Cargando…
184. Impact of the BioFire® FilmArray® Blood Culture Identification 2 Panel on Antimicrobial Treatment of Enterobacterales Blood Stream Infections
BACKGROUND: The BioFire® FilmArray® Blood Culture Identification 2 (BCID2) panel is a rapid diagnostic tool that uses multiplex polymerase chain reaction technology to identify 43 different genetic targets. BCID2 detects 13 additional targets, including 7 resistance markers, not detected by the orig...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752357/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.262 |
_version_ | 1784850702183432192 |
---|---|
author | Logan, Ashley Beardsley, James Taylor, Alex D Williamson, John C Palavecino, Elizabeth Luther, Vera Ohl, Christopher Stone, Tyler |
author_facet | Logan, Ashley Beardsley, James Taylor, Alex D Williamson, John C Palavecino, Elizabeth Luther, Vera Ohl, Christopher Stone, Tyler |
author_sort | Logan, Ashley |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The BioFire® FilmArray® Blood Culture Identification 2 (BCID2) panel is a rapid diagnostic tool that uses multiplex polymerase chain reaction technology to identify 43 different genetic targets. BCID2 detects 13 additional targets, including 7 resistance markers, not detected by the original BCID panel. For this reason, our institution changed panels from BCID to BCID2 in August 2020. The purpose of this study was to assess the time to antibiotic change for Enterobacterales bloodstream infections before and after switch to BCID2. METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational, before-and-after study conducted at an 885-bed academic medical center. Adult patients with blood cultures positive for E. coli or K. pneumoniae (EC/KP) who received broad spectrum beta-lactam therapy were included. Patients with a polymicrobial or concurrent infection, hemodynamic instability, lack of source control by day 5, or death within 72 hours (hrs) of cultures being collected were excluded. The primary outcome was time to antibiotic change in the BCID group compared to the BCID2 group. Secondary outcomes included time to de-escalation or escalation and the number of opportunities for de-escalation or escalation. RESULTS: 88 patients were included, 55 in the BCID-group and 33 in the BCID2-group. Baseline characteristics are reported in Table 1. Median time to first antibiotic change was 65.3 hrs in the BCID-group vs 69.6 hrs in the BCID2-group (p=0.53). Times to first de-escalation and escalation and number of opportunities for de-escalation and escalation are presented in Table 2. Proportion of missed de-escalation opportunities based on panel results was greater in the BCID2 group (63.6% vs 0%, p< 0.05). [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: Opportunities to make timely antibiotic modifications with the use of the BCID2 panel exist for EC/KP blood stream infections. While no difference in time to first antibiotic change was present between groups, this highlights the importance of having an active stewardship team member available to respond to rapid diagnostic test results. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9752357 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97523572022-12-16 184. Impact of the BioFire® FilmArray® Blood Culture Identification 2 Panel on Antimicrobial Treatment of Enterobacterales Blood Stream Infections Logan, Ashley Beardsley, James Taylor, Alex D Williamson, John C Palavecino, Elizabeth Luther, Vera Ohl, Christopher Stone, Tyler Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: The BioFire® FilmArray® Blood Culture Identification 2 (BCID2) panel is a rapid diagnostic tool that uses multiplex polymerase chain reaction technology to identify 43 different genetic targets. BCID2 detects 13 additional targets, including 7 resistance markers, not detected by the original BCID panel. For this reason, our institution changed panels from BCID to BCID2 in August 2020. The purpose of this study was to assess the time to antibiotic change for Enterobacterales bloodstream infections before and after switch to BCID2. METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational, before-and-after study conducted at an 885-bed academic medical center. Adult patients with blood cultures positive for E. coli or K. pneumoniae (EC/KP) who received broad spectrum beta-lactam therapy were included. Patients with a polymicrobial or concurrent infection, hemodynamic instability, lack of source control by day 5, or death within 72 hours (hrs) of cultures being collected were excluded. The primary outcome was time to antibiotic change in the BCID group compared to the BCID2 group. Secondary outcomes included time to de-escalation or escalation and the number of opportunities for de-escalation or escalation. RESULTS: 88 patients were included, 55 in the BCID-group and 33 in the BCID2-group. Baseline characteristics are reported in Table 1. Median time to first antibiotic change was 65.3 hrs in the BCID-group vs 69.6 hrs in the BCID2-group (p=0.53). Times to first de-escalation and escalation and number of opportunities for de-escalation and escalation are presented in Table 2. Proportion of missed de-escalation opportunities based on panel results was greater in the BCID2 group (63.6% vs 0%, p< 0.05). [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: Opportunities to make timely antibiotic modifications with the use of the BCID2 panel exist for EC/KP blood stream infections. While no difference in time to first antibiotic change was present between groups, this highlights the importance of having an active stewardship team member available to respond to rapid diagnostic test results. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2022-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9752357/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.262 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Logan, Ashley Beardsley, James Taylor, Alex D Williamson, John C Palavecino, Elizabeth Luther, Vera Ohl, Christopher Stone, Tyler 184. Impact of the BioFire® FilmArray® Blood Culture Identification 2 Panel on Antimicrobial Treatment of Enterobacterales Blood Stream Infections |
title | 184. Impact of the BioFire® FilmArray® Blood Culture Identification 2 Panel on Antimicrobial Treatment of Enterobacterales Blood Stream Infections |
title_full | 184. Impact of the BioFire® FilmArray® Blood Culture Identification 2 Panel on Antimicrobial Treatment of Enterobacterales Blood Stream Infections |
title_fullStr | 184. Impact of the BioFire® FilmArray® Blood Culture Identification 2 Panel on Antimicrobial Treatment of Enterobacterales Blood Stream Infections |
title_full_unstemmed | 184. Impact of the BioFire® FilmArray® Blood Culture Identification 2 Panel on Antimicrobial Treatment of Enterobacterales Blood Stream Infections |
title_short | 184. Impact of the BioFire® FilmArray® Blood Culture Identification 2 Panel on Antimicrobial Treatment of Enterobacterales Blood Stream Infections |
title_sort | 184. impact of the biofire® filmarray® blood culture identification 2 panel on antimicrobial treatment of enterobacterales blood stream infections |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752357/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.262 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT loganashley 184impactofthebiofirefilmarraybloodcultureidentification2panelonantimicrobialtreatmentofenterobacteralesbloodstreaminfections AT beardsleyjames 184impactofthebiofirefilmarraybloodcultureidentification2panelonantimicrobialtreatmentofenterobacteralesbloodstreaminfections AT tayloralexd 184impactofthebiofirefilmarraybloodcultureidentification2panelonantimicrobialtreatmentofenterobacteralesbloodstreaminfections AT williamsonjohnc 184impactofthebiofirefilmarraybloodcultureidentification2panelonantimicrobialtreatmentofenterobacteralesbloodstreaminfections AT palavecinoelizabeth 184impactofthebiofirefilmarraybloodcultureidentification2panelonantimicrobialtreatmentofenterobacteralesbloodstreaminfections AT luthervera 184impactofthebiofirefilmarraybloodcultureidentification2panelonantimicrobialtreatmentofenterobacteralesbloodstreaminfections AT ohlchristopher 184impactofthebiofirefilmarraybloodcultureidentification2panelonantimicrobialtreatmentofenterobacteralesbloodstreaminfections AT stonetyler 184impactofthebiofirefilmarraybloodcultureidentification2panelonantimicrobialtreatmentofenterobacteralesbloodstreaminfections |