Cargando…

1797. Evaluation of Intravenous vs Oral Antibiotic Therapy at Discharge for the Treatment of Urinary Source Gram-Negative Bacteremia

BACKGROUND: Retrospective studies demonstrate similar efficacy between oral (PO) and intravenous (IV) antibiotics at discharge for gram negative bacteremia (GNB), with reduced duration of hospitalization, hospital costs, and duration of therapy with PO. Understanding current physician discharge prac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yan, Xuping, Song, Matthew, Moore, Sarah E, Swingler, Elena A, Wilde, Ashley M, Bohn, Brian C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752593/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.1427
_version_ 1784850764506595328
author Yan, Xuping
Song, Matthew
Moore, Sarah E
Swingler, Elena A
Wilde, Ashley M
Bohn, Brian C
author_facet Yan, Xuping
Song, Matthew
Moore, Sarah E
Swingler, Elena A
Wilde, Ashley M
Bohn, Brian C
author_sort Yan, Xuping
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Retrospective studies demonstrate similar efficacy between oral (PO) and intravenous (IV) antibiotics at discharge for gram negative bacteremia (GNB), with reduced duration of hospitalization, hospital costs, and duration of therapy with PO. Understanding current physician discharge practices can help guide future antimicrobial stewardship initiatives. METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study was conducted on adult inpatients admitted between July 1, 2020 and June 30, 2021 with urinary source GNB. Patients with both blood and urine cultures positive for Escherichia coli, Klebsiella species, or Proteus mirabilis and a PO antibiotic available at discharge were included. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients discharged on PO antibiotics. Secondary outcomes included duration of hospitalization, total length of therapy, and 30-day readmission secondary to clinical failure or therapeutic complication in the IV and PO at discharge groups. RESULTS: Of the 157 included patients, 128 (82%) were discharged on PO antibiotics. Patients discharged on IV and PO had similar median quick Pitt bacteremia scores [1(IQR, 0 – 2) vs. 1 (IQR, 0 – 1), p=0.420]. Mean duration of hospitalization for patients discharged on IV vs. PO therapy was 5 (SD, 2.91) days vs. 4 (SD, 2.75) days, p=0.001, respectively. Mean total length of antibiotic therapy was 21.6 (SD, 13.80) days as compared to 13.5 (SD, 4.94) days, p=0.017, for the IV vs. PO arms, respectively. Thirty–day readmission rates were 11/29 (38%) and 23/128 (18%), p=0.035, in the IV and PO arms, respectively. Notably, 21/29 (72%) of the IV arm had an organism from blood culture that was susceptible to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX). [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: Most patients with urinary source GNB were discharged on PO antibiotics. Patients discharged on IV antibiotics were more likely to be readmitted within 30 days. Future efforts to decrease IV antibiotic use may focus on increasing TMP-SMX use at discharge. DISCLOSURES: Matthew Song, PharmD, BCIDP, Merck: Stocks/Bonds|ObsEva: Stocks/Bonds.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9752593
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97525932022-12-16 1797. Evaluation of Intravenous vs Oral Antibiotic Therapy at Discharge for the Treatment of Urinary Source Gram-Negative Bacteremia Yan, Xuping Song, Matthew Moore, Sarah E Swingler, Elena A Wilde, Ashley M Bohn, Brian C Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Retrospective studies demonstrate similar efficacy between oral (PO) and intravenous (IV) antibiotics at discharge for gram negative bacteremia (GNB), with reduced duration of hospitalization, hospital costs, and duration of therapy with PO. Understanding current physician discharge practices can help guide future antimicrobial stewardship initiatives. METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study was conducted on adult inpatients admitted between July 1, 2020 and June 30, 2021 with urinary source GNB. Patients with both blood and urine cultures positive for Escherichia coli, Klebsiella species, or Proteus mirabilis and a PO antibiotic available at discharge were included. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients discharged on PO antibiotics. Secondary outcomes included duration of hospitalization, total length of therapy, and 30-day readmission secondary to clinical failure or therapeutic complication in the IV and PO at discharge groups. RESULTS: Of the 157 included patients, 128 (82%) were discharged on PO antibiotics. Patients discharged on IV and PO had similar median quick Pitt bacteremia scores [1(IQR, 0 – 2) vs. 1 (IQR, 0 – 1), p=0.420]. Mean duration of hospitalization for patients discharged on IV vs. PO therapy was 5 (SD, 2.91) days vs. 4 (SD, 2.75) days, p=0.001, respectively. Mean total length of antibiotic therapy was 21.6 (SD, 13.80) days as compared to 13.5 (SD, 4.94) days, p=0.017, for the IV vs. PO arms, respectively. Thirty–day readmission rates were 11/29 (38%) and 23/128 (18%), p=0.035, in the IV and PO arms, respectively. Notably, 21/29 (72%) of the IV arm had an organism from blood culture that was susceptible to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX). [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: Most patients with urinary source GNB were discharged on PO antibiotics. Patients discharged on IV antibiotics were more likely to be readmitted within 30 days. Future efforts to decrease IV antibiotic use may focus on increasing TMP-SMX use at discharge. DISCLOSURES: Matthew Song, PharmD, BCIDP, Merck: Stocks/Bonds|ObsEva: Stocks/Bonds. Oxford University Press 2022-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9752593/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.1427 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Yan, Xuping
Song, Matthew
Moore, Sarah E
Swingler, Elena A
Wilde, Ashley M
Bohn, Brian C
1797. Evaluation of Intravenous vs Oral Antibiotic Therapy at Discharge for the Treatment of Urinary Source Gram-Negative Bacteremia
title 1797. Evaluation of Intravenous vs Oral Antibiotic Therapy at Discharge for the Treatment of Urinary Source Gram-Negative Bacteremia
title_full 1797. Evaluation of Intravenous vs Oral Antibiotic Therapy at Discharge for the Treatment of Urinary Source Gram-Negative Bacteremia
title_fullStr 1797. Evaluation of Intravenous vs Oral Antibiotic Therapy at Discharge for the Treatment of Urinary Source Gram-Negative Bacteremia
title_full_unstemmed 1797. Evaluation of Intravenous vs Oral Antibiotic Therapy at Discharge for the Treatment of Urinary Source Gram-Negative Bacteremia
title_short 1797. Evaluation of Intravenous vs Oral Antibiotic Therapy at Discharge for the Treatment of Urinary Source Gram-Negative Bacteremia
title_sort 1797. evaluation of intravenous vs oral antibiotic therapy at discharge for the treatment of urinary source gram-negative bacteremia
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752593/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.1427
work_keys_str_mv AT yanxuping 1797evaluationofintravenousvsoralantibiotictherapyatdischargeforthetreatmentofurinarysourcegramnegativebacteremia
AT songmatthew 1797evaluationofintravenousvsoralantibiotictherapyatdischargeforthetreatmentofurinarysourcegramnegativebacteremia
AT mooresarahe 1797evaluationofintravenousvsoralantibiotictherapyatdischargeforthetreatmentofurinarysourcegramnegativebacteremia
AT swinglerelenaa 1797evaluationofintravenousvsoralantibiotictherapyatdischargeforthetreatmentofurinarysourcegramnegativebacteremia
AT wildeashleym 1797evaluationofintravenousvsoralantibiotictherapyatdischargeforthetreatmentofurinarysourcegramnegativebacteremia
AT bohnbrianc 1797evaluationofintravenousvsoralantibiotictherapyatdischargeforthetreatmentofurinarysourcegramnegativebacteremia