Cargando…

919. Let’s GO PO: Impact of Monthly Feedback on a Longitudinal Intravenous to Oral Antimicrobial Conversion Initiative

BACKGROUND: Timely conversion of antimicrobials from intravenous (IV) to oral (PO) route has been shown to decrease costs and length of stay (LOS) without compromising safety and efficacy of therapy. Use of oral antimicrobials may additionally prevent complications related to IV catheters, such as i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hayes, Jillian E, Carr, Amy L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752120/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.764
_version_ 1784850641906040832
author Hayes, Jillian E
Carr, Amy L
author_facet Hayes, Jillian E
Carr, Amy L
author_sort Hayes, Jillian E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Timely conversion of antimicrobials from intravenous (IV) to oral (PO) route has been shown to decrease costs and length of stay (LOS) without compromising safety and efficacy of therapy. Use of oral antimicrobials may additionally prevent complications related to IV catheters, such as infection, emboli, and patient discomfort. An approved IV to PO policy allowed pharmacists to convert orders for fourteen included antimicrobials and eligible patients at time of order verification. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective, comparative study was conducted at AdventHealth Orlando, a 1,368-bed community teaching hospital in central Florida. In November 2020, six clinical pharmacist teams began receiving monthly feedback on IV to PO conversion rates in the form of a RePOrt Card, containing IV to PO conversion rates compared to other clinical teams, individual antimicrobial conversion rates, and comparison to prior team progress (Figure 1). RePOrt Cards were provided through October 2021. This study compared pre-intervention days of therapy (DOTs) of antimicrobials from November 2019-October 2020 to post-intervention DOTs from November 2020 to March 2022. The primary objective of this study was to assess the impact of monthly, team-based feedback on percentage of antimicrobials administered orally during a pharmacist-driven IV to PO stewardship initiative. [Figure: see text] RESULTS: Significantly more DOTs were administered orally in the post intervention group (62% vs 67%, p=0.0012). Positive change in oral conversion rates was observed for all agents except linezolid, minocycline, and voriconazole (Table 1). The largest increase in percentage of DOT administered orally was observed for azithromycin (20%), rifampin (14%), and metronidazole (10%). Estimated monthly and total cost differences are available in Table 2. Minocycline represents the largest opportunity missed; while oral conversion rates remained the same, an increase in overall drug use creates opportunity to continue to prioritize oral conversion due to high cost. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: Monthly, team-based feedback positively impacted IV to PO conversion rates. Opportunities remain to optimize cost benefits in high-cost agents such as linezolid, minocycline, and voriconazole. DISCLOSURES: Amy L. Carr, PharmD, BCIDP, Shionogi: Advisory Board.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9752120
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97521202022-12-16 919. Let’s GO PO: Impact of Monthly Feedback on a Longitudinal Intravenous to Oral Antimicrobial Conversion Initiative Hayes, Jillian E Carr, Amy L Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Timely conversion of antimicrobials from intravenous (IV) to oral (PO) route has been shown to decrease costs and length of stay (LOS) without compromising safety and efficacy of therapy. Use of oral antimicrobials may additionally prevent complications related to IV catheters, such as infection, emboli, and patient discomfort. An approved IV to PO policy allowed pharmacists to convert orders for fourteen included antimicrobials and eligible patients at time of order verification. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective, comparative study was conducted at AdventHealth Orlando, a 1,368-bed community teaching hospital in central Florida. In November 2020, six clinical pharmacist teams began receiving monthly feedback on IV to PO conversion rates in the form of a RePOrt Card, containing IV to PO conversion rates compared to other clinical teams, individual antimicrobial conversion rates, and comparison to prior team progress (Figure 1). RePOrt Cards were provided through October 2021. This study compared pre-intervention days of therapy (DOTs) of antimicrobials from November 2019-October 2020 to post-intervention DOTs from November 2020 to March 2022. The primary objective of this study was to assess the impact of monthly, team-based feedback on percentage of antimicrobials administered orally during a pharmacist-driven IV to PO stewardship initiative. [Figure: see text] RESULTS: Significantly more DOTs were administered orally in the post intervention group (62% vs 67%, p=0.0012). Positive change in oral conversion rates was observed for all agents except linezolid, minocycline, and voriconazole (Table 1). The largest increase in percentage of DOT administered orally was observed for azithromycin (20%), rifampin (14%), and metronidazole (10%). Estimated monthly and total cost differences are available in Table 2. Minocycline represents the largest opportunity missed; while oral conversion rates remained the same, an increase in overall drug use creates opportunity to continue to prioritize oral conversion due to high cost. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: Monthly, team-based feedback positively impacted IV to PO conversion rates. Opportunities remain to optimize cost benefits in high-cost agents such as linezolid, minocycline, and voriconazole. DISCLOSURES: Amy L. Carr, PharmD, BCIDP, Shionogi: Advisory Board. Oxford University Press 2022-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9752120/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.764 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Hayes, Jillian E
Carr, Amy L
919. Let’s GO PO: Impact of Monthly Feedback on a Longitudinal Intravenous to Oral Antimicrobial Conversion Initiative
title 919. Let’s GO PO: Impact of Monthly Feedback on a Longitudinal Intravenous to Oral Antimicrobial Conversion Initiative
title_full 919. Let’s GO PO: Impact of Monthly Feedback on a Longitudinal Intravenous to Oral Antimicrobial Conversion Initiative
title_fullStr 919. Let’s GO PO: Impact of Monthly Feedback on a Longitudinal Intravenous to Oral Antimicrobial Conversion Initiative
title_full_unstemmed 919. Let’s GO PO: Impact of Monthly Feedback on a Longitudinal Intravenous to Oral Antimicrobial Conversion Initiative
title_short 919. Let’s GO PO: Impact of Monthly Feedback on a Longitudinal Intravenous to Oral Antimicrobial Conversion Initiative
title_sort 919. let’s go po: impact of monthly feedback on a longitudinal intravenous to oral antimicrobial conversion initiative
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752120/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.764
work_keys_str_mv AT hayesjilliane 919letsgopoimpactofmonthlyfeedbackonalongitudinalintravenoustooralantimicrobialconversioninitiative
AT carramyl 919letsgopoimpactofmonthlyfeedbackonalongitudinalintravenoustooralantimicrobialconversioninitiative