Cargando…

163. Assessment of Pneumonia FilmArray Use on the Impact on Antimicrobial De-escalation Within an Integrated Health System

BACKGROUND: BioFire® FilmArray® Pneumonia Panel (PFA) is a highly sensitive and specific diagnostic tool. PFA has been found to reduce antimicrobial utilization, however, inappropriate use can lead to high positivity rates that often do not correlate with standard cultures. Injudicious PFA utilizati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weichman, Brittani, Bushman, Amanda, Terrero Salcedo, David A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752253/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.241
_version_ 1784850674820841472
author Weichman, Brittani
Bushman, Amanda
Terrero Salcedo, David A
author_facet Weichman, Brittani
Bushman, Amanda
Terrero Salcedo, David A
author_sort Weichman, Brittani
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: BioFire® FilmArray® Pneumonia Panel (PFA) is a highly sensitive and specific diagnostic tool. PFA has been found to reduce antimicrobial utilization, however, inappropriate use can lead to high positivity rates that often do not correlate with standard cultures. Injudicious PFA utilization has been associated with inappropriate antibiotic use. We aimed to evaluate the inpatient utilization of PFA, establish culture correlation and assess clinical decision by ordering providers based on these results. METHODS: Retrospective review and descriptive analysis of adult patients presenting to an integrated health system in the Des Moines Metro, between March 2021 and September 2021, who had a PFA ordered and collected in their hospitalization. Indication, collection date, identified targets of PFA and cultures, antibiotic use, and trends in antibiotic de-escalation were collected. RESULTS: A total of 127 PFA were collected, of which 94 were from sputum (74%) and 33 were from BAL (26%). From PFA done in BAL, 42% were collected outpatient. Timing of PFA collection in relation to admission date is shown in Table 1. Sensitivity of PFA when matched to culture was 90% in sputum vs 67% in BAL, with specificity in sputum of 48% vs 82% in BAL. The overall relative frequency of timing of PFA orders in relation to admission is shown in Figure 1. Of 127 PFA collected, 39 (31%) were on standard therapy for community acquired pneumonia at time of collection and 24/39 (19%) were collected within the first 48 hours of admission. We found that 27 (21%) patients had appropriate changes in antibiotics after PFA results and 42 (33%) were not changed when it was considered appropriate to do so. Out of 72 patients with negative PFA, 30 (42%) had no change in antibiotics. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: PFA collected early in the hospitalization did not result in antibiotic de-escalation when appropriate and many times was ordered when results would not lead to de-escalation due to narrow standard of care therapy already in use. Within our health system, PFA is not adequately utilized to support decisions for antimicrobial de-escalation. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9752253
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97522532022-12-16 163. Assessment of Pneumonia FilmArray Use on the Impact on Antimicrobial De-escalation Within an Integrated Health System Weichman, Brittani Bushman, Amanda Terrero Salcedo, David A Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: BioFire® FilmArray® Pneumonia Panel (PFA) is a highly sensitive and specific diagnostic tool. PFA has been found to reduce antimicrobial utilization, however, inappropriate use can lead to high positivity rates that often do not correlate with standard cultures. Injudicious PFA utilization has been associated with inappropriate antibiotic use. We aimed to evaluate the inpatient utilization of PFA, establish culture correlation and assess clinical decision by ordering providers based on these results. METHODS: Retrospective review and descriptive analysis of adult patients presenting to an integrated health system in the Des Moines Metro, between March 2021 and September 2021, who had a PFA ordered and collected in their hospitalization. Indication, collection date, identified targets of PFA and cultures, antibiotic use, and trends in antibiotic de-escalation were collected. RESULTS: A total of 127 PFA were collected, of which 94 were from sputum (74%) and 33 were from BAL (26%). From PFA done in BAL, 42% were collected outpatient. Timing of PFA collection in relation to admission date is shown in Table 1. Sensitivity of PFA when matched to culture was 90% in sputum vs 67% in BAL, with specificity in sputum of 48% vs 82% in BAL. The overall relative frequency of timing of PFA orders in relation to admission is shown in Figure 1. Of 127 PFA collected, 39 (31%) were on standard therapy for community acquired pneumonia at time of collection and 24/39 (19%) were collected within the first 48 hours of admission. We found that 27 (21%) patients had appropriate changes in antibiotics after PFA results and 42 (33%) were not changed when it was considered appropriate to do so. Out of 72 patients with negative PFA, 30 (42%) had no change in antibiotics. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: PFA collected early in the hospitalization did not result in antibiotic de-escalation when appropriate and many times was ordered when results would not lead to de-escalation due to narrow standard of care therapy already in use. Within our health system, PFA is not adequately utilized to support decisions for antimicrobial de-escalation. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2022-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9752253/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.241 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Weichman, Brittani
Bushman, Amanda
Terrero Salcedo, David A
163. Assessment of Pneumonia FilmArray Use on the Impact on Antimicrobial De-escalation Within an Integrated Health System
title 163. Assessment of Pneumonia FilmArray Use on the Impact on Antimicrobial De-escalation Within an Integrated Health System
title_full 163. Assessment of Pneumonia FilmArray Use on the Impact on Antimicrobial De-escalation Within an Integrated Health System
title_fullStr 163. Assessment of Pneumonia FilmArray Use on the Impact on Antimicrobial De-escalation Within an Integrated Health System
title_full_unstemmed 163. Assessment of Pneumonia FilmArray Use on the Impact on Antimicrobial De-escalation Within an Integrated Health System
title_short 163. Assessment of Pneumonia FilmArray Use on the Impact on Antimicrobial De-escalation Within an Integrated Health System
title_sort 163. assessment of pneumonia filmarray use on the impact on antimicrobial de-escalation within an integrated health system
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752253/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.241
work_keys_str_mv AT weichmanbrittani 163assessmentofpneumoniafilmarrayuseontheimpactonantimicrobialdeescalationwithinanintegratedhealthsystem
AT bushmanamanda 163assessmentofpneumoniafilmarrayuseontheimpactonantimicrobialdeescalationwithinanintegratedhealthsystem
AT terrerosalcedodavida 163assessmentofpneumoniafilmarrayuseontheimpactonantimicrobialdeescalationwithinanintegratedhealthsystem