Cargando…
1697. Dose-response Studies of the Novel Bacterial Leucyl-tRNA Synthetase Inhibitor, Epetraborole, in the Intracellular Hollow Fiber System Model of Mycobacterium avium complex Lung Disease
BACKGROUND: Based on meta-analyses the current standard-of-care regimen (SOC) for Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) lung disease achieves a sustained sputum conversion rate of ∼54% at best. Epetraborole (EBO) is a boron-containing oral inhibitor of bacterial leucyl-tRNA synthetase, an essential enzy...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752474/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.1327 |
_version_ | 1784850732434849792 |
---|---|
author | Chapagain, Moti Athale, Shruti Pasipanodya, Jotam Howe, David Alley, M R K Gumbo, Tawanda |
author_facet | Chapagain, Moti Athale, Shruti Pasipanodya, Jotam Howe, David Alley, M R K Gumbo, Tawanda |
author_sort | Chapagain, Moti |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Based on meta-analyses the current standard-of-care regimen (SOC) for Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) lung disease achieves a sustained sputum conversion rate of ∼54% at best. Epetraborole (EBO) is a boron-containing oral inhibitor of bacterial leucyl-tRNA synthetase, an essential enzyme in protein synthesis; EBO demonstrates potent activity against nontuberculous mycobacteria. To identify EBO exposure-effect parameters we used the intracellular hollow fiber system model of intracellular pulmonary MAC (HFS-MAC). METHODS: EBO was administered once daily at 8 different doses to HFS-MAC replicates for 28 days to achieve a half-life (t½) of 10.4h and the 0-24h area under the concentration-time curves (AUC(0-24)) that cover the observed AUC values in humans. The SOC combination of clarithromycin (CLR), ethambutol (EMB), and rifabutin (RFB) at human intrapulmonary pharmacokinetic (PK) concentrations was used. The central compartment of each HFS-MAC unit was sampled throughout the 28 days to assess PK parameters as was the peripheral compartment for total bacterial burden and the EBO-resistant bacterial burden. EBO AUC versus total MAC burden was modeled using the inhibitory sigmoid maximal effect (E(max)) model. EBO AUC versus EBO-resistant MAC burden was modeled using a quadratic function. RESULTS: Measured EBO concentrations demonstrated a t(1/2) of 10h. For SOC, the AUC for CLR, EMB, and RFB was 60 mg*h/L (t(1/2)=6h), 39 mg*h/L (t(1/2)=8h), and 1.5 mg*h/L (t(1/2)=45h), respectively, similar to human lung concentrations. Changes in MAC burden over 28 days (Fig. 1) show that highest EBO exposures matched SOC until day 14. The exposure versus effect on each sampling day is shown in Fig. 2. The EBO AUC mediating 50% of E(max) (EC(50)) was an AUC of 22 mg*h/L (95% confidence interval [CI]: 16-70), and the EC(80) was an AUC of 47.5 mg*h/L (CI: 34.6-151.2). The relationship between AUC and EBO-resistant subpopulation (Fig. 3) shows that an AUC(0-24) of 47.5 mg*h/L, the same as the EC(80) for microbial kill, was associated with resistance suppression, as was the addition of SOC to EBO. [Figure: see text] Bacterial burden on serial samples from all HFS-MAC units and replicates over 28days are shown. The highest epetraborole exposures demonstrated the same effectiveness as the three drug SOC until day 14, after which it failed as resistance emerged. On the other hand adding epetraborole at an AUC of 43.6 mg*h/L to the SOC led to much faster kill (i.e, higher kill slopes) than SOC or the epetraborole monotherapy at the same AUC. [Figure: see text] Shown are inhibitory sigmoid Emax curves for epetraborole AUC versus log10 CFU/mL on each sampling day, as well as various extents of microbial kill such as stasis (holding burden similar to day 0), 1 log CFU/mL kill and 2 log CFU/mL kill. Beyond day 3, epetraborole killed > 1log CFU/mL, which means it was rapidly bactericidal. [Figure: see text] Drug-resistant burden is shown as log10 CFU/mL. The addition of SOC to EBO totally suppressed emergence of any resistance on all days. CONCLUSION: EBO monotherapy with an AUC(0-24) > 16.9 mg*h/L killed > 1.0 log(10) CFU/mL of MAC compared to day 0. At the EC(80), EBO killed at least 2.0 log(10) CFU/mL, thus was highly bactericidal. EBO plus SOC demonstrated resistance suppression. DISCLOSURES: Moti Chapagain, MD, PhD, Praedicare Inc.: Stocks/Bonds Shruti Athale, PhD, Praedicare Inc.: Stocks/Bonds Jotam Pasipanodya, MD, PhD, Praedicare Inc.: Employee MRK Alley, PhD, ABBOTT LABS: Stocks/Bonds|ABBVIE: Stocks/Bonds|AN2 Therapeutics: Author on epetraborole patent|AN2 Therapeutics: Salary|AN2 Therapeutics: Ownership Interest|AVANOS MED INC: Stocks/Bonds|NABRIVA THERAPEUTICS PLC: Stocks/Bonds|NOVARTIS AG: Stocks/Bonds Tawanda Gumbo, MD, Hydronium Biopharma: Ownership Interest|Hydronium Biopharma: Stocks/Bonds|Praedicare Africa Pvt Ltd: Board Member|Praedicare Africa Pvt Ltd: Ownership Interest|Praedicare Africa Pvt Ltd: Stocks/Bonds|Praedicare Inc.: Patents|Praedicare Inc.: Ownership Interest|Praedicare Inc.: Stocks/Bonds. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9752474 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97524742022-12-16 1697. Dose-response Studies of the Novel Bacterial Leucyl-tRNA Synthetase Inhibitor, Epetraborole, in the Intracellular Hollow Fiber System Model of Mycobacterium avium complex Lung Disease Chapagain, Moti Athale, Shruti Pasipanodya, Jotam Howe, David Alley, M R K Gumbo, Tawanda Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Based on meta-analyses the current standard-of-care regimen (SOC) for Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) lung disease achieves a sustained sputum conversion rate of ∼54% at best. Epetraborole (EBO) is a boron-containing oral inhibitor of bacterial leucyl-tRNA synthetase, an essential enzyme in protein synthesis; EBO demonstrates potent activity against nontuberculous mycobacteria. To identify EBO exposure-effect parameters we used the intracellular hollow fiber system model of intracellular pulmonary MAC (HFS-MAC). METHODS: EBO was administered once daily at 8 different doses to HFS-MAC replicates for 28 days to achieve a half-life (t½) of 10.4h and the 0-24h area under the concentration-time curves (AUC(0-24)) that cover the observed AUC values in humans. The SOC combination of clarithromycin (CLR), ethambutol (EMB), and rifabutin (RFB) at human intrapulmonary pharmacokinetic (PK) concentrations was used. The central compartment of each HFS-MAC unit was sampled throughout the 28 days to assess PK parameters as was the peripheral compartment for total bacterial burden and the EBO-resistant bacterial burden. EBO AUC versus total MAC burden was modeled using the inhibitory sigmoid maximal effect (E(max)) model. EBO AUC versus EBO-resistant MAC burden was modeled using a quadratic function. RESULTS: Measured EBO concentrations demonstrated a t(1/2) of 10h. For SOC, the AUC for CLR, EMB, and RFB was 60 mg*h/L (t(1/2)=6h), 39 mg*h/L (t(1/2)=8h), and 1.5 mg*h/L (t(1/2)=45h), respectively, similar to human lung concentrations. Changes in MAC burden over 28 days (Fig. 1) show that highest EBO exposures matched SOC until day 14. The exposure versus effect on each sampling day is shown in Fig. 2. The EBO AUC mediating 50% of E(max) (EC(50)) was an AUC of 22 mg*h/L (95% confidence interval [CI]: 16-70), and the EC(80) was an AUC of 47.5 mg*h/L (CI: 34.6-151.2). The relationship between AUC and EBO-resistant subpopulation (Fig. 3) shows that an AUC(0-24) of 47.5 mg*h/L, the same as the EC(80) for microbial kill, was associated with resistance suppression, as was the addition of SOC to EBO. [Figure: see text] Bacterial burden on serial samples from all HFS-MAC units and replicates over 28days are shown. The highest epetraborole exposures demonstrated the same effectiveness as the three drug SOC until day 14, after which it failed as resistance emerged. On the other hand adding epetraborole at an AUC of 43.6 mg*h/L to the SOC led to much faster kill (i.e, higher kill slopes) than SOC or the epetraborole monotherapy at the same AUC. [Figure: see text] Shown are inhibitory sigmoid Emax curves for epetraborole AUC versus log10 CFU/mL on each sampling day, as well as various extents of microbial kill such as stasis (holding burden similar to day 0), 1 log CFU/mL kill and 2 log CFU/mL kill. Beyond day 3, epetraborole killed > 1log CFU/mL, which means it was rapidly bactericidal. [Figure: see text] Drug-resistant burden is shown as log10 CFU/mL. The addition of SOC to EBO totally suppressed emergence of any resistance on all days. CONCLUSION: EBO monotherapy with an AUC(0-24) > 16.9 mg*h/L killed > 1.0 log(10) CFU/mL of MAC compared to day 0. At the EC(80), EBO killed at least 2.0 log(10) CFU/mL, thus was highly bactericidal. EBO plus SOC demonstrated resistance suppression. DISCLOSURES: Moti Chapagain, MD, PhD, Praedicare Inc.: Stocks/Bonds Shruti Athale, PhD, Praedicare Inc.: Stocks/Bonds Jotam Pasipanodya, MD, PhD, Praedicare Inc.: Employee MRK Alley, PhD, ABBOTT LABS: Stocks/Bonds|ABBVIE: Stocks/Bonds|AN2 Therapeutics: Author on epetraborole patent|AN2 Therapeutics: Salary|AN2 Therapeutics: Ownership Interest|AVANOS MED INC: Stocks/Bonds|NABRIVA THERAPEUTICS PLC: Stocks/Bonds|NOVARTIS AG: Stocks/Bonds Tawanda Gumbo, MD, Hydronium Biopharma: Ownership Interest|Hydronium Biopharma: Stocks/Bonds|Praedicare Africa Pvt Ltd: Board Member|Praedicare Africa Pvt Ltd: Ownership Interest|Praedicare Africa Pvt Ltd: Stocks/Bonds|Praedicare Inc.: Patents|Praedicare Inc.: Ownership Interest|Praedicare Inc.: Stocks/Bonds. Oxford University Press 2022-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9752474/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.1327 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Chapagain, Moti Athale, Shruti Pasipanodya, Jotam Howe, David Alley, M R K Gumbo, Tawanda 1697. Dose-response Studies of the Novel Bacterial Leucyl-tRNA Synthetase Inhibitor, Epetraborole, in the Intracellular Hollow Fiber System Model of Mycobacterium avium complex Lung Disease |
title | 1697. Dose-response Studies of the Novel Bacterial Leucyl-tRNA Synthetase Inhibitor, Epetraborole, in the Intracellular Hollow Fiber System Model of Mycobacterium avium complex Lung Disease |
title_full | 1697. Dose-response Studies of the Novel Bacterial Leucyl-tRNA Synthetase Inhibitor, Epetraborole, in the Intracellular Hollow Fiber System Model of Mycobacterium avium complex Lung Disease |
title_fullStr | 1697. Dose-response Studies of the Novel Bacterial Leucyl-tRNA Synthetase Inhibitor, Epetraborole, in the Intracellular Hollow Fiber System Model of Mycobacterium avium complex Lung Disease |
title_full_unstemmed | 1697. Dose-response Studies of the Novel Bacterial Leucyl-tRNA Synthetase Inhibitor, Epetraborole, in the Intracellular Hollow Fiber System Model of Mycobacterium avium complex Lung Disease |
title_short | 1697. Dose-response Studies of the Novel Bacterial Leucyl-tRNA Synthetase Inhibitor, Epetraborole, in the Intracellular Hollow Fiber System Model of Mycobacterium avium complex Lung Disease |
title_sort | 1697. dose-response studies of the novel bacterial leucyl-trna synthetase inhibitor, epetraborole, in the intracellular hollow fiber system model of mycobacterium avium complex lung disease |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752474/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.1327 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chapagainmoti 1697doseresponsestudiesofthenovelbacterialleucyltrnasynthetaseinhibitorepetraboroleintheintracellularhollowfibersystemmodelofmycobacteriumaviumcomplexlungdisease AT athaleshruti 1697doseresponsestudiesofthenovelbacterialleucyltrnasynthetaseinhibitorepetraboroleintheintracellularhollowfibersystemmodelofmycobacteriumaviumcomplexlungdisease AT pasipanodyajotam 1697doseresponsestudiesofthenovelbacterialleucyltrnasynthetaseinhibitorepetraboroleintheintracellularhollowfibersystemmodelofmycobacteriumaviumcomplexlungdisease AT howedavid 1697doseresponsestudiesofthenovelbacterialleucyltrnasynthetaseinhibitorepetraboroleintheintracellularhollowfibersystemmodelofmycobacteriumaviumcomplexlungdisease AT alleymrk 1697doseresponsestudiesofthenovelbacterialleucyltrnasynthetaseinhibitorepetraboroleintheintracellularhollowfibersystemmodelofmycobacteriumaviumcomplexlungdisease AT gumbotawanda 1697doseresponsestudiesofthenovelbacterialleucyltrnasynthetaseinhibitorepetraboroleintheintracellularhollowfibersystemmodelofmycobacteriumaviumcomplexlungdisease |