Cargando…

913. Impact of BioFire(®) FilmArray(®) Blood Culture Identification Panels on Time to Optimal Antimicrobial Therapy

BACKGROUND: Bloodstream infections are associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and costs. Timely initiation of effective treatment is required for optimal outcomes. Conventional microbiological techniques require 72 hours for organism identification; however, rapid blood culture identifica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vyas, Shivam, Giordano, Pamela, Patel, Dimple, Bandali, Aiman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752045/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.758
_version_ 1784850622573445120
author Vyas, Shivam
Giordano, Pamela
Patel, Dimple
Bandali, Aiman
author_facet Vyas, Shivam
Giordano, Pamela
Patel, Dimple
Bandali, Aiman
author_sort Vyas, Shivam
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Bloodstream infections are associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and costs. Timely initiation of effective treatment is required for optimal outcomes. Conventional microbiological techniques require 72 hours for organism identification; however, rapid blood culture identification (BCID) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) panels have expedited this process. At Atlantic Health System, the BioFire(®) FilmArray(®) BCID panel was implemented June 2020 (BCID1), with subsequent upgrade to BCID2 March 2021. Notable features of the BCID2 panel include speciation of Enterococcus spp. and the addition of the CTX-M target. The purpose of this study is to assess time to optimal therapy (TTOT) with and without the BCID platforms for select organisms. [Figure: see text] METHODS: This retrospective study of hospitalized, adult patients was conducted at two community teaching hospitals from 5/2019 to 12/2021. Patients with a blood culture positive for Enterococcus faecalis, E. faecium, Proteus spp., Escherichia coli, or non-aerogenes Klebsiella spp. were included. Patients with polymicrobial or presumed polymicrobial source of bacteremia, recent positive blood cultures, PCR not performed in BCID arms, or who were deceased/comfort care at time of Gram stain were excluded. The primary endpoint was TTOT. Secondary endpoints included time to effective therapy, duration of vancomycin, therapy modification 24 hours after Gram stain result, and length of stay. All analyses compared PreBCID to either BCID1 or BCID2 arm. RESULTS: Three hundred patients (100 per arm) were included. Patient characteristics were similar across study arms. The median Pitt Bacteremia Score was 1, the most common organism identified was E. coli (65%), the most common source of bacteremia was genitourinary (65%), and 11% of isolates produced ESBL. TTOT (days) was similar in PreBCID compared to BCID1 and BCID2 [(2.48 vs. 2.65, p=0.10); (2.48 vs. 2.37 days, p=0.27)]. TTOT was significantly longer in the gram-negative subgroup of the BCID1 arm compared to PreBCID (2.62 vs 1.85 days, p=0.03). See Table 1 for full analyses. CONCLUSION: Implementation of the BCID panels did not reduce TTOT in select organisms at our institution. Barriers to benefit may include limited education and lack of formal antimicrobial stewardship team involvement. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9752045
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97520452022-12-16 913. Impact of BioFire(®) FilmArray(®) Blood Culture Identification Panels on Time to Optimal Antimicrobial Therapy Vyas, Shivam Giordano, Pamela Patel, Dimple Bandali, Aiman Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Bloodstream infections are associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and costs. Timely initiation of effective treatment is required for optimal outcomes. Conventional microbiological techniques require 72 hours for organism identification; however, rapid blood culture identification (BCID) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) panels have expedited this process. At Atlantic Health System, the BioFire(®) FilmArray(®) BCID panel was implemented June 2020 (BCID1), with subsequent upgrade to BCID2 March 2021. Notable features of the BCID2 panel include speciation of Enterococcus spp. and the addition of the CTX-M target. The purpose of this study is to assess time to optimal therapy (TTOT) with and without the BCID platforms for select organisms. [Figure: see text] METHODS: This retrospective study of hospitalized, adult patients was conducted at two community teaching hospitals from 5/2019 to 12/2021. Patients with a blood culture positive for Enterococcus faecalis, E. faecium, Proteus spp., Escherichia coli, or non-aerogenes Klebsiella spp. were included. Patients with polymicrobial or presumed polymicrobial source of bacteremia, recent positive blood cultures, PCR not performed in BCID arms, or who were deceased/comfort care at time of Gram stain were excluded. The primary endpoint was TTOT. Secondary endpoints included time to effective therapy, duration of vancomycin, therapy modification 24 hours after Gram stain result, and length of stay. All analyses compared PreBCID to either BCID1 or BCID2 arm. RESULTS: Three hundred patients (100 per arm) were included. Patient characteristics were similar across study arms. The median Pitt Bacteremia Score was 1, the most common organism identified was E. coli (65%), the most common source of bacteremia was genitourinary (65%), and 11% of isolates produced ESBL. TTOT (days) was similar in PreBCID compared to BCID1 and BCID2 [(2.48 vs. 2.65, p=0.10); (2.48 vs. 2.37 days, p=0.27)]. TTOT was significantly longer in the gram-negative subgroup of the BCID1 arm compared to PreBCID (2.62 vs 1.85 days, p=0.03). See Table 1 for full analyses. CONCLUSION: Implementation of the BCID panels did not reduce TTOT in select organisms at our institution. Barriers to benefit may include limited education and lack of formal antimicrobial stewardship team involvement. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2022-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9752045/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.758 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Vyas, Shivam
Giordano, Pamela
Patel, Dimple
Bandali, Aiman
913. Impact of BioFire(®) FilmArray(®) Blood Culture Identification Panels on Time to Optimal Antimicrobial Therapy
title 913. Impact of BioFire(®) FilmArray(®) Blood Culture Identification Panels on Time to Optimal Antimicrobial Therapy
title_full 913. Impact of BioFire(®) FilmArray(®) Blood Culture Identification Panels on Time to Optimal Antimicrobial Therapy
title_fullStr 913. Impact of BioFire(®) FilmArray(®) Blood Culture Identification Panels on Time to Optimal Antimicrobial Therapy
title_full_unstemmed 913. Impact of BioFire(®) FilmArray(®) Blood Culture Identification Panels on Time to Optimal Antimicrobial Therapy
title_short 913. Impact of BioFire(®) FilmArray(®) Blood Culture Identification Panels on Time to Optimal Antimicrobial Therapy
title_sort 913. impact of biofire(®) filmarray(®) blood culture identification panels on time to optimal antimicrobial therapy
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752045/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.758
work_keys_str_mv AT vyasshivam 913impactofbiofirefilmarraybloodcultureidentificationpanelsontimetooptimalantimicrobialtherapy
AT giordanopamela 913impactofbiofirefilmarraybloodcultureidentificationpanelsontimetooptimalantimicrobialtherapy
AT pateldimple 913impactofbiofirefilmarraybloodcultureidentificationpanelsontimetooptimalantimicrobialtherapy
AT bandaliaiman 913impactofbiofirefilmarraybloodcultureidentificationpanelsontimetooptimalantimicrobialtherapy