Cargando…

317. Use cases for rapid antigen-detecting tests for COVID-19 screening and surveillance: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Testing remains critical to controlling the COVID-19 pandemic. Antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs), which can be used at the point of care, have the potential to increase access to COVID-19 testing, particularly in settings with limited laboratory capacity. This systematic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anand, Apoorva, Bigio, Jacob, MacLean, Emily, Underwood, Talya, Pai, Nitika Pant, Carmona, Sergio, Schumacher, Samuel G, Toporowski, Amy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752011/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.395
_version_ 1784850614243557376
author Anand, Apoorva
Bigio, Jacob
MacLean, Emily
Underwood, Talya
Pai, Nitika Pant
Carmona, Sergio
Schumacher, Samuel G
Toporowski, Amy
author_facet Anand, Apoorva
Bigio, Jacob
MacLean, Emily
Underwood, Talya
Pai, Nitika Pant
Carmona, Sergio
Schumacher, Samuel G
Toporowski, Amy
author_sort Anand, Apoorva
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Testing remains critical to controlling the COVID-19 pandemic. Antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs), which can be used at the point of care, have the potential to increase access to COVID-19 testing, particularly in settings with limited laboratory capacity. This systematic review synthesized literature on specific use cases and performance of Ag-RDTs for detecting SARS-CoV-2, for the first comprehensive assessment of Ag-RDT use in real-world settings. METHODS: We searched three databases (PubMed, EMBASE and medRxiv) up to 12 April 2021 for publications on Ag-RDT use for large-scale screening and surveillance of COVID-19, excluding studies of only presumptive COVID-19 patients. We tabulated data on the study setting, populations, type of test, diagnostic performance, and operational findings. We assessed risk of bias using QUADAS-2 and an adapted tool for prevalence studies. RESULTS: From 4313 citations, 39 studies conducted in asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals were included. Of 39 studies, 37 (94.9%) investigated lateral flow Ag-RDTs and 2 (5.1%) investigated multiplex sandwich chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay Ag-RDTs. Six categories of testing initiatives were identified: mass screening (n=13), targeted screening (n=11), healthcare entry testing (n=6), at-home testing (n=4), surveillance (n=4) and prevalence survey (n=1). Sensitivity and specificity values by testing category are shown in the table. Ag-RDTs were noted as convenient, easy-to-use, and low cost, with a rapid turnaround time and high user acceptability. Risk of bias was generally low or unclear across studies. [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: During the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, Ag-RDTs were used across a wide range of real-world settings for screening and surveillance of COVID-19 in both symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals. Ag-RDTs were fast and simple to run, but due to their often low sensitivity, careful consideration must be given to their implementation and interpretation. Ag-RDTs have subsequently been rolled out more broadly and recommended for COVID-19 self-testing. DISCLOSURES: Talya Underwood, MPhil, Oncotherapeutics: Medical writing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9752011
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97520112022-12-16 317. Use cases for rapid antigen-detecting tests for COVID-19 screening and surveillance: a systematic review Anand, Apoorva Bigio, Jacob MacLean, Emily Underwood, Talya Pai, Nitika Pant Carmona, Sergio Schumacher, Samuel G Toporowski, Amy Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Testing remains critical to controlling the COVID-19 pandemic. Antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs), which can be used at the point of care, have the potential to increase access to COVID-19 testing, particularly in settings with limited laboratory capacity. This systematic review synthesized literature on specific use cases and performance of Ag-RDTs for detecting SARS-CoV-2, for the first comprehensive assessment of Ag-RDT use in real-world settings. METHODS: We searched three databases (PubMed, EMBASE and medRxiv) up to 12 April 2021 for publications on Ag-RDT use for large-scale screening and surveillance of COVID-19, excluding studies of only presumptive COVID-19 patients. We tabulated data on the study setting, populations, type of test, diagnostic performance, and operational findings. We assessed risk of bias using QUADAS-2 and an adapted tool for prevalence studies. RESULTS: From 4313 citations, 39 studies conducted in asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals were included. Of 39 studies, 37 (94.9%) investigated lateral flow Ag-RDTs and 2 (5.1%) investigated multiplex sandwich chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay Ag-RDTs. Six categories of testing initiatives were identified: mass screening (n=13), targeted screening (n=11), healthcare entry testing (n=6), at-home testing (n=4), surveillance (n=4) and prevalence survey (n=1). Sensitivity and specificity values by testing category are shown in the table. Ag-RDTs were noted as convenient, easy-to-use, and low cost, with a rapid turnaround time and high user acceptability. Risk of bias was generally low or unclear across studies. [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: During the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, Ag-RDTs were used across a wide range of real-world settings for screening and surveillance of COVID-19 in both symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals. Ag-RDTs were fast and simple to run, but due to their often low sensitivity, careful consideration must be given to their implementation and interpretation. Ag-RDTs have subsequently been rolled out more broadly and recommended for COVID-19 self-testing. DISCLOSURES: Talya Underwood, MPhil, Oncotherapeutics: Medical writing. Oxford University Press 2022-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9752011/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.395 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Anand, Apoorva
Bigio, Jacob
MacLean, Emily
Underwood, Talya
Pai, Nitika Pant
Carmona, Sergio
Schumacher, Samuel G
Toporowski, Amy
317. Use cases for rapid antigen-detecting tests for COVID-19 screening and surveillance: a systematic review
title 317. Use cases for rapid antigen-detecting tests for COVID-19 screening and surveillance: a systematic review
title_full 317. Use cases for rapid antigen-detecting tests for COVID-19 screening and surveillance: a systematic review
title_fullStr 317. Use cases for rapid antigen-detecting tests for COVID-19 screening and surveillance: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed 317. Use cases for rapid antigen-detecting tests for COVID-19 screening and surveillance: a systematic review
title_short 317. Use cases for rapid antigen-detecting tests for COVID-19 screening and surveillance: a systematic review
title_sort 317. use cases for rapid antigen-detecting tests for covid-19 screening and surveillance: a systematic review
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752011/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.395
work_keys_str_mv AT anandapoorva 317usecasesforrapidantigendetectingtestsforcovid19screeningandsurveillanceasystematicreview
AT bigiojacob 317usecasesforrapidantigendetectingtestsforcovid19screeningandsurveillanceasystematicreview
AT macleanemily 317usecasesforrapidantigendetectingtestsforcovid19screeningandsurveillanceasystematicreview
AT underwoodtalya 317usecasesforrapidantigendetectingtestsforcovid19screeningandsurveillanceasystematicreview
AT painitikapant 317usecasesforrapidantigendetectingtestsforcovid19screeningandsurveillanceasystematicreview
AT carmonasergio 317usecasesforrapidantigendetectingtestsforcovid19screeningandsurveillanceasystematicreview
AT schumachersamuelg 317usecasesforrapidantigendetectingtestsforcovid19screeningandsurveillanceasystematicreview
AT toporowskiamy 317usecasesforrapidantigendetectingtestsforcovid19screeningandsurveillanceasystematicreview