Cargando…

1190. Effect of Pulsed Xenon Ultraviolet Light (PX-UV) on Clonal Recovery of Escherichia coli in a Prospective, Sham-controlled, Double-blinded, Interventional, Crossover Trial Conducted in Two Detroit Hospitals

BACKGROUND: Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) can be caused by some multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli, most commonly due to production of an extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL), and lead to increased morbidity and mortality. Pulsed Xenon Ultraviolet light (PX-UV), in combination with te...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Navarathna, Thanuri, Chatterjee, Piyali, Ashby, Landon, Choi, Hosoon, Hwang, Munok, Dhar, Sorabh, Kaye, Keith S, Jinadatha, Chetan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752602/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.1025
_version_ 1784850766883717120
author Navarathna, Thanuri
Chatterjee, Piyali
Ashby, Landon
Choi, Hosoon
Hwang, Munok
Dhar, Sorabh
Kaye, Keith S
Jinadatha, Chetan
author_facet Navarathna, Thanuri
Chatterjee, Piyali
Ashby, Landon
Choi, Hosoon
Hwang, Munok
Dhar, Sorabh
Kaye, Keith S
Jinadatha, Chetan
author_sort Navarathna, Thanuri
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) can be caused by some multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli, most commonly due to production of an extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL), and lead to increased morbidity and mortality. Pulsed Xenon Ultraviolet light (PX-UV), in combination with terminal cleaning, has been shown to improve disinfection and has the potential to lower HAIs by reducing the horizontal spread of infections in hospitals. Here, we assess the effect of PX-UV on the clonal recovery pattern of several E. coli sequence types (STs) using Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS). METHODS: A prospective, sham-controlled, double-blinded, interventional, crossover trial was conducted to compare standard terminal cleaning with PX-UV (intervention, Group Q) and standard terminal cleaning with sham UV (control, Group W) in 2 Detroit hospitals from 2017 to 2020. Treatments lasted 12 months before crossover, with a 6-month washout period in between (Group R) during which UV was not used. A total of 67 E. coli samples were collected. WGS of the isolates was performed using the Nextseq 550 (Illumina). After de novo assembly, BioNumerics calculation engine (v7.6) was used to complete Whole Genome Multilocus Sequence Type (wgMLST) analysis, assembly free and assembly-based call, and construction of minimum spanning tree (MST). RESULTS: The total number of different STs found for the intervention UV device group (Q) and the sham UV device group (W) was 6 while the washout group (R) was 5. Out of the 9 total STs obtained, the most common was ST131 (Table 1). In Group Q, 11 of ST131 were found; 15 were found in Group W. During the washout period (R) 17 of ST131 were found. All other STs had 3 or less circulating clusters. After UV treatment ST1193, ST399, and ST7394 were not recovered. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: During UV intervention 3 different STs (ST1193, ST399, ST7394) were not recovered, but there were negligible changes to the frequency of recovery of the other 6 STs as compared to sham UV treatment. ST131 was the dominant E. coli ST found in Detroit, which is consistent with previously published data stating ST131 as the predominant strain. While PX-UV has previously demonstrated effectiveness on decreasing bioburden, our data does not indicate any remarkable change in clonality and prevalence of E. coli STs after PX-UV use. DISCLOSURES: Piyali Chatterjee, PhD, AHRQ Grant # 1R03HS027667-01: Grant/Research Support|AHRQ Grant # 1R03HS027667-01: Central Texas Veterans Health Care System Keith S. Kaye, MD, MPH, Allecra: Advisor/Consultant|GlaxoSmithKline plc.: Receiving symposia honoraria|GlaxoSmithKline plc.: GlaxoSmithKline plc.-sponsored study 212502|Merck: Advisor/Consultant|qpex: Advisor/Consultant|Shionogi: Grant/Research Support|Spero: Advisor/Consultant Chetan Jinadatha, MD, MPH, AHRQ R01 Grant-5R01HS025598: Grant/Research Support|EOS Surfaces: Copper Coupons and materials for testing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9752602
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97526022022-12-16 1190. Effect of Pulsed Xenon Ultraviolet Light (PX-UV) on Clonal Recovery of Escherichia coli in a Prospective, Sham-controlled, Double-blinded, Interventional, Crossover Trial Conducted in Two Detroit Hospitals Navarathna, Thanuri Chatterjee, Piyali Ashby, Landon Choi, Hosoon Hwang, Munok Dhar, Sorabh Kaye, Keith S Jinadatha, Chetan Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) can be caused by some multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli, most commonly due to production of an extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL), and lead to increased morbidity and mortality. Pulsed Xenon Ultraviolet light (PX-UV), in combination with terminal cleaning, has been shown to improve disinfection and has the potential to lower HAIs by reducing the horizontal spread of infections in hospitals. Here, we assess the effect of PX-UV on the clonal recovery pattern of several E. coli sequence types (STs) using Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS). METHODS: A prospective, sham-controlled, double-blinded, interventional, crossover trial was conducted to compare standard terminal cleaning with PX-UV (intervention, Group Q) and standard terminal cleaning with sham UV (control, Group W) in 2 Detroit hospitals from 2017 to 2020. Treatments lasted 12 months before crossover, with a 6-month washout period in between (Group R) during which UV was not used. A total of 67 E. coli samples were collected. WGS of the isolates was performed using the Nextseq 550 (Illumina). After de novo assembly, BioNumerics calculation engine (v7.6) was used to complete Whole Genome Multilocus Sequence Type (wgMLST) analysis, assembly free and assembly-based call, and construction of minimum spanning tree (MST). RESULTS: The total number of different STs found for the intervention UV device group (Q) and the sham UV device group (W) was 6 while the washout group (R) was 5. Out of the 9 total STs obtained, the most common was ST131 (Table 1). In Group Q, 11 of ST131 were found; 15 were found in Group W. During the washout period (R) 17 of ST131 were found. All other STs had 3 or less circulating clusters. After UV treatment ST1193, ST399, and ST7394 were not recovered. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: During UV intervention 3 different STs (ST1193, ST399, ST7394) were not recovered, but there were negligible changes to the frequency of recovery of the other 6 STs as compared to sham UV treatment. ST131 was the dominant E. coli ST found in Detroit, which is consistent with previously published data stating ST131 as the predominant strain. While PX-UV has previously demonstrated effectiveness on decreasing bioburden, our data does not indicate any remarkable change in clonality and prevalence of E. coli STs after PX-UV use. DISCLOSURES: Piyali Chatterjee, PhD, AHRQ Grant # 1R03HS027667-01: Grant/Research Support|AHRQ Grant # 1R03HS027667-01: Central Texas Veterans Health Care System Keith S. Kaye, MD, MPH, Allecra: Advisor/Consultant|GlaxoSmithKline plc.: Receiving symposia honoraria|GlaxoSmithKline plc.: GlaxoSmithKline plc.-sponsored study 212502|Merck: Advisor/Consultant|qpex: Advisor/Consultant|Shionogi: Grant/Research Support|Spero: Advisor/Consultant Chetan Jinadatha, MD, MPH, AHRQ R01 Grant-5R01HS025598: Grant/Research Support|EOS Surfaces: Copper Coupons and materials for testing. Oxford University Press 2022-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9752602/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.1025 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Navarathna, Thanuri
Chatterjee, Piyali
Ashby, Landon
Choi, Hosoon
Hwang, Munok
Dhar, Sorabh
Kaye, Keith S
Jinadatha, Chetan
1190. Effect of Pulsed Xenon Ultraviolet Light (PX-UV) on Clonal Recovery of Escherichia coli in a Prospective, Sham-controlled, Double-blinded, Interventional, Crossover Trial Conducted in Two Detroit Hospitals
title 1190. Effect of Pulsed Xenon Ultraviolet Light (PX-UV) on Clonal Recovery of Escherichia coli in a Prospective, Sham-controlled, Double-blinded, Interventional, Crossover Trial Conducted in Two Detroit Hospitals
title_full 1190. Effect of Pulsed Xenon Ultraviolet Light (PX-UV) on Clonal Recovery of Escherichia coli in a Prospective, Sham-controlled, Double-blinded, Interventional, Crossover Trial Conducted in Two Detroit Hospitals
title_fullStr 1190. Effect of Pulsed Xenon Ultraviolet Light (PX-UV) on Clonal Recovery of Escherichia coli in a Prospective, Sham-controlled, Double-blinded, Interventional, Crossover Trial Conducted in Two Detroit Hospitals
title_full_unstemmed 1190. Effect of Pulsed Xenon Ultraviolet Light (PX-UV) on Clonal Recovery of Escherichia coli in a Prospective, Sham-controlled, Double-blinded, Interventional, Crossover Trial Conducted in Two Detroit Hospitals
title_short 1190. Effect of Pulsed Xenon Ultraviolet Light (PX-UV) on Clonal Recovery of Escherichia coli in a Prospective, Sham-controlled, Double-blinded, Interventional, Crossover Trial Conducted in Two Detroit Hospitals
title_sort 1190. effect of pulsed xenon ultraviolet light (px-uv) on clonal recovery of escherichia coli in a prospective, sham-controlled, double-blinded, interventional, crossover trial conducted in two detroit hospitals
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752602/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.1025
work_keys_str_mv AT navarathnathanuri 1190effectofpulsedxenonultravioletlightpxuvonclonalrecoveryofescherichiacoliinaprospectiveshamcontrolleddoubleblindedinterventionalcrossovertrialconductedintwodetroithospitals
AT chatterjeepiyali 1190effectofpulsedxenonultravioletlightpxuvonclonalrecoveryofescherichiacoliinaprospectiveshamcontrolleddoubleblindedinterventionalcrossovertrialconductedintwodetroithospitals
AT ashbylandon 1190effectofpulsedxenonultravioletlightpxuvonclonalrecoveryofescherichiacoliinaprospectiveshamcontrolleddoubleblindedinterventionalcrossovertrialconductedintwodetroithospitals
AT choihosoon 1190effectofpulsedxenonultravioletlightpxuvonclonalrecoveryofescherichiacoliinaprospectiveshamcontrolleddoubleblindedinterventionalcrossovertrialconductedintwodetroithospitals
AT hwangmunok 1190effectofpulsedxenonultravioletlightpxuvonclonalrecoveryofescherichiacoliinaprospectiveshamcontrolleddoubleblindedinterventionalcrossovertrialconductedintwodetroithospitals
AT dharsorabh 1190effectofpulsedxenonultravioletlightpxuvonclonalrecoveryofescherichiacoliinaprospectiveshamcontrolleddoubleblindedinterventionalcrossovertrialconductedintwodetroithospitals
AT kayekeiths 1190effectofpulsedxenonultravioletlightpxuvonclonalrecoveryofescherichiacoliinaprospectiveshamcontrolleddoubleblindedinterventionalcrossovertrialconductedintwodetroithospitals
AT jinadathachetan 1190effectofpulsedxenonultravioletlightpxuvonclonalrecoveryofescherichiacoliinaprospectiveshamcontrolleddoubleblindedinterventionalcrossovertrialconductedintwodetroithospitals