Cargando…

1661. Evaluation of Cefazolin < 3 g vs. 3 g Treatment Doses for Cellulitis in Patients Who Weigh ≥ 120 kg within a Large, Community Health System

BACKGROUND: Cefazolin 3 g is recommended for obese patients weighing > 120 kg preoperatively; however, there is no available evidence to suggest 3 g for treatment dosing of cefazolin in this population. This study aims to provide the first clinical data of its kind on the efficacy and safety of h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gens, Krista, Wankum, Michael, Hirsch, Elizabeth B, Gagnon, Brandon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9751635/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.127
_version_ 1784850520113938432
author Gens, Krista
Wankum, Michael
Hirsch, Elizabeth B
Gagnon, Brandon
author_facet Gens, Krista
Wankum, Michael
Hirsch, Elizabeth B
Gagnon, Brandon
author_sort Gens, Krista
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cefazolin 3 g is recommended for obese patients weighing > 120 kg preoperatively; however, there is no available evidence to suggest 3 g for treatment dosing of cefazolin in this population. This study aims to provide the first clinical data of its kind on the efficacy and safety of high-dose cefazolin in the treatment of cellulitis in obese patients using a modified Desirability of Outcomes Ranking (DOOR) methodology. METHODS: This is a multi-center, retrospective cohort study including adults weighing > 120 kg at the time of admission who received ≥ 48 hours of cefazolin monotherapy for cellulitis. Patients were gathered in a 3:1 ratio between the < 3 g dosing (standard-dose; SD) and 3 g dosing (high-dose; HD) groups. Patients were excluded if they had co-infections, bacteremia, bilateral lower extremity cellulitis, or if they received > 48 hours of concomitant antibiotics. The primary endpoint of efficacy and safety as determined by modified DOOR criteria was compared between obese patients who received HD and those who received SD between 1/1/2021 and 12/31/2021. The DOOR is a patient-centered methodology that uses combined efficacy and safety endpoints to help inform better clinical decision-making. RESULTS: A total of 68 patients were included; 51 received SD and 17 received HD cefazolin. There were no differences in mean age nor baseline kidney function or severity of illness between groups. The median patient weights were 140.6 kg and 160 kg for the SD and HD groups, respectively (p = 0.07). Patients achieving clinical success (resolution of cellulitis within 10 days or clinical improvement upon discharge) was higher in the HD vs SD group (70.6% vs 41%; p=0.036) (Figure 1). [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: Cefazolin 3 g was associated with higher clinical success in patients > 120 kg with cellulitis. Further study is necessary to confirm these results. DISCLOSURES: Elizabeth B. Hirsch, PharmD, FCCP, FIDSA, Melinta: Advisor/Consultant|MeMed: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Grant/Research Support.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9751635
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97516352022-12-16 1661. Evaluation of Cefazolin < 3 g vs. 3 g Treatment Doses for Cellulitis in Patients Who Weigh ≥ 120 kg within a Large, Community Health System Gens, Krista Wankum, Michael Hirsch, Elizabeth B Gagnon, Brandon Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Cefazolin 3 g is recommended for obese patients weighing > 120 kg preoperatively; however, there is no available evidence to suggest 3 g for treatment dosing of cefazolin in this population. This study aims to provide the first clinical data of its kind on the efficacy and safety of high-dose cefazolin in the treatment of cellulitis in obese patients using a modified Desirability of Outcomes Ranking (DOOR) methodology. METHODS: This is a multi-center, retrospective cohort study including adults weighing > 120 kg at the time of admission who received ≥ 48 hours of cefazolin monotherapy for cellulitis. Patients were gathered in a 3:1 ratio between the < 3 g dosing (standard-dose; SD) and 3 g dosing (high-dose; HD) groups. Patients were excluded if they had co-infections, bacteremia, bilateral lower extremity cellulitis, or if they received > 48 hours of concomitant antibiotics. The primary endpoint of efficacy and safety as determined by modified DOOR criteria was compared between obese patients who received HD and those who received SD between 1/1/2021 and 12/31/2021. The DOOR is a patient-centered methodology that uses combined efficacy and safety endpoints to help inform better clinical decision-making. RESULTS: A total of 68 patients were included; 51 received SD and 17 received HD cefazolin. There were no differences in mean age nor baseline kidney function or severity of illness between groups. The median patient weights were 140.6 kg and 160 kg for the SD and HD groups, respectively (p = 0.07). Patients achieving clinical success (resolution of cellulitis within 10 days or clinical improvement upon discharge) was higher in the HD vs SD group (70.6% vs 41%; p=0.036) (Figure 1). [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: Cefazolin 3 g was associated with higher clinical success in patients > 120 kg with cellulitis. Further study is necessary to confirm these results. DISCLOSURES: Elizabeth B. Hirsch, PharmD, FCCP, FIDSA, Melinta: Advisor/Consultant|MeMed: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Grant/Research Support. Oxford University Press 2022-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9751635/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.127 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Gens, Krista
Wankum, Michael
Hirsch, Elizabeth B
Gagnon, Brandon
1661. Evaluation of Cefazolin < 3 g vs. 3 g Treatment Doses for Cellulitis in Patients Who Weigh ≥ 120 kg within a Large, Community Health System
title 1661. Evaluation of Cefazolin < 3 g vs. 3 g Treatment Doses for Cellulitis in Patients Who Weigh ≥ 120 kg within a Large, Community Health System
title_full 1661. Evaluation of Cefazolin < 3 g vs. 3 g Treatment Doses for Cellulitis in Patients Who Weigh ≥ 120 kg within a Large, Community Health System
title_fullStr 1661. Evaluation of Cefazolin < 3 g vs. 3 g Treatment Doses for Cellulitis in Patients Who Weigh ≥ 120 kg within a Large, Community Health System
title_full_unstemmed 1661. Evaluation of Cefazolin < 3 g vs. 3 g Treatment Doses for Cellulitis in Patients Who Weigh ≥ 120 kg within a Large, Community Health System
title_short 1661. Evaluation of Cefazolin < 3 g vs. 3 g Treatment Doses for Cellulitis in Patients Who Weigh ≥ 120 kg within a Large, Community Health System
title_sort 1661. evaluation of cefazolin < 3 g vs. 3 g treatment doses for cellulitis in patients who weigh ≥ 120 kg within a large, community health system
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9751635/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.127
work_keys_str_mv AT genskrista 1661evaluationofcefazolin3gvs3gtreatmentdosesforcellulitisinpatientswhoweigh120kgwithinalargecommunityhealthsystem
AT wankummichael 1661evaluationofcefazolin3gvs3gtreatmentdosesforcellulitisinpatientswhoweigh120kgwithinalargecommunityhealthsystem
AT hirschelizabethb 1661evaluationofcefazolin3gvs3gtreatmentdosesforcellulitisinpatientswhoweigh120kgwithinalargecommunityhealthsystem
AT gagnonbrandon 1661evaluationofcefazolin3gvs3gtreatmentdosesforcellulitisinpatientswhoweigh120kgwithinalargecommunityhealthsystem