Cargando…

383. Assessing the 2021 IDSA Treatment Clostridioides difficile Guidelines in a Small, Community Hospital

BACKGROUND: Cambridge Health Alliance (CHA) is an academic healthcare system in the greater Boston area that includes two acute care, community hospitals. Oral vancomycin has been the first line treatment option for initial C. difficile infection (CDI). In 2021, IDSA updated its guidelines to recomm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barner, Amanda, Maiullari, Michael, Yu, Shirley, Regan, Mary
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752177/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.461
_version_ 1784850656635387904
author Barner, Amanda
Maiullari, Michael
Yu, Shirley
Yu, Shirley
Regan, Mary
author_facet Barner, Amanda
Maiullari, Michael
Yu, Shirley
Yu, Shirley
Regan, Mary
author_sort Barner, Amanda
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cambridge Health Alliance (CHA) is an academic healthcare system in the greater Boston area that includes two acute care, community hospitals. Oral vancomycin has been the first line treatment option for initial C. difficile infection (CDI). In 2021, IDSA updated its guidelines to recommend fidaxomicin as the preferred treatment for initial episodes. At our institution, fidaxomicin is restricted to infectious diseases approval.The objective of this evaluation was to assess CDI recurrence rate and to identify a target population within our organization who may benefit from fidaxomicin as initial CDI treatment. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all inpatients ordered for oral vancomycin or fidaxomicin from January 2021 to February 2022 was conducted to assess treatment success, failure, and 60 day recurrence rate of CDI at two community teaching hospitals. Treatment success was defined as resolution of diarrhea or absence of diarrhea for two consecutive days after completion of therapy. Treatment failure was defined as continuation of symptoms for greater than 6 days after treatment initiation. Risk factors for recurrence evaluated were age > 65 years, immunocompromised status, fulminant infection, and use of vancomycin versus fidaxomicin. RESULTS: A total of 47 patients administered oral vancomycin or fidaxomicin for CDI treatment between January 2021 and February 2022 were included in the analysis. Only one patient received fidaxomicin. The median age was 66 years and 55.3% female. Four patients were immunocompromised. Only one immunocompromised patient over 65 years had CDI recurrence. In our population, oral vancomycin had a treatment success rate of 85.1% and a recurrence rate of 2%. The one patient who received fidaxomicin did not have recurrence. Given the low recurrence rate, we were unable to identify significant risk factors associated with CDI recurrence in our population. CONCLUSION: In our population, oral vancomycin had a high treatment success rate, which correlates with current literature. Limitations of our analysis include its retrospective design, small sample size, and inclusion of few immunocompromised patients. Oral vancomycin remains the preferred treatment for an initial CDI episode in our population, as recurrence rate is low. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9752177
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97521772022-12-16 383. Assessing the 2021 IDSA Treatment Clostridioides difficile Guidelines in a Small, Community Hospital Barner, Amanda Maiullari, Michael Yu, Shirley Yu, Shirley Regan, Mary Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Cambridge Health Alliance (CHA) is an academic healthcare system in the greater Boston area that includes two acute care, community hospitals. Oral vancomycin has been the first line treatment option for initial C. difficile infection (CDI). In 2021, IDSA updated its guidelines to recommend fidaxomicin as the preferred treatment for initial episodes. At our institution, fidaxomicin is restricted to infectious diseases approval.The objective of this evaluation was to assess CDI recurrence rate and to identify a target population within our organization who may benefit from fidaxomicin as initial CDI treatment. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all inpatients ordered for oral vancomycin or fidaxomicin from January 2021 to February 2022 was conducted to assess treatment success, failure, and 60 day recurrence rate of CDI at two community teaching hospitals. Treatment success was defined as resolution of diarrhea or absence of diarrhea for two consecutive days after completion of therapy. Treatment failure was defined as continuation of symptoms for greater than 6 days after treatment initiation. Risk factors for recurrence evaluated were age > 65 years, immunocompromised status, fulminant infection, and use of vancomycin versus fidaxomicin. RESULTS: A total of 47 patients administered oral vancomycin or fidaxomicin for CDI treatment between January 2021 and February 2022 were included in the analysis. Only one patient received fidaxomicin. The median age was 66 years and 55.3% female. Four patients were immunocompromised. Only one immunocompromised patient over 65 years had CDI recurrence. In our population, oral vancomycin had a treatment success rate of 85.1% and a recurrence rate of 2%. The one patient who received fidaxomicin did not have recurrence. Given the low recurrence rate, we were unable to identify significant risk factors associated with CDI recurrence in our population. CONCLUSION: In our population, oral vancomycin had a high treatment success rate, which correlates with current literature. Limitations of our analysis include its retrospective design, small sample size, and inclusion of few immunocompromised patients. Oral vancomycin remains the preferred treatment for an initial CDI episode in our population, as recurrence rate is low. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2022-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9752177/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.461 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Barner, Amanda
Maiullari, Michael
Yu, Shirley
Yu, Shirley
Regan, Mary
383. Assessing the 2021 IDSA Treatment Clostridioides difficile Guidelines in a Small, Community Hospital
title 383. Assessing the 2021 IDSA Treatment Clostridioides difficile Guidelines in a Small, Community Hospital
title_full 383. Assessing the 2021 IDSA Treatment Clostridioides difficile Guidelines in a Small, Community Hospital
title_fullStr 383. Assessing the 2021 IDSA Treatment Clostridioides difficile Guidelines in a Small, Community Hospital
title_full_unstemmed 383. Assessing the 2021 IDSA Treatment Clostridioides difficile Guidelines in a Small, Community Hospital
title_short 383. Assessing the 2021 IDSA Treatment Clostridioides difficile Guidelines in a Small, Community Hospital
title_sort 383. assessing the 2021 idsa treatment clostridioides difficile guidelines in a small, community hospital
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752177/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.461
work_keys_str_mv AT barneramanda 383assessingthe2021idsatreatmentclostridioidesdifficileguidelinesinasmallcommunityhospital
AT maiullarimichael 383assessingthe2021idsatreatmentclostridioidesdifficileguidelinesinasmallcommunityhospital
AT yushirley 383assessingthe2021idsatreatmentclostridioidesdifficileguidelinesinasmallcommunityhospital
AT yushirley 383assessingthe2021idsatreatmentclostridioidesdifficileguidelinesinasmallcommunityhospital
AT reganmary 383assessingthe2021idsatreatmentclostridioidesdifficileguidelinesinasmallcommunityhospital