Cargando…

1064. Intra-Host SARS-CoV-2 Evolution Dynamics

BACKGROUND: Our understanding of SARS-CoV-2 evolution is limited. Most estimates arise from analysis of global databases populated with unrelated sequences and is currently estimated at ∼27.7 substitutions/genome/year. SARS-CoV-2 polymerase contains a proofreading function encoded by NSP-14 limiting...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haddad, Kim El, Esper, Frank, Mudiyanselage, Thamali Madhushani Adhikari, Li, Jing, Zheng, Tu, Cheng, Yu-Wei, Rhoads, Daniel D, Farkas, Daniel H, Ko, Jennifer, Worley, Sarah, Rubin, Brian, Zhang, Xiangyi, Leng, Xiaoyi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752359/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.905
_version_ 1784850702705623040
author Haddad, Kim El
Esper, Frank
Mudiyanselage, Thamali Madhushani Adhikari
Li, Jing
Zheng, Tu
Cheng, Yu-Wei
Rhoads, Daniel D
Farkas, Daniel H
Ko, Jennifer
Worley, Sarah
Rubin, Brian
Zhang, Xiangyi
Leng, Xiaoyi
author_facet Haddad, Kim El
Esper, Frank
Mudiyanselage, Thamali Madhushani Adhikari
Li, Jing
Zheng, Tu
Cheng, Yu-Wei
Rhoads, Daniel D
Farkas, Daniel H
Ko, Jennifer
Worley, Sarah
Rubin, Brian
Zhang, Xiangyi
Leng, Xiaoyi
author_sort Haddad, Kim El
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Our understanding of SARS-CoV-2 evolution is limited. Most estimates arise from analysis of global databases populated with unrelated sequences and is currently estimated at ∼27.7 substitutions/genome/year. SARS-CoV-2 polymerase contains a proofreading function encoded by NSP-14 limiting change. Additionally, virus evolution may be influenced by patient comorbidity. Intra-host mutational rate (MR) during infection remain poorly studied. METHODS: To minimize effect of vaccination and/or natural immunity on MR analysis, paired samples from adults originating from the initial pandemic wave (3/17/2020 through 5/27/2020) were retrieved and analyzed at Cleveland Clinic. Viral genome analysis was performed using next generation sequencing, and mutations between paired samples were quantified at allele frequencies (AF) ≥ 0.1, ≥ 0.5 and ≥ 0.75 and compared. MR was calculated employing F81 and JC69 evolution­­­­ models and compared between isolates with (Δ NSP-14) and without (wildtype, wt) non-synonymous mutations in NSP-14 and by comorbidity. RESULTS: A total of 40 patients (80 sample pairs) were identified. Median interval between paired tests was 15 days [range 5-32]. The estimated MR by F81 modeling was 317.2 (95%CI 312.0-322.3), 54.6 (95%CI 52.5-56.7) and 45.1 (95%CI 43.1-47.0) substitutions/genome/year at AF of ≥0.1, ≥0.5, ≥0.75 respectively. Rates in ΔNSP-14 (n=13) vs wt (n=27) groups were 557.7 (95%CI 537.0-578.2) vs 193.1 (95%CI 187.1-199.1) p-value 0.001, 50.8 (95%CI 44.3-57.3) vs 56.3 (95%CI 53.1-59.4) p-value 0.144, and 31.0 (95%CI 25.9-36.1) vs 51.3 (95%CI 48.3-54.3) p- value < 0.001 at AF ≥0.1, ≥0.5, ≥0.75 respectively. Patients with immune comorbidities (n=6) had significantly higher MR of 137.6 (95%CI 114.6-160.5) vs 40.5 (95%CI 38.4-42.7) p-value < 0.001, and 113.7 (95%CI 92.8-134.5) vs 33.4 (95%CI 31.5-35.4) p-value < 0.001 at AF ≥0.5 and ≥0.75 respectively. Similar results were obtained when using the JC69 model. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: Intra-host SARS-CoV-2 mutation rates are higher than those reported through population analysis. Virus strains with altered NSP-14 have accelerated MR at low AF. Immunosuppressed patients have elevated MR at higher AF. Understanding intra-host virus evolution will aid in current and future pandemic modeling. DISCLOSURES: Frank Esper, M.D, Johnson and Johnson: Advisor/Consultant Daniel D. Rhoads, M.D. PhD, Luminex: Advisor/Consultant|Talis Biomedical: Advisor/Consultant|Thermo Fisher: Advisor/Consultant.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9752359
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97523592022-12-16 1064. Intra-Host SARS-CoV-2 Evolution Dynamics Haddad, Kim El Esper, Frank Mudiyanselage, Thamali Madhushani Adhikari Li, Jing Zheng, Tu Cheng, Yu-Wei Rhoads, Daniel D Farkas, Daniel H Ko, Jennifer Worley, Sarah Rubin, Brian Zhang, Xiangyi Leng, Xiaoyi Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Our understanding of SARS-CoV-2 evolution is limited. Most estimates arise from analysis of global databases populated with unrelated sequences and is currently estimated at ∼27.7 substitutions/genome/year. SARS-CoV-2 polymerase contains a proofreading function encoded by NSP-14 limiting change. Additionally, virus evolution may be influenced by patient comorbidity. Intra-host mutational rate (MR) during infection remain poorly studied. METHODS: To minimize effect of vaccination and/or natural immunity on MR analysis, paired samples from adults originating from the initial pandemic wave (3/17/2020 through 5/27/2020) were retrieved and analyzed at Cleveland Clinic. Viral genome analysis was performed using next generation sequencing, and mutations between paired samples were quantified at allele frequencies (AF) ≥ 0.1, ≥ 0.5 and ≥ 0.75 and compared. MR was calculated employing F81 and JC69 evolution­­­­ models and compared between isolates with (Δ NSP-14) and without (wildtype, wt) non-synonymous mutations in NSP-14 and by comorbidity. RESULTS: A total of 40 patients (80 sample pairs) were identified. Median interval between paired tests was 15 days [range 5-32]. The estimated MR by F81 modeling was 317.2 (95%CI 312.0-322.3), 54.6 (95%CI 52.5-56.7) and 45.1 (95%CI 43.1-47.0) substitutions/genome/year at AF of ≥0.1, ≥0.5, ≥0.75 respectively. Rates in ΔNSP-14 (n=13) vs wt (n=27) groups were 557.7 (95%CI 537.0-578.2) vs 193.1 (95%CI 187.1-199.1) p-value 0.001, 50.8 (95%CI 44.3-57.3) vs 56.3 (95%CI 53.1-59.4) p-value 0.144, and 31.0 (95%CI 25.9-36.1) vs 51.3 (95%CI 48.3-54.3) p- value < 0.001 at AF ≥0.1, ≥0.5, ≥0.75 respectively. Patients with immune comorbidities (n=6) had significantly higher MR of 137.6 (95%CI 114.6-160.5) vs 40.5 (95%CI 38.4-42.7) p-value < 0.001, and 113.7 (95%CI 92.8-134.5) vs 33.4 (95%CI 31.5-35.4) p-value < 0.001 at AF ≥0.5 and ≥0.75 respectively. Similar results were obtained when using the JC69 model. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: Intra-host SARS-CoV-2 mutation rates are higher than those reported through population analysis. Virus strains with altered NSP-14 have accelerated MR at low AF. Immunosuppressed patients have elevated MR at higher AF. Understanding intra-host virus evolution will aid in current and future pandemic modeling. DISCLOSURES: Frank Esper, M.D, Johnson and Johnson: Advisor/Consultant Daniel D. Rhoads, M.D. PhD, Luminex: Advisor/Consultant|Talis Biomedical: Advisor/Consultant|Thermo Fisher: Advisor/Consultant. Oxford University Press 2022-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9752359/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.905 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Haddad, Kim El
Esper, Frank
Mudiyanselage, Thamali Madhushani Adhikari
Li, Jing
Zheng, Tu
Cheng, Yu-Wei
Rhoads, Daniel D
Farkas, Daniel H
Ko, Jennifer
Worley, Sarah
Rubin, Brian
Zhang, Xiangyi
Leng, Xiaoyi
1064. Intra-Host SARS-CoV-2 Evolution Dynamics
title 1064. Intra-Host SARS-CoV-2 Evolution Dynamics
title_full 1064. Intra-Host SARS-CoV-2 Evolution Dynamics
title_fullStr 1064. Intra-Host SARS-CoV-2 Evolution Dynamics
title_full_unstemmed 1064. Intra-Host SARS-CoV-2 Evolution Dynamics
title_short 1064. Intra-Host SARS-CoV-2 Evolution Dynamics
title_sort 1064. intra-host sars-cov-2 evolution dynamics
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752359/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.905
work_keys_str_mv AT haddadkimel 1064intrahostsarscov2evolutiondynamics
AT esperfrank 1064intrahostsarscov2evolutiondynamics
AT mudiyanselagethamalimadhushaniadhikari 1064intrahostsarscov2evolutiondynamics
AT lijing 1064intrahostsarscov2evolutiondynamics
AT zhengtu 1064intrahostsarscov2evolutiondynamics
AT chengyuwei 1064intrahostsarscov2evolutiondynamics
AT rhoadsdanield 1064intrahostsarscov2evolutiondynamics
AT farkasdanielh 1064intrahostsarscov2evolutiondynamics
AT kojennifer 1064intrahostsarscov2evolutiondynamics
AT worleysarah 1064intrahostsarscov2evolutiondynamics
AT rubinbrian 1064intrahostsarscov2evolutiondynamics
AT zhangxiangyi 1064intrahostsarscov2evolutiondynamics
AT lengxiaoyi 1064intrahostsarscov2evolutiondynamics