Cargando…

515. Comparing Different Delivery Methods of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation

BACKGROUND: The increasing prevalence of multi-drug resistant organism (MDRO) carriage imposes significant medical challenges by increasing healthcare costs. Since MDRO carriage impacts treatment outcome and prognosis, many decolonization strategies were proposed but were not as effective as expecte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Eun Hwa, Lee, Ki Hyun, Kim, Jinnam, Ju Lee, Se, Kim, Jung Ho, Ahn, Jin Young, Jeong, Su Jin, Ku, Nam Su, Yeom, Joon-sup, Choi, Jun Yong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752283/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.571
_version_ 1784850682423017472
author Lee, Eun Hwa
Lee, Ki Hyun
Kim, Jinnam
Ju Lee, Se
Kim, Jung Ho
Ahn, Jin Young
Jeong, Su Jin
Ku, Nam Su
Yeom, Joon-sup
Choi, Jun Yong
author_facet Lee, Eun Hwa
Lee, Ki Hyun
Kim, Jinnam
Ju Lee, Se
Kim, Jung Ho
Ahn, Jin Young
Jeong, Su Jin
Ku, Nam Su
Yeom, Joon-sup
Choi, Jun Yong
author_sort Lee, Eun Hwa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The increasing prevalence of multi-drug resistant organism (MDRO) carriage imposes significant medical challenges by increasing healthcare costs. Since MDRO carriage impacts treatment outcome and prognosis, many decolonization strategies were proposed but were not as effective as expected. Recently, fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been discussed as a novel and effective method of MDRO decolonization. In this study, we compared the effectiveness of different FMT delivery methods to find suitable methods and optimize the success rate of decolonization for the patients with MDRO carriage. [Figure: see text] METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, we enrolled patients with MDRO carriage from 2018 to 2021. Patients received FMT via one of the four following methods; oral capsule, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, colonoscopy, or gastric tube. FMT delivery method was chosen according to the medical condition or eligibility for oral diet. The participants were followed up for one year. Decolonization and recolonization with MDRO were determined by the follow-up stool cultures. Microbiome analysis was done to assess the successful restoration of the gut microbiome. RESULTS: A total of 57 patients received FMT for MDRO decolonization. The number of patients who received FMT via oral capsule, EGD, colonoscopy, and gastric tubes was 14, 9, 23, and 11. The overall decolonization rate was 69.2%, and the recolonization rate was 19.3%. The colonoscopy group required the shortest time for decolonization, while the EGD group was the longest (24.9 vs. 190.4 days, p-value=0.022). The decolonization rate was the highest in the EGD group (85.7%) and the lowest in the gastric tube group (50.5%). The oral capsule group had a comparable decolonization rate to the EGD group (84.6% vs. 85.7%, p=0.730). The clinical factor associated with decolonization was antibiotic usage after FMT (Odds ratio= 6.810, p-value=0.008). Microbiome analysis data showed improvement in alpha index in the Oral capsule and the EGD group. All four groups showed a reduced proportion of MDRO species after FMT. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] Comparison of ACE index of Taxonomic data with different FMT modalities [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: The oral capsule is an effective FMT method for patients who are tolerable to an oral diet compared to the other conventional methods. Discontinuation of antibiotics after FMT is critical in decolonization. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9752283
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97522832022-12-16 515. Comparing Different Delivery Methods of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Lee, Eun Hwa Lee, Ki Hyun Kim, Jinnam Ju Lee, Se Kim, Jung Ho Ahn, Jin Young Jeong, Su Jin Ku, Nam Su Yeom, Joon-sup Choi, Jun Yong Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: The increasing prevalence of multi-drug resistant organism (MDRO) carriage imposes significant medical challenges by increasing healthcare costs. Since MDRO carriage impacts treatment outcome and prognosis, many decolonization strategies were proposed but were not as effective as expected. Recently, fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been discussed as a novel and effective method of MDRO decolonization. In this study, we compared the effectiveness of different FMT delivery methods to find suitable methods and optimize the success rate of decolonization for the patients with MDRO carriage. [Figure: see text] METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, we enrolled patients with MDRO carriage from 2018 to 2021. Patients received FMT via one of the four following methods; oral capsule, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, colonoscopy, or gastric tube. FMT delivery method was chosen according to the medical condition or eligibility for oral diet. The participants were followed up for one year. Decolonization and recolonization with MDRO were determined by the follow-up stool cultures. Microbiome analysis was done to assess the successful restoration of the gut microbiome. RESULTS: A total of 57 patients received FMT for MDRO decolonization. The number of patients who received FMT via oral capsule, EGD, colonoscopy, and gastric tubes was 14, 9, 23, and 11. The overall decolonization rate was 69.2%, and the recolonization rate was 19.3%. The colonoscopy group required the shortest time for decolonization, while the EGD group was the longest (24.9 vs. 190.4 days, p-value=0.022). The decolonization rate was the highest in the EGD group (85.7%) and the lowest in the gastric tube group (50.5%). The oral capsule group had a comparable decolonization rate to the EGD group (84.6% vs. 85.7%, p=0.730). The clinical factor associated with decolonization was antibiotic usage after FMT (Odds ratio= 6.810, p-value=0.008). Microbiome analysis data showed improvement in alpha index in the Oral capsule and the EGD group. All four groups showed a reduced proportion of MDRO species after FMT. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] Comparison of ACE index of Taxonomic data with different FMT modalities [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: The oral capsule is an effective FMT method for patients who are tolerable to an oral diet compared to the other conventional methods. Discontinuation of antibiotics after FMT is critical in decolonization. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2022-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9752283/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.571 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Lee, Eun Hwa
Lee, Ki Hyun
Kim, Jinnam
Ju Lee, Se
Kim, Jung Ho
Ahn, Jin Young
Jeong, Su Jin
Ku, Nam Su
Yeom, Joon-sup
Choi, Jun Yong
515. Comparing Different Delivery Methods of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation
title 515. Comparing Different Delivery Methods of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation
title_full 515. Comparing Different Delivery Methods of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation
title_fullStr 515. Comparing Different Delivery Methods of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation
title_full_unstemmed 515. Comparing Different Delivery Methods of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation
title_short 515. Comparing Different Delivery Methods of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation
title_sort 515. comparing different delivery methods of fecal microbiota transplantation
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752283/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.571
work_keys_str_mv AT leeeunhwa 515comparingdifferentdeliverymethodsoffecalmicrobiotatransplantation
AT leekihyun 515comparingdifferentdeliverymethodsoffecalmicrobiotatransplantation
AT kimjinnam 515comparingdifferentdeliverymethodsoffecalmicrobiotatransplantation
AT juleese 515comparingdifferentdeliverymethodsoffecalmicrobiotatransplantation
AT kimjungho 515comparingdifferentdeliverymethodsoffecalmicrobiotatransplantation
AT ahnjinyoung 515comparingdifferentdeliverymethodsoffecalmicrobiotatransplantation
AT jeongsujin 515comparingdifferentdeliverymethodsoffecalmicrobiotatransplantation
AT kunamsu 515comparingdifferentdeliverymethodsoffecalmicrobiotatransplantation
AT yeomjoonsup 515comparingdifferentdeliverymethodsoffecalmicrobiotatransplantation
AT choijunyong 515comparingdifferentdeliverymethodsoffecalmicrobiotatransplantation