Cargando…
LB2302. Ceftobiprole Compared to Daptomycin With or Without Optional Aztreonam for the Treatment of Complicated Staphylococcus aureus (SAB): Results of a Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial (ERADICATE)
BACKGROUND: SAB is common, serious, and potentially lethal. Antibiotic options are limited, especially for MRSA. Ceftobiprole is an advanced-generation cephalosporin with bactericidal activity against Gram-positive (including MRSA) and Gram-negative pathogens, with efficacy and safety demonstrated i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752497/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.1892 |
_version_ | 1784850738421170176 |
---|---|
author | Holland, Thomas L Cosgrove, Sara E Doernberg, Sarah B Pavlov, Oleksander Titov, Ivan Atanasov, Boyko Gehr, Maziar Assadi Engelhardt, Marc Hamed, Kamal Ionescu, Daniel Jones, Mark Sauley, Mikael Smart, Jennifer Seifert, Harald Jenkins, Timothy C Turner, Nicholas A Fowler, Vance G |
author_facet | Holland, Thomas L Cosgrove, Sara E Doernberg, Sarah B Pavlov, Oleksander Titov, Ivan Atanasov, Boyko Gehr, Maziar Assadi Engelhardt, Marc Hamed, Kamal Ionescu, Daniel Jones, Mark Sauley, Mikael Smart, Jennifer Seifert, Harald Jenkins, Timothy C Turner, Nicholas A Fowler, Vance G |
author_sort | Holland, Thomas L |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: SAB is common, serious, and potentially lethal. Antibiotic options are limited, especially for MRSA. Ceftobiprole is an advanced-generation cephalosporin with bactericidal activity against Gram-positive (including MRSA) and Gram-negative pathogens, with efficacy and safety demonstrated in previous Phase 3 studies in acute bacterial skin infections and pneumonia. The present study evaluated ceftobiprole in patients with complicated SAB. METHODS: ERADICATE was a randomized (1:1), double-blind, multicenter, Phase 3, non-inferiority trial comparing ceftobiprole (BPR) vs daptomycin (DAP) ± optional aztreonam, for up to 42 days of treatment, in patients with complicated SAB (NCT03138733). The primary efficacy endpoint was overall clinical success 70 days post-randomization, adjudicated by a blinded independent Data Review Committee. Success required survival, no new SAB complications, symptom improvement, SAB clearance, and no receipt of other potentially effective antibiotics. The non-inferiority margin for the difference in success rates was -15% (BPR-DAP, 95% CI, 2-sided, lower bound). Safety was assessed through adverse events (AE) and laboratory data. RESULTS: Of 390 patients randomized, 387 (189 BPR, 198 DAP) were in the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population who received study medication and had a positive baseline blood culture for S. aureus (94 MRSA). Median treatment duration was 21 days for both groups. Key baseline characteristics were balanced (Fig. 1). In the BPR group 69.8% experienced success, compared to 68.7% for DAP (adjusted difference 2.0%, 95% CI -7.1% to 11.1%, Fig. 2). There were no significant differences in mortality, microbiological eradication, or in key subgroup analyses (Fig. 3). The proportion of patients experiencing ≥1 AE was 63% for BPR and 59% for DAP. Treatment-related severe or serious AEs were infrequent. Gastrointestinal AEs, mostly mild nausea, were more frequent with BPR, consistent with data from previous Phase 3 studies. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: Ceftobiprole is non-inferior to daptomycin for overall success in patients with complicated SAB. All-cause mortality, microbiological eradication rates and new SAB complications were similar between treatment groups. Both treatments were well tolerated. DISCLOSURES: Thomas L. Holland, MD, Aridis: Advisor/Consultant|Basilea Pharmaceutica: Advisor/Consultant|Karius: Advisor/Consultant|Lysovant: Advisor/Consultant Sara E. Cosgrove, MD, Basilea: Advisor/Consultant|Debiopharma: Advisor/Consultant Sarah B. Doernberg, MD, MAS, Basilea: Advisor/Consultant|Genentech: Advisor/Consultant|Gilead: Grant/Research Support|Johnson and Johnson: Advisor/Consultant|NIH: Grant/Research Support|Regeneron: Grant/Research Support Maziar Assadi Gehr, MD, Basilea Pharmaceutica: full time employee of Basilea Pharmaceutica International Ltd Marc Engelhardt, MD, Basilea Pharmaceutica: full time employee of Basilea Pharmaceutica International Ltd Kamal Hamed, MD, Basilea Pharmaceutica: previous full time employee of Basilea Pharmaceutica International Ltd|Lysovant: full time employee of Lysovant Daniel Ionescu, MD, Basilea Pharmaceutica: full time employee of Basilea Pharmaceutica International Ltd Mark Jones, PhD, Basilea Pharmaceutica: full time employee of Basilea Pharmaceutica International Ltd Mikael Sauley, MSc, Basilea Pharmaceutica: full time employee of Basilea Pharmaceutica International Ltd Jennifer Smart, PhD, Basilea Pharmaceutica: full time employee of Basilea Pharmaceutica International Ltd Harald Seifert, MD, Basilea Pharmaceutica: Advisor/Consultant|Debiopharm: Advisor/Consultant|Eumedica: Advisor/Consultant|Gilead: Advisor/Consultant|MSD: Advisor/Consultant|Shionogi: Advisor/Consultant Timothy C. Jenkins, MD, Basilea: Clinical outcomes adjudication committee Vance G. Fowler, Jr, MD, MHS, Armata Valanbio Akagera Aridis Roche: Advisor/Consultant|BASILEA: Grant/Research Support|Basilea Novartis Debiopharm Genentech: Advisor/Consultant|MedImmune Bayer Janssen Contrafect Regeneron Destiny Amphliphi Integrated Bioth: Advisor/Consultant|NIH MedImmune Allergan Theravance Novartis Merck Contrafect Karius Genentech Regeneron Janssen: Grant/Research Support. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9752497 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97524972022-12-16 LB2302. Ceftobiprole Compared to Daptomycin With or Without Optional Aztreonam for the Treatment of Complicated Staphylococcus aureus (SAB): Results of a Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial (ERADICATE) Holland, Thomas L Cosgrove, Sara E Doernberg, Sarah B Pavlov, Oleksander Titov, Ivan Atanasov, Boyko Gehr, Maziar Assadi Engelhardt, Marc Hamed, Kamal Ionescu, Daniel Jones, Mark Sauley, Mikael Smart, Jennifer Seifert, Harald Jenkins, Timothy C Turner, Nicholas A Fowler, Vance G Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: SAB is common, serious, and potentially lethal. Antibiotic options are limited, especially for MRSA. Ceftobiprole is an advanced-generation cephalosporin with bactericidal activity against Gram-positive (including MRSA) and Gram-negative pathogens, with efficacy and safety demonstrated in previous Phase 3 studies in acute bacterial skin infections and pneumonia. The present study evaluated ceftobiprole in patients with complicated SAB. METHODS: ERADICATE was a randomized (1:1), double-blind, multicenter, Phase 3, non-inferiority trial comparing ceftobiprole (BPR) vs daptomycin (DAP) ± optional aztreonam, for up to 42 days of treatment, in patients with complicated SAB (NCT03138733). The primary efficacy endpoint was overall clinical success 70 days post-randomization, adjudicated by a blinded independent Data Review Committee. Success required survival, no new SAB complications, symptom improvement, SAB clearance, and no receipt of other potentially effective antibiotics. The non-inferiority margin for the difference in success rates was -15% (BPR-DAP, 95% CI, 2-sided, lower bound). Safety was assessed through adverse events (AE) and laboratory data. RESULTS: Of 390 patients randomized, 387 (189 BPR, 198 DAP) were in the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population who received study medication and had a positive baseline blood culture for S. aureus (94 MRSA). Median treatment duration was 21 days for both groups. Key baseline characteristics were balanced (Fig. 1). In the BPR group 69.8% experienced success, compared to 68.7% for DAP (adjusted difference 2.0%, 95% CI -7.1% to 11.1%, Fig. 2). There were no significant differences in mortality, microbiological eradication, or in key subgroup analyses (Fig. 3). The proportion of patients experiencing ≥1 AE was 63% for BPR and 59% for DAP. Treatment-related severe or serious AEs were infrequent. Gastrointestinal AEs, mostly mild nausea, were more frequent with BPR, consistent with data from previous Phase 3 studies. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: Ceftobiprole is non-inferior to daptomycin for overall success in patients with complicated SAB. All-cause mortality, microbiological eradication rates and new SAB complications were similar between treatment groups. Both treatments were well tolerated. DISCLOSURES: Thomas L. Holland, MD, Aridis: Advisor/Consultant|Basilea Pharmaceutica: Advisor/Consultant|Karius: Advisor/Consultant|Lysovant: Advisor/Consultant Sara E. Cosgrove, MD, Basilea: Advisor/Consultant|Debiopharma: Advisor/Consultant Sarah B. Doernberg, MD, MAS, Basilea: Advisor/Consultant|Genentech: Advisor/Consultant|Gilead: Grant/Research Support|Johnson and Johnson: Advisor/Consultant|NIH: Grant/Research Support|Regeneron: Grant/Research Support Maziar Assadi Gehr, MD, Basilea Pharmaceutica: full time employee of Basilea Pharmaceutica International Ltd Marc Engelhardt, MD, Basilea Pharmaceutica: full time employee of Basilea Pharmaceutica International Ltd Kamal Hamed, MD, Basilea Pharmaceutica: previous full time employee of Basilea Pharmaceutica International Ltd|Lysovant: full time employee of Lysovant Daniel Ionescu, MD, Basilea Pharmaceutica: full time employee of Basilea Pharmaceutica International Ltd Mark Jones, PhD, Basilea Pharmaceutica: full time employee of Basilea Pharmaceutica International Ltd Mikael Sauley, MSc, Basilea Pharmaceutica: full time employee of Basilea Pharmaceutica International Ltd Jennifer Smart, PhD, Basilea Pharmaceutica: full time employee of Basilea Pharmaceutica International Ltd Harald Seifert, MD, Basilea Pharmaceutica: Advisor/Consultant|Debiopharm: Advisor/Consultant|Eumedica: Advisor/Consultant|Gilead: Advisor/Consultant|MSD: Advisor/Consultant|Shionogi: Advisor/Consultant Timothy C. Jenkins, MD, Basilea: Clinical outcomes adjudication committee Vance G. Fowler, Jr, MD, MHS, Armata Valanbio Akagera Aridis Roche: Advisor/Consultant|BASILEA: Grant/Research Support|Basilea Novartis Debiopharm Genentech: Advisor/Consultant|MedImmune Bayer Janssen Contrafect Regeneron Destiny Amphliphi Integrated Bioth: Advisor/Consultant|NIH MedImmune Allergan Theravance Novartis Merck Contrafect Karius Genentech Regeneron Janssen: Grant/Research Support. Oxford University Press 2022-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9752497/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.1892 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Holland, Thomas L Cosgrove, Sara E Doernberg, Sarah B Pavlov, Oleksander Titov, Ivan Atanasov, Boyko Gehr, Maziar Assadi Engelhardt, Marc Hamed, Kamal Ionescu, Daniel Jones, Mark Sauley, Mikael Smart, Jennifer Seifert, Harald Jenkins, Timothy C Turner, Nicholas A Fowler, Vance G LB2302. Ceftobiprole Compared to Daptomycin With or Without Optional Aztreonam for the Treatment of Complicated Staphylococcus aureus (SAB): Results of a Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial (ERADICATE) |
title | LB2302. Ceftobiprole Compared to Daptomycin With or Without Optional Aztreonam for the Treatment of Complicated Staphylococcus aureus (SAB): Results of a Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial (ERADICATE) |
title_full | LB2302. Ceftobiprole Compared to Daptomycin With or Without Optional Aztreonam for the Treatment of Complicated Staphylococcus aureus (SAB): Results of a Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial (ERADICATE) |
title_fullStr | LB2302. Ceftobiprole Compared to Daptomycin With or Without Optional Aztreonam for the Treatment of Complicated Staphylococcus aureus (SAB): Results of a Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial (ERADICATE) |
title_full_unstemmed | LB2302. Ceftobiprole Compared to Daptomycin With or Without Optional Aztreonam for the Treatment of Complicated Staphylococcus aureus (SAB): Results of a Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial (ERADICATE) |
title_short | LB2302. Ceftobiprole Compared to Daptomycin With or Without Optional Aztreonam for the Treatment of Complicated Staphylococcus aureus (SAB): Results of a Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial (ERADICATE) |
title_sort | lb2302. ceftobiprole compared to daptomycin with or without optional aztreonam for the treatment of complicated staphylococcus aureus (sab): results of a phase 3, randomized, double-blind trial (eradicate) |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752497/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.1892 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hollandthomasl lb2302ceftobiprolecomparedtodaptomycinwithorwithoutoptionalaztreonamforthetreatmentofcomplicatedstaphylococcusaureussabresultsofaphase3randomizeddoubleblindtrialeradicate AT cosgrovesarae lb2302ceftobiprolecomparedtodaptomycinwithorwithoutoptionalaztreonamforthetreatmentofcomplicatedstaphylococcusaureussabresultsofaphase3randomizeddoubleblindtrialeradicate AT doernbergsarahb lb2302ceftobiprolecomparedtodaptomycinwithorwithoutoptionalaztreonamforthetreatmentofcomplicatedstaphylococcusaureussabresultsofaphase3randomizeddoubleblindtrialeradicate AT pavlovoleksander lb2302ceftobiprolecomparedtodaptomycinwithorwithoutoptionalaztreonamforthetreatmentofcomplicatedstaphylococcusaureussabresultsofaphase3randomizeddoubleblindtrialeradicate AT titovivan lb2302ceftobiprolecomparedtodaptomycinwithorwithoutoptionalaztreonamforthetreatmentofcomplicatedstaphylococcusaureussabresultsofaphase3randomizeddoubleblindtrialeradicate AT atanasovboyko lb2302ceftobiprolecomparedtodaptomycinwithorwithoutoptionalaztreonamforthetreatmentofcomplicatedstaphylococcusaureussabresultsofaphase3randomizeddoubleblindtrialeradicate AT gehrmaziarassadi lb2302ceftobiprolecomparedtodaptomycinwithorwithoutoptionalaztreonamforthetreatmentofcomplicatedstaphylococcusaureussabresultsofaphase3randomizeddoubleblindtrialeradicate AT engelhardtmarc lb2302ceftobiprolecomparedtodaptomycinwithorwithoutoptionalaztreonamforthetreatmentofcomplicatedstaphylococcusaureussabresultsofaphase3randomizeddoubleblindtrialeradicate AT hamedkamal lb2302ceftobiprolecomparedtodaptomycinwithorwithoutoptionalaztreonamforthetreatmentofcomplicatedstaphylococcusaureussabresultsofaphase3randomizeddoubleblindtrialeradicate AT ionescudaniel lb2302ceftobiprolecomparedtodaptomycinwithorwithoutoptionalaztreonamforthetreatmentofcomplicatedstaphylococcusaureussabresultsofaphase3randomizeddoubleblindtrialeradicate AT jonesmark lb2302ceftobiprolecomparedtodaptomycinwithorwithoutoptionalaztreonamforthetreatmentofcomplicatedstaphylococcusaureussabresultsofaphase3randomizeddoubleblindtrialeradicate AT sauleymikael lb2302ceftobiprolecomparedtodaptomycinwithorwithoutoptionalaztreonamforthetreatmentofcomplicatedstaphylococcusaureussabresultsofaphase3randomizeddoubleblindtrialeradicate AT smartjennifer lb2302ceftobiprolecomparedtodaptomycinwithorwithoutoptionalaztreonamforthetreatmentofcomplicatedstaphylococcusaureussabresultsofaphase3randomizeddoubleblindtrialeradicate AT seifertharald lb2302ceftobiprolecomparedtodaptomycinwithorwithoutoptionalaztreonamforthetreatmentofcomplicatedstaphylococcusaureussabresultsofaphase3randomizeddoubleblindtrialeradicate AT jenkinstimothyc lb2302ceftobiprolecomparedtodaptomycinwithorwithoutoptionalaztreonamforthetreatmentofcomplicatedstaphylococcusaureussabresultsofaphase3randomizeddoubleblindtrialeradicate AT turnernicholasa lb2302ceftobiprolecomparedtodaptomycinwithorwithoutoptionalaztreonamforthetreatmentofcomplicatedstaphylococcusaureussabresultsofaphase3randomizeddoubleblindtrialeradicate AT fowlervanceg lb2302ceftobiprolecomparedtodaptomycinwithorwithoutoptionalaztreonamforthetreatmentofcomplicatedstaphylococcusaureussabresultsofaphase3randomizeddoubleblindtrialeradicate |