Cargando…

187. Nasopharyngeal Testing to Individualize Management of Acute Otitis Media

BACKGROUND: There are > 10 million antibiotics prescribed yearly for acute otitis media (AOM). The associated organism can influence the likelihood of antibiotic benefit and optimal treatment. A rapid diagnostic test (RDT) for AOM could prevent unnecessary antibiotic use, while assuring those lik...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sebastian, Thresia, Toseef, Mohammad, Kurtz, Melanie, Frost, Holly M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9751960/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.265
_version_ 1784850601307275264
author Sebastian, Thresia
Toseef, Mohammad
Kurtz, Melanie
Frost, Holly M
author_facet Sebastian, Thresia
Toseef, Mohammad
Kurtz, Melanie
Frost, Holly M
author_sort Sebastian, Thresia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There are > 10 million antibiotics prescribed yearly for acute otitis media (AOM). The associated organism can influence the likelihood of antibiotic benefit and optimal treatment. A rapid diagnostic test (RDT) for AOM could prevent unnecessary antibiotic use, while assuring those likely to benefit from antibiotics receive the appropriate agent. Nasopharyngeal (NP) polymerase chain reaction can effectively exclude the presence of organisms in middle ear fluid and may be useful to individualize care. Objective: To explore the potential cost-effectiveness and reduction in antibiotics with NP RDTs to direct AOM management. METHODS: We developed two algorithms for AOM management based on NP bacterial otopathogens (Figure1). The algorithms provide recommendations on prescribing strategy (immediate, delayed, or observation) and antimicrobial agent. We utilized a tiering system based on expected pathogen-associated severity and resistance. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) expressed as cost per quality adjusted life day gained (QALD). We used a decision-analytic model to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the RDT algorithms compared to usual care from a societal perspective over a 30-day time horizon. Secondary outcomes included the (1) cost at which a RDT would be cost-effective and (2) potential reduction in annual antibiotics used. Flow diagram [Figure: see text] RESULTS: An RDT algorithm that used immediate, delayed prescribing, and observation based on pathogen (RDT-DP) had an ICER of $1336.15/QALD compared with usual care and strongly dominated the RDT that used only immediate prescribing and observation (RDT-OBS). At an RDT cost of $278.56, the ICER for RDT-DP exceeded the willingness to pay threshold ($274 per QALD gained); however, if the cost of the RDT was < $212.10, the ICER was below the threshold. Both algorithms reduced annual antibiotic use, including broad-spectrum use, compared to usual care (RDT-DP 4.7 million (56% reduction), RDT-OBS 5.4 million (49% reduction), usual care 10.5 million). CONCLUSION: The use of a NP RDT for AOM is likely to be cost-effective and substantially reduce unnecessary antibiotic use. These iterative algorithms could be modified to guide AOM management as scientific knowledge evolves. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9751960
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97519602022-12-16 187. Nasopharyngeal Testing to Individualize Management of Acute Otitis Media Sebastian, Thresia Toseef, Mohammad Kurtz, Melanie Frost, Holly M Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: There are > 10 million antibiotics prescribed yearly for acute otitis media (AOM). The associated organism can influence the likelihood of antibiotic benefit and optimal treatment. A rapid diagnostic test (RDT) for AOM could prevent unnecessary antibiotic use, while assuring those likely to benefit from antibiotics receive the appropriate agent. Nasopharyngeal (NP) polymerase chain reaction can effectively exclude the presence of organisms in middle ear fluid and may be useful to individualize care. Objective: To explore the potential cost-effectiveness and reduction in antibiotics with NP RDTs to direct AOM management. METHODS: We developed two algorithms for AOM management based on NP bacterial otopathogens (Figure1). The algorithms provide recommendations on prescribing strategy (immediate, delayed, or observation) and antimicrobial agent. We utilized a tiering system based on expected pathogen-associated severity and resistance. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) expressed as cost per quality adjusted life day gained (QALD). We used a decision-analytic model to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the RDT algorithms compared to usual care from a societal perspective over a 30-day time horizon. Secondary outcomes included the (1) cost at which a RDT would be cost-effective and (2) potential reduction in annual antibiotics used. Flow diagram [Figure: see text] RESULTS: An RDT algorithm that used immediate, delayed prescribing, and observation based on pathogen (RDT-DP) had an ICER of $1336.15/QALD compared with usual care and strongly dominated the RDT that used only immediate prescribing and observation (RDT-OBS). At an RDT cost of $278.56, the ICER for RDT-DP exceeded the willingness to pay threshold ($274 per QALD gained); however, if the cost of the RDT was < $212.10, the ICER was below the threshold. Both algorithms reduced annual antibiotic use, including broad-spectrum use, compared to usual care (RDT-DP 4.7 million (56% reduction), RDT-OBS 5.4 million (49% reduction), usual care 10.5 million). CONCLUSION: The use of a NP RDT for AOM is likely to be cost-effective and substantially reduce unnecessary antibiotic use. These iterative algorithms could be modified to guide AOM management as scientific knowledge evolves. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2022-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9751960/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.265 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Sebastian, Thresia
Toseef, Mohammad
Kurtz, Melanie
Frost, Holly M
187. Nasopharyngeal Testing to Individualize Management of Acute Otitis Media
title 187. Nasopharyngeal Testing to Individualize Management of Acute Otitis Media
title_full 187. Nasopharyngeal Testing to Individualize Management of Acute Otitis Media
title_fullStr 187. Nasopharyngeal Testing to Individualize Management of Acute Otitis Media
title_full_unstemmed 187. Nasopharyngeal Testing to Individualize Management of Acute Otitis Media
title_short 187. Nasopharyngeal Testing to Individualize Management of Acute Otitis Media
title_sort 187. nasopharyngeal testing to individualize management of acute otitis media
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9751960/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.265
work_keys_str_mv AT sebastianthresia 187nasopharyngealtestingtoindividualizemanagementofacuteotitismedia
AT toseefmohammad 187nasopharyngealtestingtoindividualizemanagementofacuteotitismedia
AT kurtzmelanie 187nasopharyngealtestingtoindividualizemanagementofacuteotitismedia
AT frosthollym 187nasopharyngealtestingtoindividualizemanagementofacuteotitismedia