Cargando…

397. Oral Vancomycin Versus Fidaxomicin for Clostridiodes difficile: A Comparative Retrospective Evaluation across a Large, Multi-center Healthcare System

BACKGROUND: The Infectious Diseases Society of America and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America recently published the 2021 Focused Clinical Practice Guideline Update on Management of Clostridioides difficile in Adults that recommends fidaxomicin as a preferred treatment for initial and re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roemer, Kaleb, Burgess, Hayley, Sands, Kenneth E, Hodgin, Ryan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752353/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.475
_version_ 1784850701658095616
author Roemer, Kaleb
Burgess, Hayley
Sands, Kenneth E
Hodgin, Ryan
author_facet Roemer, Kaleb
Burgess, Hayley
Sands, Kenneth E
Hodgin, Ryan
author_sort Roemer, Kaleb
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Infectious Diseases Society of America and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America recently published the 2021 Focused Clinical Practice Guideline Update on Management of Clostridioides difficile in Adults that recommends fidaxomicin as a preferred treatment for initial and recurrent C. difficile infection (CDI) over oral vancomycin. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes of adult inpatients with CDI diagnosis treated with fidaxomicin versus oral or rectal vancomycin. METHODS: The patient population included adult inpatients 18 years or older admitted to a hospital within the healthcare system with CDI International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes from January 1, 2017 to October 31, 2021. Data was obtained for inpatients with a discharge diagnosis of CDI and receiving fidaxomicin, oral or rectal vancomycin, or no receipt of either antibiotic. Readmission was defined as readmittance to the healthcare system within 8 weeks and a CDI diagnosis. Recurrence risk factors were defined as age 65 years or older, immunocompromised based on ICD-10 codes, and severe CDI defined as white blood cell count > 15 cells/mm(3) PLUS serum creatinine > 1.5 mg/dL. RESULTS: More than 45,000 inpatients with a CDI diagnosis were evaluated. Administration rates of vancomycin, fidaxomicin, or no receipt of either was 76%, 6% and 18%, respectively. Median length of stay for vancomycin compared to fidaxomicin was 7 versus 9 days, respectively. Readmission rate was lower for total inpatients receiving vancomycin (14.6%) compared to fidaxomicin (18.5%), showing statistical significance (p < 0.0000005). Subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate inpatients with risk factors for CDI recurrence. Vancomycin had a lower readmission rate for all recurrence risk factor groups. Additionally, oral vancomycin had lower readmission rates for patients with more than one risk factor (13.4% vs. 16.1%). CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrated that fidaxomicin did not result in a shorter length of stay or lower readmission rate compared to oral/rectal vancomycin. This study supports the continued use of oral/rectal vancomycin for CDI without preference for fidaxomicin. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9752353
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97523532022-12-16 397. Oral Vancomycin Versus Fidaxomicin for Clostridiodes difficile: A Comparative Retrospective Evaluation across a Large, Multi-center Healthcare System Roemer, Kaleb Burgess, Hayley Sands, Kenneth E Hodgin, Ryan Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: The Infectious Diseases Society of America and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America recently published the 2021 Focused Clinical Practice Guideline Update on Management of Clostridioides difficile in Adults that recommends fidaxomicin as a preferred treatment for initial and recurrent C. difficile infection (CDI) over oral vancomycin. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes of adult inpatients with CDI diagnosis treated with fidaxomicin versus oral or rectal vancomycin. METHODS: The patient population included adult inpatients 18 years or older admitted to a hospital within the healthcare system with CDI International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes from January 1, 2017 to October 31, 2021. Data was obtained for inpatients with a discharge diagnosis of CDI and receiving fidaxomicin, oral or rectal vancomycin, or no receipt of either antibiotic. Readmission was defined as readmittance to the healthcare system within 8 weeks and a CDI diagnosis. Recurrence risk factors were defined as age 65 years or older, immunocompromised based on ICD-10 codes, and severe CDI defined as white blood cell count > 15 cells/mm(3) PLUS serum creatinine > 1.5 mg/dL. RESULTS: More than 45,000 inpatients with a CDI diagnosis were evaluated. Administration rates of vancomycin, fidaxomicin, or no receipt of either was 76%, 6% and 18%, respectively. Median length of stay for vancomycin compared to fidaxomicin was 7 versus 9 days, respectively. Readmission rate was lower for total inpatients receiving vancomycin (14.6%) compared to fidaxomicin (18.5%), showing statistical significance (p < 0.0000005). Subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate inpatients with risk factors for CDI recurrence. Vancomycin had a lower readmission rate for all recurrence risk factor groups. Additionally, oral vancomycin had lower readmission rates for patients with more than one risk factor (13.4% vs. 16.1%). CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrated that fidaxomicin did not result in a shorter length of stay or lower readmission rate compared to oral/rectal vancomycin. This study supports the continued use of oral/rectal vancomycin for CDI without preference for fidaxomicin. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2022-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9752353/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.475 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Roemer, Kaleb
Burgess, Hayley
Sands, Kenneth E
Hodgin, Ryan
397. Oral Vancomycin Versus Fidaxomicin for Clostridiodes difficile: A Comparative Retrospective Evaluation across a Large, Multi-center Healthcare System
title 397. Oral Vancomycin Versus Fidaxomicin for Clostridiodes difficile: A Comparative Retrospective Evaluation across a Large, Multi-center Healthcare System
title_full 397. Oral Vancomycin Versus Fidaxomicin for Clostridiodes difficile: A Comparative Retrospective Evaluation across a Large, Multi-center Healthcare System
title_fullStr 397. Oral Vancomycin Versus Fidaxomicin for Clostridiodes difficile: A Comparative Retrospective Evaluation across a Large, Multi-center Healthcare System
title_full_unstemmed 397. Oral Vancomycin Versus Fidaxomicin for Clostridiodes difficile: A Comparative Retrospective Evaluation across a Large, Multi-center Healthcare System
title_short 397. Oral Vancomycin Versus Fidaxomicin for Clostridiodes difficile: A Comparative Retrospective Evaluation across a Large, Multi-center Healthcare System
title_sort 397. oral vancomycin versus fidaxomicin for clostridiodes difficile: a comparative retrospective evaluation across a large, multi-center healthcare system
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752353/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.475
work_keys_str_mv AT roemerkaleb 397oralvancomycinversusfidaxomicinforclostridiodesdifficileacomparativeretrospectiveevaluationacrossalargemulticenterhealthcaresystem
AT burgesshayley 397oralvancomycinversusfidaxomicinforclostridiodesdifficileacomparativeretrospectiveevaluationacrossalargemulticenterhealthcaresystem
AT sandskennethe 397oralvancomycinversusfidaxomicinforclostridiodesdifficileacomparativeretrospectiveevaluationacrossalargemulticenterhealthcaresystem
AT hodginryan 397oralvancomycinversusfidaxomicinforclostridiodesdifficileacomparativeretrospectiveevaluationacrossalargemulticenterhealthcaresystem