Cargando…
317. Use cases for rapid antigen-detecting tests for COVID-19 screening and surveillance: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: Testing remains critical to controlling the COVID-19 pandemic. Antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs), which can be used at the point of care, have the potential to increase access to COVID-19 testing, particularly in settings with limited laboratory capacity. This systematic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752011/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.395 |
_version_ | 1784850614243557376 |
---|---|
author | Anand, Apoorva Bigio, Jacob MacLean, Emily Underwood, Talya Pai, Nitika Pant Carmona, Sergio Schumacher, Samuel G Toporowski, Amy |
author_facet | Anand, Apoorva Bigio, Jacob MacLean, Emily Underwood, Talya Pai, Nitika Pant Carmona, Sergio Schumacher, Samuel G Toporowski, Amy |
author_sort | Anand, Apoorva |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Testing remains critical to controlling the COVID-19 pandemic. Antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs), which can be used at the point of care, have the potential to increase access to COVID-19 testing, particularly in settings with limited laboratory capacity. This systematic review synthesized literature on specific use cases and performance of Ag-RDTs for detecting SARS-CoV-2, for the first comprehensive assessment of Ag-RDT use in real-world settings. METHODS: We searched three databases (PubMed, EMBASE and medRxiv) up to 12 April 2021 for publications on Ag-RDT use for large-scale screening and surveillance of COVID-19, excluding studies of only presumptive COVID-19 patients. We tabulated data on the study setting, populations, type of test, diagnostic performance, and operational findings. We assessed risk of bias using QUADAS-2 and an adapted tool for prevalence studies. RESULTS: From 4313 citations, 39 studies conducted in asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals were included. Of 39 studies, 37 (94.9%) investigated lateral flow Ag-RDTs and 2 (5.1%) investigated multiplex sandwich chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay Ag-RDTs. Six categories of testing initiatives were identified: mass screening (n=13), targeted screening (n=11), healthcare entry testing (n=6), at-home testing (n=4), surveillance (n=4) and prevalence survey (n=1). Sensitivity and specificity values by testing category are shown in the table. Ag-RDTs were noted as convenient, easy-to-use, and low cost, with a rapid turnaround time and high user acceptability. Risk of bias was generally low or unclear across studies. [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: During the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, Ag-RDTs were used across a wide range of real-world settings for screening and surveillance of COVID-19 in both symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals. Ag-RDTs were fast and simple to run, but due to their often low sensitivity, careful consideration must be given to their implementation and interpretation. Ag-RDTs have subsequently been rolled out more broadly and recommended for COVID-19 self-testing. DISCLOSURES: Talya Underwood, MPhil, Oncotherapeutics: Medical writing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9752011 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97520112022-12-16 317. Use cases for rapid antigen-detecting tests for COVID-19 screening and surveillance: a systematic review Anand, Apoorva Bigio, Jacob MacLean, Emily Underwood, Talya Pai, Nitika Pant Carmona, Sergio Schumacher, Samuel G Toporowski, Amy Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Testing remains critical to controlling the COVID-19 pandemic. Antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs), which can be used at the point of care, have the potential to increase access to COVID-19 testing, particularly in settings with limited laboratory capacity. This systematic review synthesized literature on specific use cases and performance of Ag-RDTs for detecting SARS-CoV-2, for the first comprehensive assessment of Ag-RDT use in real-world settings. METHODS: We searched three databases (PubMed, EMBASE and medRxiv) up to 12 April 2021 for publications on Ag-RDT use for large-scale screening and surveillance of COVID-19, excluding studies of only presumptive COVID-19 patients. We tabulated data on the study setting, populations, type of test, diagnostic performance, and operational findings. We assessed risk of bias using QUADAS-2 and an adapted tool for prevalence studies. RESULTS: From 4313 citations, 39 studies conducted in asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals were included. Of 39 studies, 37 (94.9%) investigated lateral flow Ag-RDTs and 2 (5.1%) investigated multiplex sandwich chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay Ag-RDTs. Six categories of testing initiatives were identified: mass screening (n=13), targeted screening (n=11), healthcare entry testing (n=6), at-home testing (n=4), surveillance (n=4) and prevalence survey (n=1). Sensitivity and specificity values by testing category are shown in the table. Ag-RDTs were noted as convenient, easy-to-use, and low cost, with a rapid turnaround time and high user acceptability. Risk of bias was generally low or unclear across studies. [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: During the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, Ag-RDTs were used across a wide range of real-world settings for screening and surveillance of COVID-19 in both symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals. Ag-RDTs were fast and simple to run, but due to their often low sensitivity, careful consideration must be given to their implementation and interpretation. Ag-RDTs have subsequently been rolled out more broadly and recommended for COVID-19 self-testing. DISCLOSURES: Talya Underwood, MPhil, Oncotherapeutics: Medical writing. Oxford University Press 2022-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9752011/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.395 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Anand, Apoorva Bigio, Jacob MacLean, Emily Underwood, Talya Pai, Nitika Pant Carmona, Sergio Schumacher, Samuel G Toporowski, Amy 317. Use cases for rapid antigen-detecting tests for COVID-19 screening and surveillance: a systematic review |
title | 317. Use cases for rapid antigen-detecting tests for COVID-19 screening and surveillance: a systematic review |
title_full | 317. Use cases for rapid antigen-detecting tests for COVID-19 screening and surveillance: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | 317. Use cases for rapid antigen-detecting tests for COVID-19 screening and surveillance: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | 317. Use cases for rapid antigen-detecting tests for COVID-19 screening and surveillance: a systematic review |
title_short | 317. Use cases for rapid antigen-detecting tests for COVID-19 screening and surveillance: a systematic review |
title_sort | 317. use cases for rapid antigen-detecting tests for covid-19 screening and surveillance: a systematic review |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752011/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.395 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT anandapoorva 317usecasesforrapidantigendetectingtestsforcovid19screeningandsurveillanceasystematicreview AT bigiojacob 317usecasesforrapidantigendetectingtestsforcovid19screeningandsurveillanceasystematicreview AT macleanemily 317usecasesforrapidantigendetectingtestsforcovid19screeningandsurveillanceasystematicreview AT underwoodtalya 317usecasesforrapidantigendetectingtestsforcovid19screeningandsurveillanceasystematicreview AT painitikapant 317usecasesforrapidantigendetectingtestsforcovid19screeningandsurveillanceasystematicreview AT carmonasergio 317usecasesforrapidantigendetectingtestsforcovid19screeningandsurveillanceasystematicreview AT schumachersamuelg 317usecasesforrapidantigendetectingtestsforcovid19screeningandsurveillanceasystematicreview AT toporowskiamy 317usecasesforrapidantigendetectingtestsforcovid19screeningandsurveillanceasystematicreview |