Cargando…

1261. Do All Patients Prefer Telehealth Care?

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has threatened health care for many individuals. Restriction of resources, redeployment of staff, and patient reluctance to make clinic appointments disrupts continuity of care of existing patients and limits access to care of new ones. To overcome this, our HIV clinic aggressiv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gudipati, Smitha, Lee, Monica, Huitsing, Joanne, Markowitz, Norman, Brar, Indira
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752520/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.1092
_version_ 1784850744301584384
author Gudipati, Smitha
Lee, Monica
Huitsing, Joanne
Markowitz, Norman
Brar, Indira
author_facet Gudipati, Smitha
Lee, Monica
Huitsing, Joanne
Markowitz, Norman
Brar, Indira
author_sort Gudipati, Smitha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has threatened health care for many individuals. Restriction of resources, redeployment of staff, and patient reluctance to make clinic appointments disrupts continuity of care of existing patients and limits access to care of new ones. To overcome this, our HIV clinic aggressively promoted a telehealth, MyChart (MC) application, and provided smart phone technology to those in need. Despite these efforts, we found that utilization of telehealth accounted for 4.7% of HIV clinic visits, compared to 25% in internal medicine clinics. In this report, we sought to obtain reasons why our patients were reluctant to use telehealth even in the midst of a pandemic. METHODS: All Ryan White (RW) people living with HIV (PLWH) at Henry Ford Hospital that were initiated in our telehealth pilot program were surveyed on the underutilization of MC. Utilization was determined by if PLWH responded to a MC notification sent by the telehealth navigator. Activity level was established on MC (Figure 1), and if PLWH did not respond, they were called as a follow up for survey answers. [Figure: see text] RESULTS: From 10/2020 – 01/2022, 206 PLWH were enrolled into our pilot program and given telehealth education. Of those successfully enrolled: 83.7% were black, 73% male, 57% were older than 45 years, 88% lived in Wayne County, and 27 needed and received pre-loaded smart phones. When contacted, 90 (44%) interacted on MC, 61 (29%) were unable to be reached and 55 (27%) successfully completed the survey (Figure 2). When asked why telehealth was not utilized, 27 (49%) stated they preferred in-person visits (Figure 3). [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: Telehealth programs can help overcome barriers to HIV care and maintain patient engagement when crises interrupt traditional care models. However, our study suggests that our PLWH preferred and felt safe engaging with in-person visits despite telehealth education and smartphone supplementation even in a pandemic. As the future of medicine moves towards telehealth management, we must not forget our vulnerable populations and find opportunities to safely engage with in-person visits. DISCLOSURES: Indira Brar, MD, Gilead: Grant/Research Support|Gilead: speakers bureau|Janssen: Grant/Research Support|Janssen: speakers bureau.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9752520
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97525202022-12-16 1261. Do All Patients Prefer Telehealth Care? Gudipati, Smitha Lee, Monica Huitsing, Joanne Markowitz, Norman Brar, Indira Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has threatened health care for many individuals. Restriction of resources, redeployment of staff, and patient reluctance to make clinic appointments disrupts continuity of care of existing patients and limits access to care of new ones. To overcome this, our HIV clinic aggressively promoted a telehealth, MyChart (MC) application, and provided smart phone technology to those in need. Despite these efforts, we found that utilization of telehealth accounted for 4.7% of HIV clinic visits, compared to 25% in internal medicine clinics. In this report, we sought to obtain reasons why our patients were reluctant to use telehealth even in the midst of a pandemic. METHODS: All Ryan White (RW) people living with HIV (PLWH) at Henry Ford Hospital that were initiated in our telehealth pilot program were surveyed on the underutilization of MC. Utilization was determined by if PLWH responded to a MC notification sent by the telehealth navigator. Activity level was established on MC (Figure 1), and if PLWH did not respond, they were called as a follow up for survey answers. [Figure: see text] RESULTS: From 10/2020 – 01/2022, 206 PLWH were enrolled into our pilot program and given telehealth education. Of those successfully enrolled: 83.7% were black, 73% male, 57% were older than 45 years, 88% lived in Wayne County, and 27 needed and received pre-loaded smart phones. When contacted, 90 (44%) interacted on MC, 61 (29%) were unable to be reached and 55 (27%) successfully completed the survey (Figure 2). When asked why telehealth was not utilized, 27 (49%) stated they preferred in-person visits (Figure 3). [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: Telehealth programs can help overcome barriers to HIV care and maintain patient engagement when crises interrupt traditional care models. However, our study suggests that our PLWH preferred and felt safe engaging with in-person visits despite telehealth education and smartphone supplementation even in a pandemic. As the future of medicine moves towards telehealth management, we must not forget our vulnerable populations and find opportunities to safely engage with in-person visits. DISCLOSURES: Indira Brar, MD, Gilead: Grant/Research Support|Gilead: speakers bureau|Janssen: Grant/Research Support|Janssen: speakers bureau. Oxford University Press 2022-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9752520/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.1092 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Gudipati, Smitha
Lee, Monica
Huitsing, Joanne
Markowitz, Norman
Brar, Indira
1261. Do All Patients Prefer Telehealth Care?
title 1261. Do All Patients Prefer Telehealth Care?
title_full 1261. Do All Patients Prefer Telehealth Care?
title_fullStr 1261. Do All Patients Prefer Telehealth Care?
title_full_unstemmed 1261. Do All Patients Prefer Telehealth Care?
title_short 1261. Do All Patients Prefer Telehealth Care?
title_sort 1261. do all patients prefer telehealth care?
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752520/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.1092
work_keys_str_mv AT gudipatismitha 1261doallpatientsprefertelehealthcare
AT leemonica 1261doallpatientsprefertelehealthcare
AT huitsingjoanne 1261doallpatientsprefertelehealthcare
AT markowitznorman 1261doallpatientsprefertelehealthcare
AT brarindira 1261doallpatientsprefertelehealthcare