Cargando…
1986. Multicenter evaluation of Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic valve infective endocarditis with and without gentamicin treatment: Is it time to revisit?
BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic valve infective endocarditis (SA-PVIE) is associated with high mortality. Gentamicin (GEN) with anti-staphylococcal antibiotics and rifampin are guideline recommendations for SA-PVIE extrapolated from in vitro data. GEN can lead to acute kidney injury (AK...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752687/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.1611 |
_version_ | 1784850789130305536 |
---|---|
author | Pham, Tho H Molina, Kyle C Erdman, Grace Miller, Matthew A Huang, Vanthida |
author_facet | Pham, Tho H Molina, Kyle C Erdman, Grace Miller, Matthew A Huang, Vanthida |
author_sort | Pham, Tho H |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic valve infective endocarditis (SA-PVIE) is associated with high mortality. Gentamicin (GEN) with anti-staphylococcal antibiotics and rifampin are guideline recommendations for SA-PVIE extrapolated from in vitro data. GEN can lead to acute kidney injury (AKI), meanwhile, the clinical benefit on infection-related outcomes remains unclear. Therefore, we evaluated the impact of GEN on outcomes in SA-PVIE. METHODS: This is a multicenter, retrospective cohort conducted at HonorHealth and UCHealth systems. Adults admitted between January 2014-2022 with definite/possible SA-PVIE by Duke Criteria were included if they received ≥2 days of treatment within 2 days of index culture. Cohorts were stratified by GEN receipt. The primary outcome was 90-day all-cause mortality. The secondary outcomes were treatment failure (change in antimicrobials, abscess development, new indication for cardiac surgery), 30-day all-cause mortality, and incidence of AKI by KDIGO Criteria. RESULTS: Overall, 38 patients with definite (40%) and possible SA-PVIE (60%) met inclusion (13 GEN, 25 without GEN [no-GEN]). At baseline, 15 (40%) patients were in an ICU, median Pitt bacteremia score was 2, and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus predominated (71%). A total of 10 (26%) patients had valve surgery; median bacteremia duration was similar between GEN and no-GEN (4 vs 3 days, p = 0.26). Common antibiotics were vancomycin (95%), cefazolin (63%), and nafcillin (21%); rifampin was more common in GEN than no-GEN (20% vs 77%, p < 0.001). Baseline AKI (44% vs 46%) and renal impairment (8% vs 0%) were not different between GEN and no-GEN, respectively. GEN was initiated a median 3 days after index culture, most commonly as intermittent strategy (69%) with 3 mg/kg daily equivalent (84.6%). There was no statistical difference in treatment failure (23% vs 24%, p=0.17), 30-day mortality (20% vs 39%, p=0.22), or 90-day mortality (28% vs 43%, p=0.263) between GEN and no-GEN, respectively. Three in the (23%) GEN group experienced AKI, compared to 10 (40%) in no-GEN. CONCLUSION: We did not find that the addition of GEN to SA-PVIE therapy enhanced mortality benefit, yet patients without GEN may live to experience adverse events. Further studies were warranted. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9752687 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97526872022-12-16 1986. Multicenter evaluation of Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic valve infective endocarditis with and without gentamicin treatment: Is it time to revisit? Pham, Tho H Molina, Kyle C Erdman, Grace Miller, Matthew A Huang, Vanthida Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic valve infective endocarditis (SA-PVIE) is associated with high mortality. Gentamicin (GEN) with anti-staphylococcal antibiotics and rifampin are guideline recommendations for SA-PVIE extrapolated from in vitro data. GEN can lead to acute kidney injury (AKI), meanwhile, the clinical benefit on infection-related outcomes remains unclear. Therefore, we evaluated the impact of GEN on outcomes in SA-PVIE. METHODS: This is a multicenter, retrospective cohort conducted at HonorHealth and UCHealth systems. Adults admitted between January 2014-2022 with definite/possible SA-PVIE by Duke Criteria were included if they received ≥2 days of treatment within 2 days of index culture. Cohorts were stratified by GEN receipt. The primary outcome was 90-day all-cause mortality. The secondary outcomes were treatment failure (change in antimicrobials, abscess development, new indication for cardiac surgery), 30-day all-cause mortality, and incidence of AKI by KDIGO Criteria. RESULTS: Overall, 38 patients with definite (40%) and possible SA-PVIE (60%) met inclusion (13 GEN, 25 without GEN [no-GEN]). At baseline, 15 (40%) patients were in an ICU, median Pitt bacteremia score was 2, and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus predominated (71%). A total of 10 (26%) patients had valve surgery; median bacteremia duration was similar between GEN and no-GEN (4 vs 3 days, p = 0.26). Common antibiotics were vancomycin (95%), cefazolin (63%), and nafcillin (21%); rifampin was more common in GEN than no-GEN (20% vs 77%, p < 0.001). Baseline AKI (44% vs 46%) and renal impairment (8% vs 0%) were not different between GEN and no-GEN, respectively. GEN was initiated a median 3 days after index culture, most commonly as intermittent strategy (69%) with 3 mg/kg daily equivalent (84.6%). There was no statistical difference in treatment failure (23% vs 24%, p=0.17), 30-day mortality (20% vs 39%, p=0.22), or 90-day mortality (28% vs 43%, p=0.263) between GEN and no-GEN, respectively. Three in the (23%) GEN group experienced AKI, compared to 10 (40%) in no-GEN. CONCLUSION: We did not find that the addition of GEN to SA-PVIE therapy enhanced mortality benefit, yet patients without GEN may live to experience adverse events. Further studies were warranted. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2022-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9752687/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.1611 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Pham, Tho H Molina, Kyle C Erdman, Grace Miller, Matthew A Huang, Vanthida 1986. Multicenter evaluation of Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic valve infective endocarditis with and without gentamicin treatment: Is it time to revisit? |
title | 1986. Multicenter evaluation of Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic valve infective endocarditis with and without gentamicin treatment: Is it time to revisit? |
title_full | 1986. Multicenter evaluation of Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic valve infective endocarditis with and without gentamicin treatment: Is it time to revisit? |
title_fullStr | 1986. Multicenter evaluation of Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic valve infective endocarditis with and without gentamicin treatment: Is it time to revisit? |
title_full_unstemmed | 1986. Multicenter evaluation of Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic valve infective endocarditis with and without gentamicin treatment: Is it time to revisit? |
title_short | 1986. Multicenter evaluation of Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic valve infective endocarditis with and without gentamicin treatment: Is it time to revisit? |
title_sort | 1986. multicenter evaluation of staphylococcus aureus prosthetic valve infective endocarditis with and without gentamicin treatment: is it time to revisit? |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752687/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.1611 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT phamthoh 1986multicenterevaluationofstaphylococcusaureusprostheticvalveinfectiveendocarditiswithandwithoutgentamicintreatmentisittimetorevisit AT molinakylec 1986multicenterevaluationofstaphylococcusaureusprostheticvalveinfectiveendocarditiswithandwithoutgentamicintreatmentisittimetorevisit AT erdmangrace 1986multicenterevaluationofstaphylococcusaureusprostheticvalveinfectiveendocarditiswithandwithoutgentamicintreatmentisittimetorevisit AT millermatthewa 1986multicenterevaluationofstaphylococcusaureusprostheticvalveinfectiveendocarditiswithandwithoutgentamicintreatmentisittimetorevisit AT huangvanthida 1986multicenterevaluationofstaphylococcusaureusprostheticvalveinfectiveendocarditiswithandwithoutgentamicintreatmentisittimetorevisit |