Cargando…

The contour effect: Differences in the aesthetic preference and stress response to photo-realistic living environments

The interest in the response to contours has recently re-emerged, with various studies suggesting a universal preference for curved over angular stimuli. Although no consensus has yet been reached on the reasons for this preference, similar effects have been proposed in interior environments. Howeve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tawil, Nour, Ascone, Leonie, Kühn, Simone
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752057/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36532994
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.933344
_version_ 1784850625572372480
author Tawil, Nour
Ascone, Leonie
Kühn, Simone
author_facet Tawil, Nour
Ascone, Leonie
Kühn, Simone
author_sort Tawil, Nour
collection PubMed
description The interest in the response to contours has recently re-emerged, with various studies suggesting a universal preference for curved over angular stimuli. Although no consensus has yet been reached on the reasons for this preference, similar effects have been proposed in interior environments. However, the scarcely available research primarily depends on schematic or unmatched stimuli and faces heterogeneity in the reported results. In a within-subject design, we investigated the claimed contour effect in photo-realistic indoor environments using stimulus material previously tested in virtual reality (VR). A total of 198 online participants rated 20 living room images, exclusively manipulated on the contours (angular vs. curved) and style (modern vs. classic) levels. The scales represented aesthetic (beauty and liking) and stress (rest and stress) responses. Beyond our main focus on contours, we additionally examined style and sex effects to account for potential interactions. Results revealed a significant main effect of contours on both aesthetic (η(2)(g) = 1–2%) and stress (η(2)(g) = 8–12%) ratings. As expected, images of curved (vs. angular) contours scored higher on beauty, liking, and rest scales, and lower on stress. Regarding interactions with style, curvature was aesthetically preferred over angularity only within images depicting modern interiors, however, its positive effect on stress responses remained significant irrespective of style. Furthermore, we observed sex differences in aesthetic but not in stress evaluations, with curvature preference only found in participants who indicated female as their sex. In sum, our study primarily confirms positive effects of curvature, however, with multiple layers. First, the impact on aesthetic preference seems to be influenced by individual and contextual factors. Second, in terms of stress responses, which might be especially relevant for designs intended to promote mental-health, the consistent effects suggest a more generalizable, potentially biophilic characteristic of curves. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate these effects in fully-matched, photo-realistic, and multi-perspective interior design stimuli. From the background of a previous VR trial from our research group, whereby the same rooms did not elicit any differences, our findings propose that static vs. immersive presentations might yield different results in the response to contours.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9752057
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97520572022-12-16 The contour effect: Differences in the aesthetic preference and stress response to photo-realistic living environments Tawil, Nour Ascone, Leonie Kühn, Simone Front Psychol Psychology The interest in the response to contours has recently re-emerged, with various studies suggesting a universal preference for curved over angular stimuli. Although no consensus has yet been reached on the reasons for this preference, similar effects have been proposed in interior environments. However, the scarcely available research primarily depends on schematic or unmatched stimuli and faces heterogeneity in the reported results. In a within-subject design, we investigated the claimed contour effect in photo-realistic indoor environments using stimulus material previously tested in virtual reality (VR). A total of 198 online participants rated 20 living room images, exclusively manipulated on the contours (angular vs. curved) and style (modern vs. classic) levels. The scales represented aesthetic (beauty and liking) and stress (rest and stress) responses. Beyond our main focus on contours, we additionally examined style and sex effects to account for potential interactions. Results revealed a significant main effect of contours on both aesthetic (η(2)(g) = 1–2%) and stress (η(2)(g) = 8–12%) ratings. As expected, images of curved (vs. angular) contours scored higher on beauty, liking, and rest scales, and lower on stress. Regarding interactions with style, curvature was aesthetically preferred over angularity only within images depicting modern interiors, however, its positive effect on stress responses remained significant irrespective of style. Furthermore, we observed sex differences in aesthetic but not in stress evaluations, with curvature preference only found in participants who indicated female as their sex. In sum, our study primarily confirms positive effects of curvature, however, with multiple layers. First, the impact on aesthetic preference seems to be influenced by individual and contextual factors. Second, in terms of stress responses, which might be especially relevant for designs intended to promote mental-health, the consistent effects suggest a more generalizable, potentially biophilic characteristic of curves. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate these effects in fully-matched, photo-realistic, and multi-perspective interior design stimuli. From the background of a previous VR trial from our research group, whereby the same rooms did not elicit any differences, our findings propose that static vs. immersive presentations might yield different results in the response to contours. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9752057/ /pubmed/36532994 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.933344 Text en Copyright © Tawil, Ascone and Kühn. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Tawil, Nour
Ascone, Leonie
Kühn, Simone
The contour effect: Differences in the aesthetic preference and stress response to photo-realistic living environments
title The contour effect: Differences in the aesthetic preference and stress response to photo-realistic living environments
title_full The contour effect: Differences in the aesthetic preference and stress response to photo-realistic living environments
title_fullStr The contour effect: Differences in the aesthetic preference and stress response to photo-realistic living environments
title_full_unstemmed The contour effect: Differences in the aesthetic preference and stress response to photo-realistic living environments
title_short The contour effect: Differences in the aesthetic preference and stress response to photo-realistic living environments
title_sort contour effect: differences in the aesthetic preference and stress response to photo-realistic living environments
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752057/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36532994
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.933344
work_keys_str_mv AT tawilnour thecontoureffectdifferencesintheaestheticpreferenceandstressresponsetophotorealisticlivingenvironments
AT asconeleonie thecontoureffectdifferencesintheaestheticpreferenceandstressresponsetophotorealisticlivingenvironments
AT kuhnsimone thecontoureffectdifferencesintheaestheticpreferenceandstressresponsetophotorealisticlivingenvironments
AT tawilnour contoureffectdifferencesintheaestheticpreferenceandstressresponsetophotorealisticlivingenvironments
AT asconeleonie contoureffectdifferencesintheaestheticpreferenceandstressresponsetophotorealisticlivingenvironments
AT kuhnsimone contoureffectdifferencesintheaestheticpreferenceandstressresponsetophotorealisticlivingenvironments