Cargando…

161. Assessing Trends in 1,3-β-D Glucan and Aspergillus Galactomannan Antigen Ordering to Improve Use

BACKGROUND: 1,3-β-D Glucan (BDG) and Aspergillus galactomannan antigen (GM) are commonly ordered. Overutilization of these tests increases the incidence of false positive results, potentially leading to unnecessary follow up testing, procedures, and treatment. The aim of this quality improvement (QI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Poplin, Victoria, Liesman, Rachael, Bahr, Nathan C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752178/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.239
_version_ 1784850656921649152
author Poplin, Victoria
Liesman, Rachael
Bahr, Nathan C
author_facet Poplin, Victoria
Liesman, Rachael
Bahr, Nathan C
author_sort Poplin, Victoria
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: 1,3-β-D Glucan (BDG) and Aspergillus galactomannan antigen (GM) are commonly ordered. Overutilization of these tests increases the incidence of false positive results, potentially leading to unnecessary follow up testing, procedures, and treatment. The aim of this quality improvement (QI) study was to improve our understanding of BDG and GM utilization at our institution. METHODS: The test orders for BDG and GM were modified within our electronic medical record (EMR) to provide education and require selection of ordering reason from a list of criteria. Educational sessions were provided to non-transplant provider groups who order BDG and GM frequently. Total number of tests, test results, patient immunosuppressed status, ordering location, and provider specialty were compared for a 3-month period pre/post intervention. Ordering criteria was collected post-intervention. SPSS software was used for chi square tests comparing groups. RESULTS: BDG and GM ordering practices were compared in the pre- and post-intervention timeframes (Table 1). There were no significant differences in the total number of tests, immune status of patients, ordering location or test results for BDG or GM. A significant decrease in hospitalist ordering was found (n=79 (pre), n=48 (post), p=0.006). Positive GM tests were rare in both periods (1.96%, 6/306 and 3.34%, 10/299). Ordering criteria for both tests were also evaluated in the post-intervention period (Table 2). The most common ordering criteria selected for BDG and GM were disseminated fungal infection 275/435 (63%) and invasive aspergillosis 241/299 (81%), respectively. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: Most BDG and GM tests were ordered utilizing appropriate ordering criteria and were among immunosuppressed patients. However, selection of an appropriate reason does not necessarily correlate to obtaining in the appropriate clinical setting. This QI project improved our understanding of how BDG and GM are utilized, and by whom. In the future, these results will be used to provide more targeted education to specific provider groups. In addition, further EMR order entry modifications will focus on potential false positive results to further optimize BDG and GM test utilization. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9752178
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97521782022-12-16 161. Assessing Trends in 1,3-β-D Glucan and Aspergillus Galactomannan Antigen Ordering to Improve Use Poplin, Victoria Liesman, Rachael Bahr, Nathan C Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: 1,3-β-D Glucan (BDG) and Aspergillus galactomannan antigen (GM) are commonly ordered. Overutilization of these tests increases the incidence of false positive results, potentially leading to unnecessary follow up testing, procedures, and treatment. The aim of this quality improvement (QI) study was to improve our understanding of BDG and GM utilization at our institution. METHODS: The test orders for BDG and GM were modified within our electronic medical record (EMR) to provide education and require selection of ordering reason from a list of criteria. Educational sessions were provided to non-transplant provider groups who order BDG and GM frequently. Total number of tests, test results, patient immunosuppressed status, ordering location, and provider specialty were compared for a 3-month period pre/post intervention. Ordering criteria was collected post-intervention. SPSS software was used for chi square tests comparing groups. RESULTS: BDG and GM ordering practices were compared in the pre- and post-intervention timeframes (Table 1). There were no significant differences in the total number of tests, immune status of patients, ordering location or test results for BDG or GM. A significant decrease in hospitalist ordering was found (n=79 (pre), n=48 (post), p=0.006). Positive GM tests were rare in both periods (1.96%, 6/306 and 3.34%, 10/299). Ordering criteria for both tests were also evaluated in the post-intervention period (Table 2). The most common ordering criteria selected for BDG and GM were disseminated fungal infection 275/435 (63%) and invasive aspergillosis 241/299 (81%), respectively. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: Most BDG and GM tests were ordered utilizing appropriate ordering criteria and were among immunosuppressed patients. However, selection of an appropriate reason does not necessarily correlate to obtaining in the appropriate clinical setting. This QI project improved our understanding of how BDG and GM are utilized, and by whom. In the future, these results will be used to provide more targeted education to specific provider groups. In addition, further EMR order entry modifications will focus on potential false positive results to further optimize BDG and GM test utilization. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2022-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9752178/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.239 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Poplin, Victoria
Liesman, Rachael
Bahr, Nathan C
161. Assessing Trends in 1,3-β-D Glucan and Aspergillus Galactomannan Antigen Ordering to Improve Use
title 161. Assessing Trends in 1,3-β-D Glucan and Aspergillus Galactomannan Antigen Ordering to Improve Use
title_full 161. Assessing Trends in 1,3-β-D Glucan and Aspergillus Galactomannan Antigen Ordering to Improve Use
title_fullStr 161. Assessing Trends in 1,3-β-D Glucan and Aspergillus Galactomannan Antigen Ordering to Improve Use
title_full_unstemmed 161. Assessing Trends in 1,3-β-D Glucan and Aspergillus Galactomannan Antigen Ordering to Improve Use
title_short 161. Assessing Trends in 1,3-β-D Glucan and Aspergillus Galactomannan Antigen Ordering to Improve Use
title_sort 161. assessing trends in 1,3-β-d glucan and aspergillus galactomannan antigen ordering to improve use
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752178/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.239
work_keys_str_mv AT poplinvictoria 161assessingtrendsin13bdglucanandaspergillusgalactomannanantigenorderingtoimproveuse
AT liesmanrachael 161assessingtrendsin13bdglucanandaspergillusgalactomannanantigenorderingtoimproveuse
AT bahrnathanc 161assessingtrendsin13bdglucanandaspergillusgalactomannanantigenorderingtoimproveuse