Cargando…

1304. Mission-based Academic Tweeting: Analysis of Content Engagement over One Year

BACKGROUND: The Baylor College of Medicine Infectious Diseases Fellowship program (BCM ID) launched a new academic Twitter account during the COVID-19 pandemic with the mission to promote the achievements of fellows and faculty (promotion-based tweets, or PBT) and disseminate original educational ma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Teena, Guajardo, Emmanuel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752399/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.1135
_version_ 1784850712909316096
author Xu, Teena
Guajardo, Emmanuel
author_facet Xu, Teena
Guajardo, Emmanuel
author_sort Xu, Teena
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Baylor College of Medicine Infectious Diseases Fellowship program (BCM ID) launched a new academic Twitter account during the COVID-19 pandemic with the mission to promote the achievements of fellows and faculty (promotion-based tweets, or PBT) and disseminate original educational material (education-based tweets, or EBT) during a fellowship recruitment season that became virtual due to the pandemic. Account content was developed by both ID fellows and faculty, with the goal of increasing social media engagement with the fellowship program. Currently, the average Twitter engagement rate per tweet is 0.037% across all industries and 0.7% for higher education accounts. We looked at the engagement rate of mission-based tweets during the inaugural year of the BCM ID Fellowship twitter account. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of tweets published on the BCM ID Fellowship account during the first year of operations (8/1/20-7/31/21). We reviewed 64 mission-based tweets for impressions (number of times a tweet is shown to users), engagement (number of times users interacted with a tweet), and reach (number of followers). We calculated engagement rate (engagement-to-impression ratio, or E:I) for each tweet and compared the engagement rates between EBT and PBT. We also examined the trend of followers over time. Data were collected in October 2021. RESULTS: EBT comprised 41% of total tweets, and PBT comprised the remaining 59%. EBT averaged 3,662 impressions and 458 engagements, for an E:I of 9.6%. PBT averaged 2,449 impressions and 130 engagements, for an E:I of 5.3% (p = 0.007). Despite a decrease in total posts per month over this time period, follower count continued to increase, and monthly engagement rate per tweet remained above 1%. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: Our experience suggests that user engagement is higher for EBT. Programs planning to launch a new academic Twitter account should consider focusing initial content on education to maximize overall engagement and reach. One limitation of this study is that frequency of tweets also impacts engagement, which may confound data from later in the inaugural year, when tweeting from the account became less frequent. [Figure: see text] DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9752399
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97523992022-12-16 1304. Mission-based Academic Tweeting: Analysis of Content Engagement over One Year Xu, Teena Guajardo, Emmanuel Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: The Baylor College of Medicine Infectious Diseases Fellowship program (BCM ID) launched a new academic Twitter account during the COVID-19 pandemic with the mission to promote the achievements of fellows and faculty (promotion-based tweets, or PBT) and disseminate original educational material (education-based tweets, or EBT) during a fellowship recruitment season that became virtual due to the pandemic. Account content was developed by both ID fellows and faculty, with the goal of increasing social media engagement with the fellowship program. Currently, the average Twitter engagement rate per tweet is 0.037% across all industries and 0.7% for higher education accounts. We looked at the engagement rate of mission-based tweets during the inaugural year of the BCM ID Fellowship twitter account. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of tweets published on the BCM ID Fellowship account during the first year of operations (8/1/20-7/31/21). We reviewed 64 mission-based tweets for impressions (number of times a tweet is shown to users), engagement (number of times users interacted with a tweet), and reach (number of followers). We calculated engagement rate (engagement-to-impression ratio, or E:I) for each tweet and compared the engagement rates between EBT and PBT. We also examined the trend of followers over time. Data were collected in October 2021. RESULTS: EBT comprised 41% of total tweets, and PBT comprised the remaining 59%. EBT averaged 3,662 impressions and 458 engagements, for an E:I of 9.6%. PBT averaged 2,449 impressions and 130 engagements, for an E:I of 5.3% (p = 0.007). Despite a decrease in total posts per month over this time period, follower count continued to increase, and monthly engagement rate per tweet remained above 1%. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: Our experience suggests that user engagement is higher for EBT. Programs planning to launch a new academic Twitter account should consider focusing initial content on education to maximize overall engagement and reach. One limitation of this study is that frequency of tweets also impacts engagement, which may confound data from later in the inaugural year, when tweeting from the account became less frequent. [Figure: see text] DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2022-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9752399/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.1135 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Xu, Teena
Guajardo, Emmanuel
1304. Mission-based Academic Tweeting: Analysis of Content Engagement over One Year
title 1304. Mission-based Academic Tweeting: Analysis of Content Engagement over One Year
title_full 1304. Mission-based Academic Tweeting: Analysis of Content Engagement over One Year
title_fullStr 1304. Mission-based Academic Tweeting: Analysis of Content Engagement over One Year
title_full_unstemmed 1304. Mission-based Academic Tweeting: Analysis of Content Engagement over One Year
title_short 1304. Mission-based Academic Tweeting: Analysis of Content Engagement over One Year
title_sort 1304. mission-based academic tweeting: analysis of content engagement over one year
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752399/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.1135
work_keys_str_mv AT xuteena 1304missionbasedacademictweetinganalysisofcontentengagementoveroneyear
AT guajardoemmanuel 1304missionbasedacademictweetinganalysisofcontentengagementoveroneyear