Cargando…
1958. Longitudinal SARS-COV-2 anti-spike antibody response in pregnant people with natural infection and variable vaccine uptake
BACKGROUND: Natural SARS-CoV-2 infection results in anti-nucleocapsid (N) and anti-spike (S) antibody (Ab) development. Anti-S Ab response (conferred by infection and/or vaccination) is more closely associated with protection. We evaluated anti-N/S Ab responses in vaccinated (> 1 dose) and unvacc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752645/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.1584 |
_version_ | 1784850778439024640 |
---|---|
author | LaCourse, Sylvia M Aurelio, Morgan C Escudero, Jaclyn N Ellington, Sascha R Zapata, Lauren B Snead, Margaret C Yamamoto, Krissy Salerno, Carol C Greninger, Alexander L Kachikis, Alisa B Englund, Janet A Drake, Alison L |
author_facet | LaCourse, Sylvia M Aurelio, Morgan C Escudero, Jaclyn N Ellington, Sascha R Zapata, Lauren B Snead, Margaret C Yamamoto, Krissy Salerno, Carol C Greninger, Alexander L Kachikis, Alisa B Englund, Janet A Drake, Alison L |
author_sort | LaCourse, Sylvia M |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Natural SARS-CoV-2 infection results in anti-nucleocapsid (N) and anti-spike (S) antibody (Ab) development. Anti-S Ab response (conferred by infection and/or vaccination) is more closely associated with protection. We evaluated anti-N/S Ab responses in vaccinated (> 1 dose) and unvaccinated pregnant people with prior SAR-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: During January 2021-March 2022, we enrolled participants with SARS-CoV-2 infection identified in pregnancy (26 via anti-N IgG+; 52 via prior RT-PCR+). Baseline, 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months, and delivery samples were tested for anti-N (index ≥ 1.4 positive) and anti-S (≥ 50 AU/mL positive) IgG Ab by Abbott Architect. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to measure Ab response duration. RESULTS: Among 78 participants, 62 (79%) enrolled in pregnancy (median 27 weeks gestation), and 16 (21%) at delivery/postpartum (median 2 weeks); 34 (44%) had received ≥1 vaccine prior to initial Ab testing. At baseline, 59 (75%) participants had concordant anti-N/S positive results (median anti-N index 3.58 [IQR 2.01-5.82], median anti-S 5529 AU/ml [IQR 687-25000]). Anti-S IgG was higher (25000 vs 774, p< 0.001) among participants receiving ≥1 vaccine vs no vaccine, while anti-N IgG indices were similar. Among 59 participants with initial anti-N IgG+ results, median time to anti-N IgG negative results was 31 weeks after first RT-PCR+ (median 17 weeks after first anti-N IgG+ result). Only 1 (unvaccinated) participant had an anti-S IgG negative result by 22 weeks after first RT-PCR+ result. Among 30 participants with delivery samples (median 16 weeks after RT-PCR+, 12 weeks after baseline anti-N IgG+ samples), 15 (52%) remained anti-N IgG+; 29 (97%) remained anti-S IgG+. Anti-S IgG was higher (25000 vs 826 AU/ml, p< 0.001) among participants receiving ≥ 1 vaccine vs. no vaccine prior to delivery. CONCLUSION: Among pregnant persons with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, duration of anti-S IgG response was longer than anti-N IgG irrespective of vaccine status; vaccination during pregnancy was associated with higher anti-S levels at baseline and delivery. While anti-S IgG were detectable for ≥ 6 months, longer term follow-up is needed to assess durability of hybrid immunity vs. infection alone and has implications for maternal and infant protection. DISCLOSURES: Sylvia M. LaCourse, MD, MPH, Aurum Institute: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Grant/Research Support Alexander L. Greninger, MD, PhD, Abbott: Contract Testing|Cepheid: Contract Testing|Gilead: Grant/Research Support|Gilead: Contract Testing|Hologic: Contract Testing|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Novavax: Contract Testing|Pfizer: Contract Testing Alisa B. Kachikis, MD, MSc, GSK: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant Janet A. Englund, MD, AstraZeneca: Advisor/Consultant|AstraZeneca: Grant/Research Support|GlaxoSmithKline: Grant/Research Support|Meissa Vaccines: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support|Sanofi Pasteur: Advisor/Consultant Alison L. Drake, PhD, MPH, Merck: Grant/Research Support. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9752645 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97526452022-12-16 1958. Longitudinal SARS-COV-2 anti-spike antibody response in pregnant people with natural infection and variable vaccine uptake LaCourse, Sylvia M Aurelio, Morgan C Escudero, Jaclyn N Ellington, Sascha R Zapata, Lauren B Snead, Margaret C Yamamoto, Krissy Salerno, Carol C Greninger, Alexander L Kachikis, Alisa B Englund, Janet A Drake, Alison L Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Natural SARS-CoV-2 infection results in anti-nucleocapsid (N) and anti-spike (S) antibody (Ab) development. Anti-S Ab response (conferred by infection and/or vaccination) is more closely associated with protection. We evaluated anti-N/S Ab responses in vaccinated (> 1 dose) and unvaccinated pregnant people with prior SAR-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: During January 2021-March 2022, we enrolled participants with SARS-CoV-2 infection identified in pregnancy (26 via anti-N IgG+; 52 via prior RT-PCR+). Baseline, 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months, and delivery samples were tested for anti-N (index ≥ 1.4 positive) and anti-S (≥ 50 AU/mL positive) IgG Ab by Abbott Architect. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to measure Ab response duration. RESULTS: Among 78 participants, 62 (79%) enrolled in pregnancy (median 27 weeks gestation), and 16 (21%) at delivery/postpartum (median 2 weeks); 34 (44%) had received ≥1 vaccine prior to initial Ab testing. At baseline, 59 (75%) participants had concordant anti-N/S positive results (median anti-N index 3.58 [IQR 2.01-5.82], median anti-S 5529 AU/ml [IQR 687-25000]). Anti-S IgG was higher (25000 vs 774, p< 0.001) among participants receiving ≥1 vaccine vs no vaccine, while anti-N IgG indices were similar. Among 59 participants with initial anti-N IgG+ results, median time to anti-N IgG negative results was 31 weeks after first RT-PCR+ (median 17 weeks after first anti-N IgG+ result). Only 1 (unvaccinated) participant had an anti-S IgG negative result by 22 weeks after first RT-PCR+ result. Among 30 participants with delivery samples (median 16 weeks after RT-PCR+, 12 weeks after baseline anti-N IgG+ samples), 15 (52%) remained anti-N IgG+; 29 (97%) remained anti-S IgG+. Anti-S IgG was higher (25000 vs 826 AU/ml, p< 0.001) among participants receiving ≥ 1 vaccine vs. no vaccine prior to delivery. CONCLUSION: Among pregnant persons with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, duration of anti-S IgG response was longer than anti-N IgG irrespective of vaccine status; vaccination during pregnancy was associated with higher anti-S levels at baseline and delivery. While anti-S IgG were detectable for ≥ 6 months, longer term follow-up is needed to assess durability of hybrid immunity vs. infection alone and has implications for maternal and infant protection. DISCLOSURES: Sylvia M. LaCourse, MD, MPH, Aurum Institute: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Grant/Research Support Alexander L. Greninger, MD, PhD, Abbott: Contract Testing|Cepheid: Contract Testing|Gilead: Grant/Research Support|Gilead: Contract Testing|Hologic: Contract Testing|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Novavax: Contract Testing|Pfizer: Contract Testing Alisa B. Kachikis, MD, MSc, GSK: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant Janet A. Englund, MD, AstraZeneca: Advisor/Consultant|AstraZeneca: Grant/Research Support|GlaxoSmithKline: Grant/Research Support|Meissa Vaccines: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support|Sanofi Pasteur: Advisor/Consultant Alison L. Drake, PhD, MPH, Merck: Grant/Research Support. Oxford University Press 2022-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9752645/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.1584 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Abstracts LaCourse, Sylvia M Aurelio, Morgan C Escudero, Jaclyn N Ellington, Sascha R Zapata, Lauren B Snead, Margaret C Yamamoto, Krissy Salerno, Carol C Greninger, Alexander L Kachikis, Alisa B Englund, Janet A Drake, Alison L 1958. Longitudinal SARS-COV-2 anti-spike antibody response in pregnant people with natural infection and variable vaccine uptake |
title | 1958. Longitudinal SARS-COV-2 anti-spike antibody response in pregnant people with natural infection and variable vaccine uptake |
title_full | 1958. Longitudinal SARS-COV-2 anti-spike antibody response in pregnant people with natural infection and variable vaccine uptake |
title_fullStr | 1958. Longitudinal SARS-COV-2 anti-spike antibody response in pregnant people with natural infection and variable vaccine uptake |
title_full_unstemmed | 1958. Longitudinal SARS-COV-2 anti-spike antibody response in pregnant people with natural infection and variable vaccine uptake |
title_short | 1958. Longitudinal SARS-COV-2 anti-spike antibody response in pregnant people with natural infection and variable vaccine uptake |
title_sort | 1958. longitudinal sars-cov-2 anti-spike antibody response in pregnant people with natural infection and variable vaccine uptake |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752645/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.1584 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lacoursesylviam 1958longitudinalsarscov2antispikeantibodyresponseinpregnantpeoplewithnaturalinfectionandvariablevaccineuptake AT aureliomorganc 1958longitudinalsarscov2antispikeantibodyresponseinpregnantpeoplewithnaturalinfectionandvariablevaccineuptake AT escuderojaclynn 1958longitudinalsarscov2antispikeantibodyresponseinpregnantpeoplewithnaturalinfectionandvariablevaccineuptake AT ellingtonsaschar 1958longitudinalsarscov2antispikeantibodyresponseinpregnantpeoplewithnaturalinfectionandvariablevaccineuptake AT zapatalaurenb 1958longitudinalsarscov2antispikeantibodyresponseinpregnantpeoplewithnaturalinfectionandvariablevaccineuptake AT sneadmargaretc 1958longitudinalsarscov2antispikeantibodyresponseinpregnantpeoplewithnaturalinfectionandvariablevaccineuptake AT yamamotokrissy 1958longitudinalsarscov2antispikeantibodyresponseinpregnantpeoplewithnaturalinfectionandvariablevaccineuptake AT salernocarolc 1958longitudinalsarscov2antispikeantibodyresponseinpregnantpeoplewithnaturalinfectionandvariablevaccineuptake AT greningeralexanderl 1958longitudinalsarscov2antispikeantibodyresponseinpregnantpeoplewithnaturalinfectionandvariablevaccineuptake AT kachikisalisab 1958longitudinalsarscov2antispikeantibodyresponseinpregnantpeoplewithnaturalinfectionandvariablevaccineuptake AT englundjaneta 1958longitudinalsarscov2antispikeantibodyresponseinpregnantpeoplewithnaturalinfectionandvariablevaccineuptake AT drakealisonl 1958longitudinalsarscov2antispikeantibodyresponseinpregnantpeoplewithnaturalinfectionandvariablevaccineuptake |