Cargando…
515. Comparing Different Delivery Methods of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation
BACKGROUND: The increasing prevalence of multi-drug resistant organism (MDRO) carriage imposes significant medical challenges by increasing healthcare costs. Since MDRO carriage impacts treatment outcome and prognosis, many decolonization strategies were proposed but were not as effective as expecte...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752283/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.571 |
_version_ | 1784850682423017472 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Eun Hwa Lee, Ki Hyun Kim, Jinnam Ju Lee, Se Kim, Jung Ho Ahn, Jin Young Jeong, Su Jin Ku, Nam Su Yeom, Joon-sup Choi, Jun Yong |
author_facet | Lee, Eun Hwa Lee, Ki Hyun Kim, Jinnam Ju Lee, Se Kim, Jung Ho Ahn, Jin Young Jeong, Su Jin Ku, Nam Su Yeom, Joon-sup Choi, Jun Yong |
author_sort | Lee, Eun Hwa |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The increasing prevalence of multi-drug resistant organism (MDRO) carriage imposes significant medical challenges by increasing healthcare costs. Since MDRO carriage impacts treatment outcome and prognosis, many decolonization strategies were proposed but were not as effective as expected. Recently, fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been discussed as a novel and effective method of MDRO decolonization. In this study, we compared the effectiveness of different FMT delivery methods to find suitable methods and optimize the success rate of decolonization for the patients with MDRO carriage. [Figure: see text] METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, we enrolled patients with MDRO carriage from 2018 to 2021. Patients received FMT via one of the four following methods; oral capsule, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, colonoscopy, or gastric tube. FMT delivery method was chosen according to the medical condition or eligibility for oral diet. The participants were followed up for one year. Decolonization and recolonization with MDRO were determined by the follow-up stool cultures. Microbiome analysis was done to assess the successful restoration of the gut microbiome. RESULTS: A total of 57 patients received FMT for MDRO decolonization. The number of patients who received FMT via oral capsule, EGD, colonoscopy, and gastric tubes was 14, 9, 23, and 11. The overall decolonization rate was 69.2%, and the recolonization rate was 19.3%. The colonoscopy group required the shortest time for decolonization, while the EGD group was the longest (24.9 vs. 190.4 days, p-value=0.022). The decolonization rate was the highest in the EGD group (85.7%) and the lowest in the gastric tube group (50.5%). The oral capsule group had a comparable decolonization rate to the EGD group (84.6% vs. 85.7%, p=0.730). The clinical factor associated with decolonization was antibiotic usage after FMT (Odds ratio= 6.810, p-value=0.008). Microbiome analysis data showed improvement in alpha index in the Oral capsule and the EGD group. All four groups showed a reduced proportion of MDRO species after FMT. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] Comparison of ACE index of Taxonomic data with different FMT modalities [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: The oral capsule is an effective FMT method for patients who are tolerable to an oral diet compared to the other conventional methods. Discontinuation of antibiotics after FMT is critical in decolonization. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9752283 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97522832022-12-16 515. Comparing Different Delivery Methods of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Lee, Eun Hwa Lee, Ki Hyun Kim, Jinnam Ju Lee, Se Kim, Jung Ho Ahn, Jin Young Jeong, Su Jin Ku, Nam Su Yeom, Joon-sup Choi, Jun Yong Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: The increasing prevalence of multi-drug resistant organism (MDRO) carriage imposes significant medical challenges by increasing healthcare costs. Since MDRO carriage impacts treatment outcome and prognosis, many decolonization strategies were proposed but were not as effective as expected. Recently, fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been discussed as a novel and effective method of MDRO decolonization. In this study, we compared the effectiveness of different FMT delivery methods to find suitable methods and optimize the success rate of decolonization for the patients with MDRO carriage. [Figure: see text] METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, we enrolled patients with MDRO carriage from 2018 to 2021. Patients received FMT via one of the four following methods; oral capsule, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, colonoscopy, or gastric tube. FMT delivery method was chosen according to the medical condition or eligibility for oral diet. The participants were followed up for one year. Decolonization and recolonization with MDRO were determined by the follow-up stool cultures. Microbiome analysis was done to assess the successful restoration of the gut microbiome. RESULTS: A total of 57 patients received FMT for MDRO decolonization. The number of patients who received FMT via oral capsule, EGD, colonoscopy, and gastric tubes was 14, 9, 23, and 11. The overall decolonization rate was 69.2%, and the recolonization rate was 19.3%. The colonoscopy group required the shortest time for decolonization, while the EGD group was the longest (24.9 vs. 190.4 days, p-value=0.022). The decolonization rate was the highest in the EGD group (85.7%) and the lowest in the gastric tube group (50.5%). The oral capsule group had a comparable decolonization rate to the EGD group (84.6% vs. 85.7%, p=0.730). The clinical factor associated with decolonization was antibiotic usage after FMT (Odds ratio= 6.810, p-value=0.008). Microbiome analysis data showed improvement in alpha index in the Oral capsule and the EGD group. All four groups showed a reduced proportion of MDRO species after FMT. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] Comparison of ACE index of Taxonomic data with different FMT modalities [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: The oral capsule is an effective FMT method for patients who are tolerable to an oral diet compared to the other conventional methods. Discontinuation of antibiotics after FMT is critical in decolonization. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2022-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9752283/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.571 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Lee, Eun Hwa Lee, Ki Hyun Kim, Jinnam Ju Lee, Se Kim, Jung Ho Ahn, Jin Young Jeong, Su Jin Ku, Nam Su Yeom, Joon-sup Choi, Jun Yong 515. Comparing Different Delivery Methods of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation |
title | 515. Comparing Different Delivery Methods of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation |
title_full | 515. Comparing Different Delivery Methods of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation |
title_fullStr | 515. Comparing Different Delivery Methods of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation |
title_full_unstemmed | 515. Comparing Different Delivery Methods of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation |
title_short | 515. Comparing Different Delivery Methods of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation |
title_sort | 515. comparing different delivery methods of fecal microbiota transplantation |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752283/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.571 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leeeunhwa 515comparingdifferentdeliverymethodsoffecalmicrobiotatransplantation AT leekihyun 515comparingdifferentdeliverymethodsoffecalmicrobiotatransplantation AT kimjinnam 515comparingdifferentdeliverymethodsoffecalmicrobiotatransplantation AT juleese 515comparingdifferentdeliverymethodsoffecalmicrobiotatransplantation AT kimjungho 515comparingdifferentdeliverymethodsoffecalmicrobiotatransplantation AT ahnjinyoung 515comparingdifferentdeliverymethodsoffecalmicrobiotatransplantation AT jeongsujin 515comparingdifferentdeliverymethodsoffecalmicrobiotatransplantation AT kunamsu 515comparingdifferentdeliverymethodsoffecalmicrobiotatransplantation AT yeomjoonsup 515comparingdifferentdeliverymethodsoffecalmicrobiotatransplantation AT choijunyong 515comparingdifferentdeliverymethodsoffecalmicrobiotatransplantation |