Cargando…

313. Performance of Rapid Diagnostic Testing at Days 4-6 from Diagnosis: Implications for Discharge from Isolation on a University Campus

BACKGROUND: Omicron rapidly replaced delta as the predominant strain causing COVID-19 related illness in the United States (US) in December 2021, the same month the US CDC reduced the recommended isolation period from 10 to 5 days for asymptomatic individuals or those with resolving symptoms. New ev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Atarere, Joseph, Zhou, Zhenwei, Turcinovic, Jacquelyn, Seitz, Scott, Sher-Jan, Cole, Gilbert, Madison, White, Laura F, Hossain, Mohammad, Overbeck, Victoria, Mistry, Roxanne M, Doucette-Stamm, Lynn, Platt, Judy T, Nichols, Hannah E, Hamer, Davidson H, Klapperich, Catherine M, Jacobson, Karen R, Connor, John, Bouton, Tara C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752119/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.391
_version_ 1784850641612439552
author Atarere, Joseph
Zhou, Zhenwei
Turcinovic, Jacquelyn
Seitz, Scott
Sher-Jan, Cole
Gilbert, Madison
White, Laura F
Hossain, Mohammad
Overbeck, Victoria
Mistry, Roxanne M
Doucette-Stamm, Lynn
Platt, Judy T
Nichols, Hannah E
Hamer, Davidson H
Klapperich, Catherine M
Jacobson, Karen R
Connor, John
Bouton, Tara C
author_facet Atarere, Joseph
Zhou, Zhenwei
Turcinovic, Jacquelyn
Seitz, Scott
Sher-Jan, Cole
Gilbert, Madison
White, Laura F
Hossain, Mohammad
Overbeck, Victoria
Mistry, Roxanne M
Doucette-Stamm, Lynn
Platt, Judy T
Nichols, Hannah E
Hamer, Davidson H
Klapperich, Catherine M
Jacobson, Karen R
Connor, John
Bouton, Tara C
author_sort Atarere, Joseph
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Omicron rapidly replaced delta as the predominant strain causing COVID-19 related illness in the United States (US) in December 2021, the same month the US CDC reduced the recommended isolation period from 10 to 5 days for asymptomatic individuals or those with resolving symptoms. New evidence suggests some asymptomatic individuals with omicron remain culture positive beyond 5 days from diagnosis. We sought to evaluate the performance of a SARS-CoV-2 antigen rapid diagnostic test (RDT) in predicting persistent potential for transmission at the end of a five-day isolation period among young, fully vaccinated individuals in a university community setting. METHODS: A subgroup of participants enrolled in a longitudinal COVID-19 cohort were asked to self-perform RDTs on days 4 to 6 from diagnostic test date in addition to a separate self-collected anterior nasal swab used for culture and RT-PCR, and a daily symptom screen (15 COVID-19 symptom questions on a 4-point scale). We calculated the daily and overall sensitivity and specificity of the RDTs in comparison to SARS-CoV-2 culture result. We also compared the N1 cycle threshold (CT) values and symptom score on each day of the study by RDT results. RESULTS: Of 23 participants, the mean age was 20 years, all had completed their primary COVID-19 vaccine series, and 13 (65.0%) had received a booster vaccine (Table 1). Compared to culture, sensitivity and specificity of the RDTs were 100% and 62% respectively (Table 2). Compared to participants with negative RDTs, median CT values were lower in those with positive RDTs on each day of the study (Figure 1). Participants who had positive RDTs on all three days had higher symptom scores (Figure 2) than those without. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: RDTs have a high sensitivity in detecting culture positive SARS-CoV-2 on Days 4 to 6 from initial diagnostic test. However, the high false positive rate of 38% means that over a third of culture negative individuals will stay in isolation longer than necessary if RDTs are used in test to release from isolation protocols. Viral loads (CT values) and symptom scores were higher for participants with persistently positive RDT result. An approach that uses a combination of RDTs, CT values and symptom score may prove useful in guiding isolation duration. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] DISCLOSURES: Davidson H. Hamer, MD, Trinity Biotech: Advisor/Consultant Catherine M. Klapperich, Ph.D., BioSens8, LLC: Ownership Interest.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9752119
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97521192022-12-16 313. Performance of Rapid Diagnostic Testing at Days 4-6 from Diagnosis: Implications for Discharge from Isolation on a University Campus Atarere, Joseph Zhou, Zhenwei Turcinovic, Jacquelyn Seitz, Scott Sher-Jan, Cole Gilbert, Madison White, Laura F Hossain, Mohammad Overbeck, Victoria Mistry, Roxanne M Doucette-Stamm, Lynn Platt, Judy T Nichols, Hannah E Hamer, Davidson H Klapperich, Catherine M Jacobson, Karen R Connor, John Bouton, Tara C Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Omicron rapidly replaced delta as the predominant strain causing COVID-19 related illness in the United States (US) in December 2021, the same month the US CDC reduced the recommended isolation period from 10 to 5 days for asymptomatic individuals or those with resolving symptoms. New evidence suggests some asymptomatic individuals with omicron remain culture positive beyond 5 days from diagnosis. We sought to evaluate the performance of a SARS-CoV-2 antigen rapid diagnostic test (RDT) in predicting persistent potential for transmission at the end of a five-day isolation period among young, fully vaccinated individuals in a university community setting. METHODS: A subgroup of participants enrolled in a longitudinal COVID-19 cohort were asked to self-perform RDTs on days 4 to 6 from diagnostic test date in addition to a separate self-collected anterior nasal swab used for culture and RT-PCR, and a daily symptom screen (15 COVID-19 symptom questions on a 4-point scale). We calculated the daily and overall sensitivity and specificity of the RDTs in comparison to SARS-CoV-2 culture result. We also compared the N1 cycle threshold (CT) values and symptom score on each day of the study by RDT results. RESULTS: Of 23 participants, the mean age was 20 years, all had completed their primary COVID-19 vaccine series, and 13 (65.0%) had received a booster vaccine (Table 1). Compared to culture, sensitivity and specificity of the RDTs were 100% and 62% respectively (Table 2). Compared to participants with negative RDTs, median CT values were lower in those with positive RDTs on each day of the study (Figure 1). Participants who had positive RDTs on all three days had higher symptom scores (Figure 2) than those without. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: RDTs have a high sensitivity in detecting culture positive SARS-CoV-2 on Days 4 to 6 from initial diagnostic test. However, the high false positive rate of 38% means that over a third of culture negative individuals will stay in isolation longer than necessary if RDTs are used in test to release from isolation protocols. Viral loads (CT values) and symptom scores were higher for participants with persistently positive RDT result. An approach that uses a combination of RDTs, CT values and symptom score may prove useful in guiding isolation duration. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] DISCLOSURES: Davidson H. Hamer, MD, Trinity Biotech: Advisor/Consultant Catherine M. Klapperich, Ph.D., BioSens8, LLC: Ownership Interest. Oxford University Press 2022-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9752119/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.391 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Atarere, Joseph
Zhou, Zhenwei
Turcinovic, Jacquelyn
Seitz, Scott
Sher-Jan, Cole
Gilbert, Madison
White, Laura F
Hossain, Mohammad
Overbeck, Victoria
Mistry, Roxanne M
Doucette-Stamm, Lynn
Platt, Judy T
Nichols, Hannah E
Hamer, Davidson H
Klapperich, Catherine M
Jacobson, Karen R
Connor, John
Bouton, Tara C
313. Performance of Rapid Diagnostic Testing at Days 4-6 from Diagnosis: Implications for Discharge from Isolation on a University Campus
title 313. Performance of Rapid Diagnostic Testing at Days 4-6 from Diagnosis: Implications for Discharge from Isolation on a University Campus
title_full 313. Performance of Rapid Diagnostic Testing at Days 4-6 from Diagnosis: Implications for Discharge from Isolation on a University Campus
title_fullStr 313. Performance of Rapid Diagnostic Testing at Days 4-6 from Diagnosis: Implications for Discharge from Isolation on a University Campus
title_full_unstemmed 313. Performance of Rapid Diagnostic Testing at Days 4-6 from Diagnosis: Implications for Discharge from Isolation on a University Campus
title_short 313. Performance of Rapid Diagnostic Testing at Days 4-6 from Diagnosis: Implications for Discharge from Isolation on a University Campus
title_sort 313. performance of rapid diagnostic testing at days 4-6 from diagnosis: implications for discharge from isolation on a university campus
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752119/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.391
work_keys_str_mv AT atarerejoseph 313performanceofrapiddiagnostictestingatdays46fromdiagnosisimplicationsfordischargefromisolationonauniversitycampus
AT zhouzhenwei 313performanceofrapiddiagnostictestingatdays46fromdiagnosisimplicationsfordischargefromisolationonauniversitycampus
AT turcinovicjacquelyn 313performanceofrapiddiagnostictestingatdays46fromdiagnosisimplicationsfordischargefromisolationonauniversitycampus
AT seitzscott 313performanceofrapiddiagnostictestingatdays46fromdiagnosisimplicationsfordischargefromisolationonauniversitycampus
AT sherjancole 313performanceofrapiddiagnostictestingatdays46fromdiagnosisimplicationsfordischargefromisolationonauniversitycampus
AT gilbertmadison 313performanceofrapiddiagnostictestingatdays46fromdiagnosisimplicationsfordischargefromisolationonauniversitycampus
AT whitelauraf 313performanceofrapiddiagnostictestingatdays46fromdiagnosisimplicationsfordischargefromisolationonauniversitycampus
AT hossainmohammad 313performanceofrapiddiagnostictestingatdays46fromdiagnosisimplicationsfordischargefromisolationonauniversitycampus
AT overbeckvictoria 313performanceofrapiddiagnostictestingatdays46fromdiagnosisimplicationsfordischargefromisolationonauniversitycampus
AT mistryroxannem 313performanceofrapiddiagnostictestingatdays46fromdiagnosisimplicationsfordischargefromisolationonauniversitycampus
AT doucettestammlynn 313performanceofrapiddiagnostictestingatdays46fromdiagnosisimplicationsfordischargefromisolationonauniversitycampus
AT plattjudyt 313performanceofrapiddiagnostictestingatdays46fromdiagnosisimplicationsfordischargefromisolationonauniversitycampus
AT nicholshannahe 313performanceofrapiddiagnostictestingatdays46fromdiagnosisimplicationsfordischargefromisolationonauniversitycampus
AT hamerdavidsonh 313performanceofrapiddiagnostictestingatdays46fromdiagnosisimplicationsfordischargefromisolationonauniversitycampus
AT klapperichcatherinem 313performanceofrapiddiagnostictestingatdays46fromdiagnosisimplicationsfordischargefromisolationonauniversitycampus
AT jacobsonkarenr 313performanceofrapiddiagnostictestingatdays46fromdiagnosisimplicationsfordischargefromisolationonauniversitycampus
AT connorjohn 313performanceofrapiddiagnostictestingatdays46fromdiagnosisimplicationsfordischargefromisolationonauniversitycampus
AT boutontarac 313performanceofrapiddiagnostictestingatdays46fromdiagnosisimplicationsfordischargefromisolationonauniversitycampus