Cargando…

2060. Evaluation of the real world incidence of integrase inhibitor resistance since adoption as guideline preferred therapy

BACKGROUND: There are limited data reporting real-world incidence of integrase inhibitor resistance (INSTI-R) since the approval and first-line treatment recommendation of INSTIs in the US. A recent analysis of the national surveillance data estimated INSTI-R to be 6.3%. The purpose of this study wa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Januszka, Jenna, Drwiega, Emily N, Burgos, Rodrigo M, Michienzi, Sarah M, Smith, Renata, Badowski, Melissa E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752527/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.1682
_version_ 1784850746324287488
author Januszka, Jenna
Drwiega, Emily N
Drwiega, Emily N
Burgos, Rodrigo M
Michienzi, Sarah M
Smith, Renata
Badowski, Melissa E
author_facet Januszka, Jenna
Drwiega, Emily N
Drwiega, Emily N
Burgos, Rodrigo M
Michienzi, Sarah M
Smith, Renata
Badowski, Melissa E
author_sort Januszka, Jenna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There are limited data reporting real-world incidence of integrase inhibitor resistance (INSTI-R) since the approval and first-line treatment recommendation of INSTIs in the US. A recent analysis of the national surveillance data estimated INSTI-R to be 6.3%. The purpose of this study was to describe real-world incidence of INSTI-R in patients who used an INSTI-based single tablet regimen (STR) in a major metropolitan area and identify risk factors for resistance. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of adult patients living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) who were prescribed an INSTI-STR between September 2017 and September 2020 and followed for > 12 months at the University of Illinois Chicago Community Clinic Network (UCCN). The primary endpoint was the difference in INSTI-R in UCCN patients compared to the national prevalence of 6.3%. Other outcomes included development of virologic failure (VF), defined as 2 consecutive HIV-1 viral loads (VL) > 200 copies/mL after week 24, and documented INSTI-R mutations. Patient specific factors associated with medication nonadherence were also collected. All endpoints were analyzed using chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests. RESULTS: Of 948 patients screened, 248 patients were included. Baseline characteristics are summarized in Table 1. VF occurred in 17 subjects (6.8%). Two of the 17 (11.8%) received subsequent INSTI-R testing and nine eventually virally suppressed without regimen changes (52.9%). Patients without VF were assumed to have no INSTI-R. No subjects developed INSTI-R, which was significantly less than the national prevalence of 6.3% (p=0.0029). Patients with a high VL at baseline were more likely to experience VF (p=0.001). The most common factors associated with nonadherence in patients with VF are summarized in Table 2. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: The true rate of INSTI-R in UCCN patients is still unknown and factors associated with developing INSTI-R were unable to be assessed. Among patients at UCCN on INSTI-based STRs, INSTI-R rates were lower than the national average. Future analyses should also include patients on INSTI-based non-STR regimens as increased pill burden is a known risk factor for nonadherence leading to VF and drug resistance. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9752527
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97525272022-12-16 2060. Evaluation of the real world incidence of integrase inhibitor resistance since adoption as guideline preferred therapy Januszka, Jenna Drwiega, Emily N Drwiega, Emily N Burgos, Rodrigo M Michienzi, Sarah M Smith, Renata Badowski, Melissa E Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: There are limited data reporting real-world incidence of integrase inhibitor resistance (INSTI-R) since the approval and first-line treatment recommendation of INSTIs in the US. A recent analysis of the national surveillance data estimated INSTI-R to be 6.3%. The purpose of this study was to describe real-world incidence of INSTI-R in patients who used an INSTI-based single tablet regimen (STR) in a major metropolitan area and identify risk factors for resistance. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of adult patients living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) who were prescribed an INSTI-STR between September 2017 and September 2020 and followed for > 12 months at the University of Illinois Chicago Community Clinic Network (UCCN). The primary endpoint was the difference in INSTI-R in UCCN patients compared to the national prevalence of 6.3%. Other outcomes included development of virologic failure (VF), defined as 2 consecutive HIV-1 viral loads (VL) > 200 copies/mL after week 24, and documented INSTI-R mutations. Patient specific factors associated with medication nonadherence were also collected. All endpoints were analyzed using chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests. RESULTS: Of 948 patients screened, 248 patients were included. Baseline characteristics are summarized in Table 1. VF occurred in 17 subjects (6.8%). Two of the 17 (11.8%) received subsequent INSTI-R testing and nine eventually virally suppressed without regimen changes (52.9%). Patients without VF were assumed to have no INSTI-R. No subjects developed INSTI-R, which was significantly less than the national prevalence of 6.3% (p=0.0029). Patients with a high VL at baseline were more likely to experience VF (p=0.001). The most common factors associated with nonadherence in patients with VF are summarized in Table 2. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: The true rate of INSTI-R in UCCN patients is still unknown and factors associated with developing INSTI-R were unable to be assessed. Among patients at UCCN on INSTI-based STRs, INSTI-R rates were lower than the national average. Future analyses should also include patients on INSTI-based non-STR regimens as increased pill burden is a known risk factor for nonadherence leading to VF and drug resistance. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2022-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9752527/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.1682 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Januszka, Jenna
Drwiega, Emily N
Drwiega, Emily N
Burgos, Rodrigo M
Michienzi, Sarah M
Smith, Renata
Badowski, Melissa E
2060. Evaluation of the real world incidence of integrase inhibitor resistance since adoption as guideline preferred therapy
title 2060. Evaluation of the real world incidence of integrase inhibitor resistance since adoption as guideline preferred therapy
title_full 2060. Evaluation of the real world incidence of integrase inhibitor resistance since adoption as guideline preferred therapy
title_fullStr 2060. Evaluation of the real world incidence of integrase inhibitor resistance since adoption as guideline preferred therapy
title_full_unstemmed 2060. Evaluation of the real world incidence of integrase inhibitor resistance since adoption as guideline preferred therapy
title_short 2060. Evaluation of the real world incidence of integrase inhibitor resistance since adoption as guideline preferred therapy
title_sort 2060. evaluation of the real world incidence of integrase inhibitor resistance since adoption as guideline preferred therapy
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752527/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.1682
work_keys_str_mv AT januszkajenna 2060evaluationoftherealworldincidenceofintegraseinhibitorresistancesinceadoptionasguidelinepreferredtherapy
AT drwiegaemilyn 2060evaluationoftherealworldincidenceofintegraseinhibitorresistancesinceadoptionasguidelinepreferredtherapy
AT drwiegaemilyn 2060evaluationoftherealworldincidenceofintegraseinhibitorresistancesinceadoptionasguidelinepreferredtherapy
AT burgosrodrigom 2060evaluationoftherealworldincidenceofintegraseinhibitorresistancesinceadoptionasguidelinepreferredtherapy
AT michienzisarahm 2060evaluationoftherealworldincidenceofintegraseinhibitorresistancesinceadoptionasguidelinepreferredtherapy
AT smithrenata 2060evaluationoftherealworldincidenceofintegraseinhibitorresistancesinceadoptionasguidelinepreferredtherapy
AT badowskimelissae 2060evaluationoftherealworldincidenceofintegraseinhibitorresistancesinceadoptionasguidelinepreferredtherapy