Cargando…

1958. Longitudinal SARS-COV-2 anti-spike antibody response in pregnant people with natural infection and variable vaccine uptake

BACKGROUND: Natural SARS-CoV-2 infection results in anti-nucleocapsid (N) and anti-spike (S) antibody (Ab) development. Anti-S Ab response (conferred by infection and/or vaccination) is more closely associated with protection. We evaluated anti-N/S Ab responses in vaccinated (> 1 dose) and unvacc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: LaCourse, Sylvia M, Aurelio, Morgan C, Escudero, Jaclyn N, Ellington, Sascha R, Zapata, Lauren B, Snead, Margaret C, Yamamoto, Krissy, Salerno, Carol C, Greninger, Alexander L, Kachikis, Alisa B, Englund, Janet A, Drake, Alison L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752645/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.1584
_version_ 1784850778439024640
author LaCourse, Sylvia M
Aurelio, Morgan C
Escudero, Jaclyn N
Ellington, Sascha R
Zapata, Lauren B
Snead, Margaret C
Yamamoto, Krissy
Salerno, Carol C
Greninger, Alexander L
Kachikis, Alisa B
Englund, Janet A
Drake, Alison L
author_facet LaCourse, Sylvia M
Aurelio, Morgan C
Escudero, Jaclyn N
Ellington, Sascha R
Zapata, Lauren B
Snead, Margaret C
Yamamoto, Krissy
Salerno, Carol C
Greninger, Alexander L
Kachikis, Alisa B
Englund, Janet A
Drake, Alison L
author_sort LaCourse, Sylvia M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Natural SARS-CoV-2 infection results in anti-nucleocapsid (N) and anti-spike (S) antibody (Ab) development. Anti-S Ab response (conferred by infection and/or vaccination) is more closely associated with protection. We evaluated anti-N/S Ab responses in vaccinated (> 1 dose) and unvaccinated pregnant people with prior SAR-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: During January 2021-March 2022, we enrolled participants with SARS-CoV-2 infection identified in pregnancy (26 via anti-N IgG+; 52 via prior RT-PCR+). Baseline, 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months, and delivery samples were tested for anti-N (index ≥ 1.4 positive) and anti-S (≥ 50 AU/mL positive) IgG Ab by Abbott Architect. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to measure Ab response duration. RESULTS: Among 78 participants, 62 (79%) enrolled in pregnancy (median 27 weeks gestation), and 16 (21%) at delivery/postpartum (median 2 weeks); 34 (44%) had received ≥1 vaccine prior to initial Ab testing. At baseline, 59 (75%) participants had concordant anti-N/S positive results (median anti-N index 3.58 [IQR 2.01-5.82], median anti-S 5529 AU/ml [IQR 687-25000]). Anti-S IgG was higher (25000 vs 774, p< 0.001) among participants receiving ≥1 vaccine vs no vaccine, while anti-N IgG indices were similar. Among 59 participants with initial anti-N IgG+ results, median time to anti-N IgG negative results was 31 weeks after first RT-PCR+ (median 17 weeks after first anti-N IgG+ result). Only 1 (unvaccinated) participant had an anti-S IgG negative result by 22 weeks after first RT-PCR+ result. Among 30 participants with delivery samples (median 16 weeks after RT-PCR+, 12 weeks after baseline anti-N IgG+ samples), 15 (52%) remained anti-N IgG+; 29 (97%) remained anti-S IgG+. Anti-S IgG was higher (25000 vs 826 AU/ml, p< 0.001) among participants receiving ≥ 1 vaccine vs. no vaccine prior to delivery. CONCLUSION: Among pregnant persons with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, duration of anti-S IgG response was longer than anti-N IgG irrespective of vaccine status; vaccination during pregnancy was associated with higher anti-S levels at baseline and delivery. While anti-S IgG were detectable for ≥ 6 months, longer term follow-up is needed to assess durability of hybrid immunity vs. infection alone and has implications for maternal and infant protection. DISCLOSURES: Sylvia M. LaCourse, MD, MPH, Aurum Institute: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Grant/Research Support Alexander L. Greninger, MD, PhD, Abbott: Contract Testing|Cepheid: Contract Testing|Gilead: Grant/Research Support|Gilead: Contract Testing|Hologic: Contract Testing|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Novavax: Contract Testing|Pfizer: Contract Testing Alisa B. Kachikis, MD, MSc, GSK: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant Janet A. Englund, MD, AstraZeneca: Advisor/Consultant|AstraZeneca: Grant/Research Support|GlaxoSmithKline: Grant/Research Support|Meissa Vaccines: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support|Sanofi Pasteur: Advisor/Consultant Alison L. Drake, PhD, MPH, Merck: Grant/Research Support.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9752645
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97526452022-12-16 1958. Longitudinal SARS-COV-2 anti-spike antibody response in pregnant people with natural infection and variable vaccine uptake LaCourse, Sylvia M Aurelio, Morgan C Escudero, Jaclyn N Ellington, Sascha R Zapata, Lauren B Snead, Margaret C Yamamoto, Krissy Salerno, Carol C Greninger, Alexander L Kachikis, Alisa B Englund, Janet A Drake, Alison L Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Natural SARS-CoV-2 infection results in anti-nucleocapsid (N) and anti-spike (S) antibody (Ab) development. Anti-S Ab response (conferred by infection and/or vaccination) is more closely associated with protection. We evaluated anti-N/S Ab responses in vaccinated (> 1 dose) and unvaccinated pregnant people with prior SAR-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: During January 2021-March 2022, we enrolled participants with SARS-CoV-2 infection identified in pregnancy (26 via anti-N IgG+; 52 via prior RT-PCR+). Baseline, 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months, and delivery samples were tested for anti-N (index ≥ 1.4 positive) and anti-S (≥ 50 AU/mL positive) IgG Ab by Abbott Architect. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to measure Ab response duration. RESULTS: Among 78 participants, 62 (79%) enrolled in pregnancy (median 27 weeks gestation), and 16 (21%) at delivery/postpartum (median 2 weeks); 34 (44%) had received ≥1 vaccine prior to initial Ab testing. At baseline, 59 (75%) participants had concordant anti-N/S positive results (median anti-N index 3.58 [IQR 2.01-5.82], median anti-S 5529 AU/ml [IQR 687-25000]). Anti-S IgG was higher (25000 vs 774, p< 0.001) among participants receiving ≥1 vaccine vs no vaccine, while anti-N IgG indices were similar. Among 59 participants with initial anti-N IgG+ results, median time to anti-N IgG negative results was 31 weeks after first RT-PCR+ (median 17 weeks after first anti-N IgG+ result). Only 1 (unvaccinated) participant had an anti-S IgG negative result by 22 weeks after first RT-PCR+ result. Among 30 participants with delivery samples (median 16 weeks after RT-PCR+, 12 weeks after baseline anti-N IgG+ samples), 15 (52%) remained anti-N IgG+; 29 (97%) remained anti-S IgG+. Anti-S IgG was higher (25000 vs 826 AU/ml, p< 0.001) among participants receiving ≥ 1 vaccine vs. no vaccine prior to delivery. CONCLUSION: Among pregnant persons with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, duration of anti-S IgG response was longer than anti-N IgG irrespective of vaccine status; vaccination during pregnancy was associated with higher anti-S levels at baseline and delivery. While anti-S IgG were detectable for ≥ 6 months, longer term follow-up is needed to assess durability of hybrid immunity vs. infection alone and has implications for maternal and infant protection. DISCLOSURES: Sylvia M. LaCourse, MD, MPH, Aurum Institute: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Grant/Research Support Alexander L. Greninger, MD, PhD, Abbott: Contract Testing|Cepheid: Contract Testing|Gilead: Grant/Research Support|Gilead: Contract Testing|Hologic: Contract Testing|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Novavax: Contract Testing|Pfizer: Contract Testing Alisa B. Kachikis, MD, MSc, GSK: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant Janet A. Englund, MD, AstraZeneca: Advisor/Consultant|AstraZeneca: Grant/Research Support|GlaxoSmithKline: Grant/Research Support|Meissa Vaccines: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support|Sanofi Pasteur: Advisor/Consultant Alison L. Drake, PhD, MPH, Merck: Grant/Research Support. Oxford University Press 2022-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9752645/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.1584 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
LaCourse, Sylvia M
Aurelio, Morgan C
Escudero, Jaclyn N
Ellington, Sascha R
Zapata, Lauren B
Snead, Margaret C
Yamamoto, Krissy
Salerno, Carol C
Greninger, Alexander L
Kachikis, Alisa B
Englund, Janet A
Drake, Alison L
1958. Longitudinal SARS-COV-2 anti-spike antibody response in pregnant people with natural infection and variable vaccine uptake
title 1958. Longitudinal SARS-COV-2 anti-spike antibody response in pregnant people with natural infection and variable vaccine uptake
title_full 1958. Longitudinal SARS-COV-2 anti-spike antibody response in pregnant people with natural infection and variable vaccine uptake
title_fullStr 1958. Longitudinal SARS-COV-2 anti-spike antibody response in pregnant people with natural infection and variable vaccine uptake
title_full_unstemmed 1958. Longitudinal SARS-COV-2 anti-spike antibody response in pregnant people with natural infection and variable vaccine uptake
title_short 1958. Longitudinal SARS-COV-2 anti-spike antibody response in pregnant people with natural infection and variable vaccine uptake
title_sort 1958. longitudinal sars-cov-2 anti-spike antibody response in pregnant people with natural infection and variable vaccine uptake
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752645/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.1584
work_keys_str_mv AT lacoursesylviam 1958longitudinalsarscov2antispikeantibodyresponseinpregnantpeoplewithnaturalinfectionandvariablevaccineuptake
AT aureliomorganc 1958longitudinalsarscov2antispikeantibodyresponseinpregnantpeoplewithnaturalinfectionandvariablevaccineuptake
AT escuderojaclynn 1958longitudinalsarscov2antispikeantibodyresponseinpregnantpeoplewithnaturalinfectionandvariablevaccineuptake
AT ellingtonsaschar 1958longitudinalsarscov2antispikeantibodyresponseinpregnantpeoplewithnaturalinfectionandvariablevaccineuptake
AT zapatalaurenb 1958longitudinalsarscov2antispikeantibodyresponseinpregnantpeoplewithnaturalinfectionandvariablevaccineuptake
AT sneadmargaretc 1958longitudinalsarscov2antispikeantibodyresponseinpregnantpeoplewithnaturalinfectionandvariablevaccineuptake
AT yamamotokrissy 1958longitudinalsarscov2antispikeantibodyresponseinpregnantpeoplewithnaturalinfectionandvariablevaccineuptake
AT salernocarolc 1958longitudinalsarscov2antispikeantibodyresponseinpregnantpeoplewithnaturalinfectionandvariablevaccineuptake
AT greningeralexanderl 1958longitudinalsarscov2antispikeantibodyresponseinpregnantpeoplewithnaturalinfectionandvariablevaccineuptake
AT kachikisalisab 1958longitudinalsarscov2antispikeantibodyresponseinpregnantpeoplewithnaturalinfectionandvariablevaccineuptake
AT englundjaneta 1958longitudinalsarscov2antispikeantibodyresponseinpregnantpeoplewithnaturalinfectionandvariablevaccineuptake
AT drakealisonl 1958longitudinalsarscov2antispikeantibodyresponseinpregnantpeoplewithnaturalinfectionandvariablevaccineuptake