Cargando…

184. Impact of the BioFire® FilmArray® Blood Culture Identification 2 Panel on Antimicrobial Treatment of Enterobacterales Blood Stream Infections

BACKGROUND: The BioFire® FilmArray® Blood Culture Identification 2 (BCID2) panel is a rapid diagnostic tool that uses multiplex polymerase chain reaction technology to identify 43 different genetic targets. BCID2 detects 13 additional targets, including 7 resistance markers, not detected by the orig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Logan, Ashley, Beardsley, James, Taylor, Alex D, Williamson, John C, Palavecino, Elizabeth, Luther, Vera, Ohl, Christopher, Stone, Tyler
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752357/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.262
_version_ 1784850702183432192
author Logan, Ashley
Beardsley, James
Taylor, Alex D
Williamson, John C
Palavecino, Elizabeth
Luther, Vera
Ohl, Christopher
Stone, Tyler
author_facet Logan, Ashley
Beardsley, James
Taylor, Alex D
Williamson, John C
Palavecino, Elizabeth
Luther, Vera
Ohl, Christopher
Stone, Tyler
author_sort Logan, Ashley
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The BioFire® FilmArray® Blood Culture Identification 2 (BCID2) panel is a rapid diagnostic tool that uses multiplex polymerase chain reaction technology to identify 43 different genetic targets. BCID2 detects 13 additional targets, including 7 resistance markers, not detected by the original BCID panel. For this reason, our institution changed panels from BCID to BCID2 in August 2020. The purpose of this study was to assess the time to antibiotic change for Enterobacterales bloodstream infections before and after switch to BCID2. METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational, before-and-after study conducted at an 885-bed academic medical center. Adult patients with blood cultures positive for E. coli or K. pneumoniae (EC/KP) who received broad spectrum beta-lactam therapy were included. Patients with a polymicrobial or concurrent infection, hemodynamic instability, lack of source control by day 5, or death within 72 hours (hrs) of cultures being collected were excluded. The primary outcome was time to antibiotic change in the BCID group compared to the BCID2 group. Secondary outcomes included time to de-escalation or escalation and the number of opportunities for de-escalation or escalation. RESULTS: 88 patients were included, 55 in the BCID-group and 33 in the BCID2-group. Baseline characteristics are reported in Table 1. Median time to first antibiotic change was 65.3 hrs in the BCID-group vs 69.6 hrs in the BCID2-group (p=0.53). Times to first de-escalation and escalation and number of opportunities for de-escalation and escalation are presented in Table 2. Proportion of missed de-escalation opportunities based on panel results was greater in the BCID2 group (63.6% vs 0%, p< 0.05). [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: Opportunities to make timely antibiotic modifications with the use of the BCID2 panel exist for EC/KP blood stream infections. While no difference in time to first antibiotic change was present between groups, this highlights the importance of having an active stewardship team member available to respond to rapid diagnostic test results. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9752357
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97523572022-12-16 184. Impact of the BioFire® FilmArray® Blood Culture Identification 2 Panel on Antimicrobial Treatment of Enterobacterales Blood Stream Infections Logan, Ashley Beardsley, James Taylor, Alex D Williamson, John C Palavecino, Elizabeth Luther, Vera Ohl, Christopher Stone, Tyler Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: The BioFire® FilmArray® Blood Culture Identification 2 (BCID2) panel is a rapid diagnostic tool that uses multiplex polymerase chain reaction technology to identify 43 different genetic targets. BCID2 detects 13 additional targets, including 7 resistance markers, not detected by the original BCID panel. For this reason, our institution changed panels from BCID to BCID2 in August 2020. The purpose of this study was to assess the time to antibiotic change for Enterobacterales bloodstream infections before and after switch to BCID2. METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational, before-and-after study conducted at an 885-bed academic medical center. Adult patients with blood cultures positive for E. coli or K. pneumoniae (EC/KP) who received broad spectrum beta-lactam therapy were included. Patients with a polymicrobial or concurrent infection, hemodynamic instability, lack of source control by day 5, or death within 72 hours (hrs) of cultures being collected were excluded. The primary outcome was time to antibiotic change in the BCID group compared to the BCID2 group. Secondary outcomes included time to de-escalation or escalation and the number of opportunities for de-escalation or escalation. RESULTS: 88 patients were included, 55 in the BCID-group and 33 in the BCID2-group. Baseline characteristics are reported in Table 1. Median time to first antibiotic change was 65.3 hrs in the BCID-group vs 69.6 hrs in the BCID2-group (p=0.53). Times to first de-escalation and escalation and number of opportunities for de-escalation and escalation are presented in Table 2. Proportion of missed de-escalation opportunities based on panel results was greater in the BCID2 group (63.6% vs 0%, p< 0.05). [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: Opportunities to make timely antibiotic modifications with the use of the BCID2 panel exist for EC/KP blood stream infections. While no difference in time to first antibiotic change was present between groups, this highlights the importance of having an active stewardship team member available to respond to rapid diagnostic test results. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2022-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9752357/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.262 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Logan, Ashley
Beardsley, James
Taylor, Alex D
Williamson, John C
Palavecino, Elizabeth
Luther, Vera
Ohl, Christopher
Stone, Tyler
184. Impact of the BioFire® FilmArray® Blood Culture Identification 2 Panel on Antimicrobial Treatment of Enterobacterales Blood Stream Infections
title 184. Impact of the BioFire® FilmArray® Blood Culture Identification 2 Panel on Antimicrobial Treatment of Enterobacterales Blood Stream Infections
title_full 184. Impact of the BioFire® FilmArray® Blood Culture Identification 2 Panel on Antimicrobial Treatment of Enterobacterales Blood Stream Infections
title_fullStr 184. Impact of the BioFire® FilmArray® Blood Culture Identification 2 Panel on Antimicrobial Treatment of Enterobacterales Blood Stream Infections
title_full_unstemmed 184. Impact of the BioFire® FilmArray® Blood Culture Identification 2 Panel on Antimicrobial Treatment of Enterobacterales Blood Stream Infections
title_short 184. Impact of the BioFire® FilmArray® Blood Culture Identification 2 Panel on Antimicrobial Treatment of Enterobacterales Blood Stream Infections
title_sort 184. impact of the biofire® filmarray® blood culture identification 2 panel on antimicrobial treatment of enterobacterales blood stream infections
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752357/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.262
work_keys_str_mv AT loganashley 184impactofthebiofirefilmarraybloodcultureidentification2panelonantimicrobialtreatmentofenterobacteralesbloodstreaminfections
AT beardsleyjames 184impactofthebiofirefilmarraybloodcultureidentification2panelonantimicrobialtreatmentofenterobacteralesbloodstreaminfections
AT tayloralexd 184impactofthebiofirefilmarraybloodcultureidentification2panelonantimicrobialtreatmentofenterobacteralesbloodstreaminfections
AT williamsonjohnc 184impactofthebiofirefilmarraybloodcultureidentification2panelonantimicrobialtreatmentofenterobacteralesbloodstreaminfections
AT palavecinoelizabeth 184impactofthebiofirefilmarraybloodcultureidentification2panelonantimicrobialtreatmentofenterobacteralesbloodstreaminfections
AT luthervera 184impactofthebiofirefilmarraybloodcultureidentification2panelonantimicrobialtreatmentofenterobacteralesbloodstreaminfections
AT ohlchristopher 184impactofthebiofirefilmarraybloodcultureidentification2panelonantimicrobialtreatmentofenterobacteralesbloodstreaminfections
AT stonetyler 184impactofthebiofirefilmarraybloodcultureidentification2panelonantimicrobialtreatmentofenterobacteralesbloodstreaminfections