Cargando…

1150. Resistance Analysis in the COMET-TAIL Study: Participants with Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19 Treated with Intramuscular or Intravenous Sotrovimab

BACKGROUND: Sotrovimab (VIR-7831) is an engineered human monoclonal antibody targeting a conserved region of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein; it has been shown to have a favorable safety profile and be effective for early treatment of high-risk COVID-19 patients. The COMET-TAIL phase 3 study evaluated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Agostini, Maria L, Schnell, Gretja, di Iulio, Julia, Kohli, Anita, Shapiro, Adrienne E, Sarkis, Elias H, Inman, Dave, Peppercorn, Amanda, Skingsley, Andrew, Gaffney, Leah A, Aldinger, Melissa, Hebner, Christy M, Cathcart, Andrea L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752326/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.988
_version_ 1784850694219497472
author Agostini, Maria L
Schnell, Gretja
di Iulio, Julia
Kohli, Anita
Shapiro, Adrienne E
Sarkis, Elias H
Inman, Dave
Peppercorn, Amanda
Skingsley, Andrew
Gaffney, Leah A
Aldinger, Melissa
Hebner, Christy M
Cathcart, Andrea L
author_facet Agostini, Maria L
Schnell, Gretja
di Iulio, Julia
Kohli, Anita
Shapiro, Adrienne E
Sarkis, Elias H
Inman, Dave
Peppercorn, Amanda
Skingsley, Andrew
Gaffney, Leah A
Aldinger, Melissa
Hebner, Christy M
Cathcart, Andrea L
author_sort Agostini, Maria L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sotrovimab (VIR-7831) is an engineered human monoclonal antibody targeting a conserved region of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein; it has been shown to have a favorable safety profile and be effective for early treatment of high-risk COVID-19 patients. The COMET-TAIL phase 3 study evaluated sotrovimab administered intravenously (IV) or intramuscularly (IM) for the treatment of participants with mild to moderate COVID-19 who are at high risk of disease progression. METHODS: Between June to August 2021, 973 participants were randomized and received sotrovimab by 500 mg IV infusion or by 500 or 250 mg IM injection. Deep sequencing of the spike gene was performed on nasopharyngeal samples. Baseline (BL; Day 1 or Day 3), post-BL (Day 5 or later), treatment-emergent (TE) substitutions at sotrovimab epitope positions, and presence of variants of concern/interest (VOC/VOI), were evaluated at a ≥5% allelic frequency. Phenotypic analyses were conducted using a pseudotyped virus assay. RESULTS: Sequences were available from 764 participants (500 mg IV: 314/393; 500 mg IM: 302/387; 250 mg IM: 148/193). Consistent with VOC circulation during enrollment, the Delta variant was detected in 88.2% (674/764) of participants. Alpha and Mu variants were also seen at >2% prevalence. Of the 764 participants, 26 met the primary endpoint for clinical progression to hospitalization >24 hours or death due to any cause through day 29 and were infected with Delta (500 mg IV: 4; 500 mg IM: 9; 250 mg IM: 11), Alpha (500 mg IM: 1), or Mu (500 mg IV: 1) variants. Substitutions at sotrovimab epitope positions were similar across arms and were detected in 82/764 (10.7%) participants at any visit (500 mg IV: 42/314; 500 mg IM: 27/302; 250 mg IM: 13/148). Of these, 2 participants experienced clinical progression: 1 participant infected with the Mu variant (500 mg IV) carried the characteristic R346K substitution at BL; 1 participant infected with the Delta variant (500 mg IM) had P337L and E340K substitutions detected at Day 3 and P337L was enriched at Day 8. The predominant TE epitope substitutions included P337L and E340A/K/V, which confer reduced susceptibility to sotrovimab in vitro. CONCLUSION: Overall, TE epitope substitutions were not associated with clinical progression. FUNDING: Vir & GSK (NCT04913675) DISCLOSURES: Maria L. Agostini, PhD, Vir Biotechnology, Inc: Employee|Vir Biotechnology, Inc: Stocks/Bonds Gretja Schnell, PhD, Vir Biotechnology: Employee|Vir Biotechnology: Stocks/Bonds Julia di Iulio, PharmD, PhD, MBA, Vir Biotechnology: Employee|Vir Biotechnology: Stocks/Bonds Anita Kohli, MD, GlaxoSmithKline: Third party funding to Vir|Vir Biotechnology Inc: Support as a trial site paid to my institution and non-financial support for medical writing support Adrienne E. Shapiro, MD, PhD, Vir Biotechnology: Support as a trial site paid to my institution and non-financial support for medical writing GlaxoSmithKline third party funding to Vir support Elias H. Sarkis, MD, Abbvie: Grant/Research Support|Abbvie: Speakers Bureau|Eisai: Grant/Research Support|GlaxoSmithKline: Third party funding to Vir|Ironshore: Grant/Research Support|Janssen: Speakers Bureau|Lilly: Grant/Research Support|Otsuka: Grant/Research Support|Teva: Speakers Bureau|Vir Biotechnology Inc: Support as a trial site paid to my institution and non-financial support for medical writing support Dave Inman, MSc, GlaxoSmithKline: Employee|GlaxoSmithKline: Stocks/Bonds Amanda Peppercorn, MD, GlaxoSmithKline: Employee|GlaxoSmithKline: Stocks/Bonds Andrew Skingsley, MD, GlaxoSmithKline: Employee|GlaxoSmithKline: Stocks/Bonds Leah A. Gaffney, PhD, Vir Biotechnology: Employee|Vir Biotechnology: Stocks/Bonds Melissa Aldinger, PharmD, Vir Biotechnology: Employee|Vir Biotechnology: Stocks/Bonds Christy M. Hebner, PhD, Vir Biotechnology: Employee|Vir Biotechnology: Stocks/Bonds Andrea L. Cathcart, PhD, Vir Biotechnology: Employee|Vir Biotechnology: Stocks/Bonds.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9752326
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97523262022-12-16 1150. Resistance Analysis in the COMET-TAIL Study: Participants with Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19 Treated with Intramuscular or Intravenous Sotrovimab Agostini, Maria L Schnell, Gretja di Iulio, Julia Kohli, Anita Shapiro, Adrienne E Sarkis, Elias H Inman, Dave Peppercorn, Amanda Skingsley, Andrew Gaffney, Leah A Aldinger, Melissa Hebner, Christy M Cathcart, Andrea L Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Sotrovimab (VIR-7831) is an engineered human monoclonal antibody targeting a conserved region of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein; it has been shown to have a favorable safety profile and be effective for early treatment of high-risk COVID-19 patients. The COMET-TAIL phase 3 study evaluated sotrovimab administered intravenously (IV) or intramuscularly (IM) for the treatment of participants with mild to moderate COVID-19 who are at high risk of disease progression. METHODS: Between June to August 2021, 973 participants were randomized and received sotrovimab by 500 mg IV infusion or by 500 or 250 mg IM injection. Deep sequencing of the spike gene was performed on nasopharyngeal samples. Baseline (BL; Day 1 or Day 3), post-BL (Day 5 or later), treatment-emergent (TE) substitutions at sotrovimab epitope positions, and presence of variants of concern/interest (VOC/VOI), were evaluated at a ≥5% allelic frequency. Phenotypic analyses were conducted using a pseudotyped virus assay. RESULTS: Sequences were available from 764 participants (500 mg IV: 314/393; 500 mg IM: 302/387; 250 mg IM: 148/193). Consistent with VOC circulation during enrollment, the Delta variant was detected in 88.2% (674/764) of participants. Alpha and Mu variants were also seen at >2% prevalence. Of the 764 participants, 26 met the primary endpoint for clinical progression to hospitalization >24 hours or death due to any cause through day 29 and were infected with Delta (500 mg IV: 4; 500 mg IM: 9; 250 mg IM: 11), Alpha (500 mg IM: 1), or Mu (500 mg IV: 1) variants. Substitutions at sotrovimab epitope positions were similar across arms and were detected in 82/764 (10.7%) participants at any visit (500 mg IV: 42/314; 500 mg IM: 27/302; 250 mg IM: 13/148). Of these, 2 participants experienced clinical progression: 1 participant infected with the Mu variant (500 mg IV) carried the characteristic R346K substitution at BL; 1 participant infected with the Delta variant (500 mg IM) had P337L and E340K substitutions detected at Day 3 and P337L was enriched at Day 8. The predominant TE epitope substitutions included P337L and E340A/K/V, which confer reduced susceptibility to sotrovimab in vitro. CONCLUSION: Overall, TE epitope substitutions were not associated with clinical progression. FUNDING: Vir & GSK (NCT04913675) DISCLOSURES: Maria L. Agostini, PhD, Vir Biotechnology, Inc: Employee|Vir Biotechnology, Inc: Stocks/Bonds Gretja Schnell, PhD, Vir Biotechnology: Employee|Vir Biotechnology: Stocks/Bonds Julia di Iulio, PharmD, PhD, MBA, Vir Biotechnology: Employee|Vir Biotechnology: Stocks/Bonds Anita Kohli, MD, GlaxoSmithKline: Third party funding to Vir|Vir Biotechnology Inc: Support as a trial site paid to my institution and non-financial support for medical writing support Adrienne E. Shapiro, MD, PhD, Vir Biotechnology: Support as a trial site paid to my institution and non-financial support for medical writing GlaxoSmithKline third party funding to Vir support Elias H. Sarkis, MD, Abbvie: Grant/Research Support|Abbvie: Speakers Bureau|Eisai: Grant/Research Support|GlaxoSmithKline: Third party funding to Vir|Ironshore: Grant/Research Support|Janssen: Speakers Bureau|Lilly: Grant/Research Support|Otsuka: Grant/Research Support|Teva: Speakers Bureau|Vir Biotechnology Inc: Support as a trial site paid to my institution and non-financial support for medical writing support Dave Inman, MSc, GlaxoSmithKline: Employee|GlaxoSmithKline: Stocks/Bonds Amanda Peppercorn, MD, GlaxoSmithKline: Employee|GlaxoSmithKline: Stocks/Bonds Andrew Skingsley, MD, GlaxoSmithKline: Employee|GlaxoSmithKline: Stocks/Bonds Leah A. Gaffney, PhD, Vir Biotechnology: Employee|Vir Biotechnology: Stocks/Bonds Melissa Aldinger, PharmD, Vir Biotechnology: Employee|Vir Biotechnology: Stocks/Bonds Christy M. Hebner, PhD, Vir Biotechnology: Employee|Vir Biotechnology: Stocks/Bonds Andrea L. Cathcart, PhD, Vir Biotechnology: Employee|Vir Biotechnology: Stocks/Bonds. Oxford University Press 2022-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9752326/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.988 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Agostini, Maria L
Schnell, Gretja
di Iulio, Julia
Kohli, Anita
Shapiro, Adrienne E
Sarkis, Elias H
Inman, Dave
Peppercorn, Amanda
Skingsley, Andrew
Gaffney, Leah A
Aldinger, Melissa
Hebner, Christy M
Cathcart, Andrea L
1150. Resistance Analysis in the COMET-TAIL Study: Participants with Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19 Treated with Intramuscular or Intravenous Sotrovimab
title 1150. Resistance Analysis in the COMET-TAIL Study: Participants with Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19 Treated with Intramuscular or Intravenous Sotrovimab
title_full 1150. Resistance Analysis in the COMET-TAIL Study: Participants with Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19 Treated with Intramuscular or Intravenous Sotrovimab
title_fullStr 1150. Resistance Analysis in the COMET-TAIL Study: Participants with Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19 Treated with Intramuscular or Intravenous Sotrovimab
title_full_unstemmed 1150. Resistance Analysis in the COMET-TAIL Study: Participants with Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19 Treated with Intramuscular or Intravenous Sotrovimab
title_short 1150. Resistance Analysis in the COMET-TAIL Study: Participants with Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19 Treated with Intramuscular or Intravenous Sotrovimab
title_sort 1150. resistance analysis in the comet-tail study: participants with mild-to-moderate covid-19 treated with intramuscular or intravenous sotrovimab
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752326/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.988
work_keys_str_mv AT agostinimarial 1150resistanceanalysisinthecomettailstudyparticipantswithmildtomoderatecovid19treatedwithintramuscularorintravenoussotrovimab
AT schnellgretja 1150resistanceanalysisinthecomettailstudyparticipantswithmildtomoderatecovid19treatedwithintramuscularorintravenoussotrovimab
AT diiuliojulia 1150resistanceanalysisinthecomettailstudyparticipantswithmildtomoderatecovid19treatedwithintramuscularorintravenoussotrovimab
AT kohlianita 1150resistanceanalysisinthecomettailstudyparticipantswithmildtomoderatecovid19treatedwithintramuscularorintravenoussotrovimab
AT shapiroadriennee 1150resistanceanalysisinthecomettailstudyparticipantswithmildtomoderatecovid19treatedwithintramuscularorintravenoussotrovimab
AT sarkiseliash 1150resistanceanalysisinthecomettailstudyparticipantswithmildtomoderatecovid19treatedwithintramuscularorintravenoussotrovimab
AT inmandave 1150resistanceanalysisinthecomettailstudyparticipantswithmildtomoderatecovid19treatedwithintramuscularorintravenoussotrovimab
AT peppercornamanda 1150resistanceanalysisinthecomettailstudyparticipantswithmildtomoderatecovid19treatedwithintramuscularorintravenoussotrovimab
AT skingsleyandrew 1150resistanceanalysisinthecomettailstudyparticipantswithmildtomoderatecovid19treatedwithintramuscularorintravenoussotrovimab
AT gaffneyleaha 1150resistanceanalysisinthecomettailstudyparticipantswithmildtomoderatecovid19treatedwithintramuscularorintravenoussotrovimab
AT aldingermelissa 1150resistanceanalysisinthecomettailstudyparticipantswithmildtomoderatecovid19treatedwithintramuscularorintravenoussotrovimab
AT hebnerchristym 1150resistanceanalysisinthecomettailstudyparticipantswithmildtomoderatecovid19treatedwithintramuscularorintravenoussotrovimab
AT cathcartandreal 1150resistanceanalysisinthecomettailstudyparticipantswithmildtomoderatecovid19treatedwithintramuscularorintravenoussotrovimab