Cargando…

297. Secondary Bacterial Blood Stream Infections in Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19

BACKGROUND: Nosocomial Bloodstream infection (nBSI) in COVID 19 patients is an emerging clinical concern for physicians. In this study, we aimed to assess the prevalence of BSI in COVID-19 patients admitted to our hospital, The Indus Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan. METHODS: This retrospective study inc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adnan, Fareeha, Khan, Mariam A, Umer, Amna, Khursheed, Nazia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752372/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.375
_version_ 1784850705967742976
author Adnan, Fareeha
Khan, Mariam A
Umer, Amna
Khursheed, Nazia
author_facet Adnan, Fareeha
Khan, Mariam A
Umer, Amna
Khursheed, Nazia
author_sort Adnan, Fareeha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Nosocomial Bloodstream infection (nBSI) in COVID 19 patients is an emerging clinical concern for physicians. In this study, we aimed to assess the prevalence of BSI in COVID-19 patients admitted to our hospital, The Indus Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan. METHODS: This retrospective study included the RT-PCR confirmed COVID-19 patients admitted to our hospital from March 2020 to December 2021. Demographics, the incidence of BSI, frequency of pathogens from the positive blood cultures, antibiotics resistance pattern, and frequency of Multidrug-Resistant Organisms (MDROs) were obtained from the hospital’s electronic medical record. Blood cultures were performed using BD BACTEC. Bacterial identification was done by using Analytical Profile Index(API) whereas antimicrobial susceptibility testing of isolates was performed by the Kirby-Baur disk diffusion method and VITEK® 2 COMPACT. RESULTS: Our data showed that 25% of the patients admitted to our hospital developed BSI. The incidence of BSI was higher in males than in females (62.6% vs 37.4%) and most of the patients were in the age group of 46-60 years (n=93). Gram-negative pathogens were pre-dominantly identified, (50.67%), followed by yeast (12.9%), and Gram-positive pathogens (11.8%). Among these isolates, Acinetobacter sp. was the most commonly identified pathogen. Figure 1 shows the incidence of BSI and Figure 2 shows the distribution of all the pathogens identified from the positive blood cultures. Antibiotics resistance pattern showed a higher prevalence of MDROs. Among the MDROs, Acinetobacter sp. was highest in number (97.6%), followed by 66.6% of Pseudomonas, 63% of E.coli, 62% of S. aureus, 61.5% of Enterococcus, and 50% of Klebsiella sp. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: Our findings indicated the incidence of BSI in 25% of COVID-19 in-patients. There is a significant prevalence of MDROs among which compelling prevalence of Acinetobacter sp. was observed. The COVID-19 pandemic overburdened the already vulnerable health care systems and made it difficult to adhere to infection control practices leading to the emergence of MDROs. Moreover, timely initiation of empirical antibiotics could also reduce the incidence of BSI in patients. Lastly, further multi-centered studies are needed for the evaluation of the incidence of BSI in our region. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9752372
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97523722022-12-16 297. Secondary Bacterial Blood Stream Infections in Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19 Adnan, Fareeha Khan, Mariam A Umer, Amna Khursheed, Nazia Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Nosocomial Bloodstream infection (nBSI) in COVID 19 patients is an emerging clinical concern for physicians. In this study, we aimed to assess the prevalence of BSI in COVID-19 patients admitted to our hospital, The Indus Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan. METHODS: This retrospective study included the RT-PCR confirmed COVID-19 patients admitted to our hospital from March 2020 to December 2021. Demographics, the incidence of BSI, frequency of pathogens from the positive blood cultures, antibiotics resistance pattern, and frequency of Multidrug-Resistant Organisms (MDROs) were obtained from the hospital’s electronic medical record. Blood cultures were performed using BD BACTEC. Bacterial identification was done by using Analytical Profile Index(API) whereas antimicrobial susceptibility testing of isolates was performed by the Kirby-Baur disk diffusion method and VITEK® 2 COMPACT. RESULTS: Our data showed that 25% of the patients admitted to our hospital developed BSI. The incidence of BSI was higher in males than in females (62.6% vs 37.4%) and most of the patients were in the age group of 46-60 years (n=93). Gram-negative pathogens were pre-dominantly identified, (50.67%), followed by yeast (12.9%), and Gram-positive pathogens (11.8%). Among these isolates, Acinetobacter sp. was the most commonly identified pathogen. Figure 1 shows the incidence of BSI and Figure 2 shows the distribution of all the pathogens identified from the positive blood cultures. Antibiotics resistance pattern showed a higher prevalence of MDROs. Among the MDROs, Acinetobacter sp. was highest in number (97.6%), followed by 66.6% of Pseudomonas, 63% of E.coli, 62% of S. aureus, 61.5% of Enterococcus, and 50% of Klebsiella sp. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: Our findings indicated the incidence of BSI in 25% of COVID-19 in-patients. There is a significant prevalence of MDROs among which compelling prevalence of Acinetobacter sp. was observed. The COVID-19 pandemic overburdened the already vulnerable health care systems and made it difficult to adhere to infection control practices leading to the emergence of MDROs. Moreover, timely initiation of empirical antibiotics could also reduce the incidence of BSI in patients. Lastly, further multi-centered studies are needed for the evaluation of the incidence of BSI in our region. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2022-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9752372/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.375 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Adnan, Fareeha
Khan, Mariam A
Umer, Amna
Khursheed, Nazia
297. Secondary Bacterial Blood Stream Infections in Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19
title 297. Secondary Bacterial Blood Stream Infections in Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19
title_full 297. Secondary Bacterial Blood Stream Infections in Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19
title_fullStr 297. Secondary Bacterial Blood Stream Infections in Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19
title_full_unstemmed 297. Secondary Bacterial Blood Stream Infections in Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19
title_short 297. Secondary Bacterial Blood Stream Infections in Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19
title_sort 297. secondary bacterial blood stream infections in patients hospitalized with covid-19
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752372/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.375
work_keys_str_mv AT adnanfareeha 297secondarybacterialbloodstreaminfectionsinpatientshospitalizedwithcovid19
AT khanmariama 297secondarybacterialbloodstreaminfectionsinpatientshospitalizedwithcovid19
AT umeramna 297secondarybacterialbloodstreaminfectionsinpatientshospitalizedwithcovid19
AT khursheednazia 297secondarybacterialbloodstreaminfectionsinpatientshospitalizedwithcovid19