Cargando…
2297. COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness Among Pregnant People
BACKGROUND: COVID-19 presents a serious health risk to pregnant people and pregnancy outcomes. However, pregnant people were not included in pivotal phase III COVID-19 vaccine efficacy trials. METHODS: We used Cox regression models in a cohort study to determine hazard ratios (HR) of a PCR positive...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752373/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.135 |
_version_ | 1784850706206818304 |
---|---|
author | Zerbo, Ousseny Thomas Ray, G Goddard, Kristin Layefsky, Evan Fireman, Bruce Klein, Nicola P |
author_facet | Zerbo, Ousseny Thomas Ray, G Goddard, Kristin Layefsky, Evan Fireman, Bruce Klein, Nicola P |
author_sort | Zerbo, Ousseny |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: COVID-19 presents a serious health risk to pregnant people and pregnancy outcomes. However, pregnant people were not included in pivotal phase III COVID-19 vaccine efficacy trials. METHODS: We used Cox regression models in a cohort study to determine hazard ratios (HR) of a PCR positive test (“infection”) comparing vaccinated with unvaccinated pregnant persons in Kaiser Permanente Northern California. HRs were adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, type of insurance coverage, geographical area, BMI, preexisting diabetes, hypertension, parity, time since pregnancy onset and smoking status. Vaccine effectiveness (VE), calculated as 1 minus adjusted HR, was estimated for fully vaccinated < 150 and ≥ 150 days prior to infection. VE was estimated for before and during Delta, and Omicron. We also calculated incidence rates of COVID-pneumonia associated hospitalization by vaccination status. RESULTS: Among 68836 pregnancies between 12/15/2020 and 3/31/2022, 21834 (31.7%) were fully vaccinated and 5980 (8.7%) were boosted by the end of pregnancy. Compared with unvaccinated persons, the HRs of infection for fully vaccinated < 150 days prior were 0.13 (95% CI: 0.07 – 0.23; VE=87% [77% - 93%]) before Delta; 0.25 (CI: 0.20 – 0.30; VE=75% [70% - 80%]) during Delta and 0.76 (CI: 0.61 – 0.94; VE= 24% [16% - 39%]) during Omicron. The HRs for ≥ 150 days prior were 0.38 (CI: 0.31 – 0.46; VE=62 % [54% - 69%]) during Delta and 1.04 (CI: 0.89 – 1.22; VE= -0.04% [-0.22% – 0.11%]) during Omicron. The HRs for boosted persons were 0.10 (CI: 0.04 – 0.25; VE= 90% [75% - 96%]) during Delta and 0.42 (CI: 0.34 – 0.52; VE=58% [48% - 66%]) during Omicron periods. Incidence rates (IR) per 1000 person-years for hospitalization before delta were 0.75 among unvaccinated and zero among vaccinated. During Delta, the IR was 6.64 for unvaccinated and zero for fully vaccinated and boosted. During Omicron, the IR was 10.27 for unvaccinated, zero for fully vaccinated < 150 days prior, 2.48 for fully vaccinated ≥ 150 days prior and zero for those boosted. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 vaccines protect against infection and hospitalization among pregnant people. However, vaccine effectiveness against infection wanes over time and was lower during Omicron. Booster doses are necessary for continuous protection. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9752373 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97523732022-12-16 2297. COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness Among Pregnant People Zerbo, Ousseny Thomas Ray, G Goddard, Kristin Layefsky, Evan Fireman, Bruce Klein, Nicola P Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: COVID-19 presents a serious health risk to pregnant people and pregnancy outcomes. However, pregnant people were not included in pivotal phase III COVID-19 vaccine efficacy trials. METHODS: We used Cox regression models in a cohort study to determine hazard ratios (HR) of a PCR positive test (“infection”) comparing vaccinated with unvaccinated pregnant persons in Kaiser Permanente Northern California. HRs were adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, type of insurance coverage, geographical area, BMI, preexisting diabetes, hypertension, parity, time since pregnancy onset and smoking status. Vaccine effectiveness (VE), calculated as 1 minus adjusted HR, was estimated for fully vaccinated < 150 and ≥ 150 days prior to infection. VE was estimated for before and during Delta, and Omicron. We also calculated incidence rates of COVID-pneumonia associated hospitalization by vaccination status. RESULTS: Among 68836 pregnancies between 12/15/2020 and 3/31/2022, 21834 (31.7%) were fully vaccinated and 5980 (8.7%) were boosted by the end of pregnancy. Compared with unvaccinated persons, the HRs of infection for fully vaccinated < 150 days prior were 0.13 (95% CI: 0.07 – 0.23; VE=87% [77% - 93%]) before Delta; 0.25 (CI: 0.20 – 0.30; VE=75% [70% - 80%]) during Delta and 0.76 (CI: 0.61 – 0.94; VE= 24% [16% - 39%]) during Omicron. The HRs for ≥ 150 days prior were 0.38 (CI: 0.31 – 0.46; VE=62 % [54% - 69%]) during Delta and 1.04 (CI: 0.89 – 1.22; VE= -0.04% [-0.22% – 0.11%]) during Omicron. The HRs for boosted persons were 0.10 (CI: 0.04 – 0.25; VE= 90% [75% - 96%]) during Delta and 0.42 (CI: 0.34 – 0.52; VE=58% [48% - 66%]) during Omicron periods. Incidence rates (IR) per 1000 person-years for hospitalization before delta were 0.75 among unvaccinated and zero among vaccinated. During Delta, the IR was 6.64 for unvaccinated and zero for fully vaccinated and boosted. During Omicron, the IR was 10.27 for unvaccinated, zero for fully vaccinated < 150 days prior, 2.48 for fully vaccinated ≥ 150 days prior and zero for those boosted. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 vaccines protect against infection and hospitalization among pregnant people. However, vaccine effectiveness against infection wanes over time and was lower during Omicron. Booster doses are necessary for continuous protection. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2022-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9752373/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.135 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Zerbo, Ousseny Thomas Ray, G Goddard, Kristin Layefsky, Evan Fireman, Bruce Klein, Nicola P 2297. COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness Among Pregnant People |
title | 2297. COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness Among Pregnant People |
title_full | 2297. COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness Among Pregnant People |
title_fullStr | 2297. COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness Among Pregnant People |
title_full_unstemmed | 2297. COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness Among Pregnant People |
title_short | 2297. COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness Among Pregnant People |
title_sort | 2297. covid-19 vaccine effectiveness among pregnant people |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752373/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.135 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zerboousseny 2297covid19vaccineeffectivenessamongpregnantpeople AT thomasrayg 2297covid19vaccineeffectivenessamongpregnantpeople AT goddardkristin 2297covid19vaccineeffectivenessamongpregnantpeople AT layefskyevan 2297covid19vaccineeffectivenessamongpregnantpeople AT firemanbruce 2297covid19vaccineeffectivenessamongpregnantpeople AT kleinnicolap 2297covid19vaccineeffectivenessamongpregnantpeople |