Cargando…

16. Evaluation of a Monkeypox virus PCR assay and suggestions for future improvement

BACKGROUND: Monkeypox virus is an Orthopoxvirus in the Poxviridae family currently responsible for an ongoing global epidemic including active transmission in all 50 US states. To date, nearly 12,000 US cases have been confirmed, with the largest case count in New York State, where over 2,500 cases...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Fan, Murnane, Courtney, Joseph, Ansamma, Duong, Scott, Lemon, Jamie, Juretschko, Stefan, Streva, Vincent
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752666/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.1867
_version_ 1784850783715459072
author Zhang, Fan
Murnane, Courtney
Joseph, Ansamma
Duong, Scott
Lemon, Jamie
Juretschko, Stefan
Streva, Vincent
author_facet Zhang, Fan
Murnane, Courtney
Joseph, Ansamma
Duong, Scott
Lemon, Jamie
Juretschko, Stefan
Streva, Vincent
author_sort Zhang, Fan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Monkeypox virus is an Orthopoxvirus in the Poxviridae family currently responsible for an ongoing global epidemic including active transmission in all 50 US states. To date, nearly 12,000 US cases have been confirmed, with the largest case count in New York State, where over 2,500 cases have been confirmed. Of these, the vast majority (greater than 90%) of cases are residents of New York City (NYC). Nearly all described cases have been identified in men, predominantly in men who have sex with men. Until recently, laboratory testing for Monkeypox virus was limited to state and local public health laboratories or the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Northwell Health is the largest healthcare provider in the NYC region and is responsible for molecular PCR testing for over 25 hospitals in the area. METHODS: We describe the evaluation of two real-time PCR assays developed by the CDC: one specific for Monkeypox virus and the other a generic Orthopoxvirus assay. We describe performance characteristics in a high-prevalence patient population, identify room for improvement in future assay iterations, and discuss potential scalability of the assay and portability to an ultra high-throughput platform. RESULTS: We evaluated the CDC Orthopoxvirus and Monkeypox virus PCR assays using 50 clinical specimens collected from patients presenting with lesions. We determined the limit of detection for both assays is 250 copies/mL. Additionally the assays are highly specific with no cross-reactivity with other viruses tested, including HSV-1, HSV-2, and VZV. One significant limitation is the high rate of indeterminate results due to the use of an RNase P specimen control. Indeterminate results were not the result of assay inhibition and may be from inadequate specimen collection. However, since RNase P signal was often absent in positive specimens, the clinical impact of the RNase P result is questionable. CONCLUSION: The CDC Orthopoxvirus and Monkeypox virus PCR assays were useful tools for clinical laboratories to launch rapid testing capacity for these viruses early in the course of the outbreak. However, limitations of the assays prevent them from being expanded to more high-throughput testing platforms. Moving forward, additional work is needed to optimize these PCR assays for more widespread clinical use. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9752666
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97526662022-12-16 16. Evaluation of a Monkeypox virus PCR assay and suggestions for future improvement Zhang, Fan Murnane, Courtney Joseph, Ansamma Duong, Scott Lemon, Jamie Juretschko, Stefan Streva, Vincent Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Monkeypox virus is an Orthopoxvirus in the Poxviridae family currently responsible for an ongoing global epidemic including active transmission in all 50 US states. To date, nearly 12,000 US cases have been confirmed, with the largest case count in New York State, where over 2,500 cases have been confirmed. Of these, the vast majority (greater than 90%) of cases are residents of New York City (NYC). Nearly all described cases have been identified in men, predominantly in men who have sex with men. Until recently, laboratory testing for Monkeypox virus was limited to state and local public health laboratories or the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Northwell Health is the largest healthcare provider in the NYC region and is responsible for molecular PCR testing for over 25 hospitals in the area. METHODS: We describe the evaluation of two real-time PCR assays developed by the CDC: one specific for Monkeypox virus and the other a generic Orthopoxvirus assay. We describe performance characteristics in a high-prevalence patient population, identify room for improvement in future assay iterations, and discuss potential scalability of the assay and portability to an ultra high-throughput platform. RESULTS: We evaluated the CDC Orthopoxvirus and Monkeypox virus PCR assays using 50 clinical specimens collected from patients presenting with lesions. We determined the limit of detection for both assays is 250 copies/mL. Additionally the assays are highly specific with no cross-reactivity with other viruses tested, including HSV-1, HSV-2, and VZV. One significant limitation is the high rate of indeterminate results due to the use of an RNase P specimen control. Indeterminate results were not the result of assay inhibition and may be from inadequate specimen collection. However, since RNase P signal was often absent in positive specimens, the clinical impact of the RNase P result is questionable. CONCLUSION: The CDC Orthopoxvirus and Monkeypox virus PCR assays were useful tools for clinical laboratories to launch rapid testing capacity for these viruses early in the course of the outbreak. However, limitations of the assays prevent them from being expanded to more high-throughput testing platforms. Moving forward, additional work is needed to optimize these PCR assays for more widespread clinical use. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2022-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9752666/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.1867 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Zhang, Fan
Murnane, Courtney
Joseph, Ansamma
Duong, Scott
Lemon, Jamie
Juretschko, Stefan
Streva, Vincent
16. Evaluation of a Monkeypox virus PCR assay and suggestions for future improvement
title 16. Evaluation of a Monkeypox virus PCR assay and suggestions for future improvement
title_full 16. Evaluation of a Monkeypox virus PCR assay and suggestions for future improvement
title_fullStr 16. Evaluation of a Monkeypox virus PCR assay and suggestions for future improvement
title_full_unstemmed 16. Evaluation of a Monkeypox virus PCR assay and suggestions for future improvement
title_short 16. Evaluation of a Monkeypox virus PCR assay and suggestions for future improvement
title_sort 16. evaluation of a monkeypox virus pcr assay and suggestions for future improvement
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752666/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.1867
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangfan 16evaluationofamonkeypoxviruspcrassayandsuggestionsforfutureimprovement
AT murnanecourtney 16evaluationofamonkeypoxviruspcrassayandsuggestionsforfutureimprovement
AT josephansamma 16evaluationofamonkeypoxviruspcrassayandsuggestionsforfutureimprovement
AT duongscott 16evaluationofamonkeypoxviruspcrassayandsuggestionsforfutureimprovement
AT lemonjamie 16evaluationofamonkeypoxviruspcrassayandsuggestionsforfutureimprovement
AT juretschkostefan 16evaluationofamonkeypoxviruspcrassayandsuggestionsforfutureimprovement
AT strevavincent 16evaluationofamonkeypoxviruspcrassayandsuggestionsforfutureimprovement