Cargando…
1280. Real-World Comparison of HIV-ASSIST with Expert Opinion in Selecting Antiretroviral Therapy for Complex Patients
BACKGROUND: HIV-ASSIST is an online, clinical decision support tool that helps HIV clinicians select antiretroviral (ARV) regimens for patients with HIV by accounting for individual patient characteristics. Concordance between HIV-ASSIST recommendations and expert opinion has been reported to be as...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752659/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.1111 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: HIV-ASSIST is an online, clinical decision support tool that helps HIV clinicians select antiretroviral (ARV) regimens for patients with HIV by accounting for individual patient characteristics. Concordance between HIV-ASSIST recommendations and expert opinion has been reported to be as high as 89% in treatment-experienced patients. We evaluated the utility of the HIV-ASSIST tool for a heavily treatment-experienced, complex patient population at the University of California, San Diego (UCSD) by comparing regimens recommended by HIV-ASSIST with regimens recommended by HIV experts. METHODS: We identified 14 patients through a routine HIV drug resistance teaching conference at our clinic. Each case was reviewed by 5 HIV clinical experts who independently recommended an ARV regimen. A consensus “best” regimen was agreed upon among the 5 experts for each patient. Consensus regimens were compared for concordance to the top 5 regimens recommended by the HIV-ASSIST tool. HIV-ASSIST regimens were also reviewed to determine if any were high or moderate risk for virologic failure due to patient or resistance characteristics, or drug-drug interactions (DDIs). RESULTS: The patients analyzed were medically and psychosocially complex, with a high rate of multi-class resistance (Table 1). Expert-recommended regimens were concordant with one of the top five regimens recommended by the HIV-ASSIST tool for 4/14 (28%) patients (Table 2). We further classified 20/70 (29%) regimens as high risk for virologic failure and 12/70 (17%) regimens as moderate risk for virologic failure (Figure 1). [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: Compared to prior reports, we found lower concordance between ART regimens recommended by HIV experts vs those recommended by the HIV-ASSIST tool in patients with HIV drug-resistance and/or complex comorbidities and potential DDIs. Moreover, several HIV-ASSIST regimens were considered at risk for virologic failure. We recommend caution in using the HIV-ASSIST tool for complex patients with significant drug resistance. DISCLOSURES: Lucas Hill, PharmD, AAHIVP, Gilead Sciences: Speakers Bureau. |
---|