Skinner, Andrew M
Wright, Lorinda M
Cheknis, Adam K
Johnson, Stuart
Pacheco, Susan M
author_sort Crone, Andrew S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Many clinical laboratories rely on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as the sole test for diagnosis of C. difficile infection (CDI). The objective of this study was to determine if the C. difficile (CD) PCR cycle threshold could be used to predict a positive CD toxin test. METHODS: We reviewed the characteristics and outcomes of 149 consecutive patients who tested positive for by PCR (Xpert CD, Cepheid) between October 2019 and December 2021 at one VA Hospital where reflex toxin testing (Cdiff quick check complete, Alere/TechLab) was performed after a positive PCR result. Baseline characteristics, symptoms, initial laboratory data, and treatments were compared as well as clinical outcomes. Determination of CDI or CD colonization was made for each patient after review of symptoms: including chronicity of symptoms, laboratory values, stool frequency, use of laxatives, and response to treatment. The cycle threshold for the CD-PCR results were recorded and positive stools were cultured for CD. RESULTS: Toxin testing was positive in 38% (57/149) of cases. The mean PCR cycle threshold value for all specimens tested was 27.89 (95% CI [27.14, 28.66]). Toxin-positive stools had lower mean PCR cycle thresholds when compared to toxin-negative stools (24.56 and 29.97, respectively p < 0.0001). Among the 149 cases reviewed, 109 were determined to be CDI (73%), 36 were colonized (24%), and 4 cases were undetermined. Among those with toxin-positive stools, 96% (54/56) patients were determined to have CDI. 98% (56/57) of all toxin-positive stools had a cycle threshold of ≤ 32.2 compared to 63% (58/92) of toxin-negative stools, resulting in a negative predictive value of 97.2% (p < 0.0001). The mean cycle threshold was lower in patients who were determined to have a CDI when compared to colonized patients (27.02 vs 30.44, p = 0.0001). [Figure] Of the patients that had CDI, 83% (91/109) had a cycle threshold of ≤ 32.2 and 58% (21/36) of colonized patients had a cycle threshold of ≤ 32.2. [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: Conclusions: In a setting where a CD toxin assay is not readily available, a CD stool PCR cycle threshold could be used to predict toxin status. In our study, a cycle threshold of ≤ 32.2 predicted both toxin-positivity and CDI. DISCLOSURES: Stuart Johnson, M.D., Ferring Pharmaceuticals: Membership on Ferring Publication Steering Committee|Ferring Pharmaceuticals: Employee|Summit Plc: Advisor/Consultant.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9751541
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97515412022-12-16 386. Clostridioides difficile PCR Cycle Threshold to Determine Toxin Positivity Status Crone, Andrew S Skinner, Andrew M Wright, Lorinda M Cheknis, Adam K Johnson, Stuart Pacheco, Susan M Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Many clinical laboratories rely on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as the sole test for diagnosis of C. difficile infection (CDI). The objective of this study was to determine if the C. difficile (CD) PCR cycle threshold could be used to predict a positive CD toxin test. METHODS: We reviewed the characteristics and outcomes of 149 consecutive patients who tested positive for by PCR (Xpert CD, Cepheid) between October 2019 and December 2021 at one VA Hospital where reflex toxin testing (Cdiff quick check complete, Alere/TechLab) was performed after a positive PCR result. Baseline characteristics, symptoms, initial laboratory data, and treatments were compared as well as clinical outcomes. Determination of CDI or CD colonization was made for each patient after review of symptoms: including chronicity of symptoms, laboratory values, stool frequency, use of laxatives, and response to treatment. The cycle threshold for the CD-PCR results were recorded and positive stools were cultured for CD. RESULTS: Toxin testing was positive in 38% (57/149) of cases. The mean PCR cycle threshold value for all specimens tested was 27.89 (95% CI [27.14, 28.66]). Toxin-positive stools had lower mean PCR cycle thresholds when compared to toxin-negative stools (24.56 and 29.97, respectively p < 0.0001). Among the 149 cases reviewed, 109 were determined to be CDI (73%), 36 were colonized (24%), and 4 cases were undetermined. Among those with toxin-positive stools, 96% (54/56) patients were determined to have CDI. 98% (56/57) of all toxin-positive stools had a cycle threshold of ≤ 32.2 compared to 63% (58/92) of toxin-negative stools, resulting in a negative predictive value of 97.2% (p < 0.0001). The mean cycle threshold was lower in patients who were determined to have a CDI when compared to colonized patients (27.02 vs 30.44, p = 0.0001). [Figure] Of the patients that had CDI, 83% (91/109) had a cycle threshold of ≤ 32.2 and 58% (21/36) of colonized patients had a cycle threshold of ≤ 32.2. [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: Conclusions: In a setting where a CD toxin assay is not readily available, a CD stool PCR cycle threshold could be used to predict toxin status. In our study, a cycle threshold of ≤ 32.2 predicted both toxin-positivity and CDI. DISCLOSURES: Stuart Johnson, M.D., Ferring Pharmaceuticals: Membership on Ferring Publication Steering Committee|Ferring Pharmaceuticals: Employee|Summit Plc: Advisor/Consultant. Oxford University Press 2022-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9751541/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.464 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Crone, Andrew S
Skinner, Andrew M
Wright, Lorinda M
Cheknis, Adam K
Johnson, Stuart
Pacheco, Susan M
386. Clostridioides difficile PCR Cycle Threshold to Determine Toxin Positivity Status
title 386. Clostridioides difficile PCR Cycle Threshold to Determine Toxin Positivity Status
title_full 386. Clostridioides difficile PCR Cycle Threshold to Determine Toxin Positivity Status
title_fullStr 386. Clostridioides difficile PCR Cycle Threshold to Determine Toxin Positivity Status
title_full_unstemmed 386. Clostridioides difficile PCR Cycle Threshold to Determine Toxin Positivity Status
title_short 386. Clostridioides difficile PCR Cycle Threshold to Determine Toxin Positivity Status
title_sort 386. clostridioides difficile pcr cycle threshold to determine toxin positivity status
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9751541/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.464
work_keys_str_mv AT croneandrews 386clostridioidesdifficilepcrcyclethresholdtodeterminetoxinpositivitystatus
AT skinnerandrewm 386clostridioidesdifficilepcrcyclethresholdtodeterminetoxinpositivitystatus
AT wrightlorindam 386clostridioidesdifficilepcrcyclethresholdtodeterminetoxinpositivitystatus
AT cheknisadamk 386clostridioidesdifficilepcrcyclethresholdtodeterminetoxinpositivitystatus
AT johnsonstuart 386clostridioidesdifficilepcrcyclethresholdtodeterminetoxinpositivitystatus
AT pachecosusanm 386clostridioidesdifficilepcrcyclethresholdtodeterminetoxinpositivitystatus