Cargando…

1782. Antimicrobial Stewardship Opportunities in Gram-Negative Bacteremia Treatment at a Community Teaching Hospital

BACKGROUND: Gram Negative Bacteremia (GNB) is frequently encountered among hospitalized patients. In contrast to traditional 14-day lengths of treatment (LOT), recent literature supports a shorter (7-day) LOT for uncomplicated GNB with adequate source control, and the effectiveness of oral antibioti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ficinski, Matthew, Laguio-Vila, Maryrose R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752733/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.1412
_version_ 1784850800009281536
author Ficinski, Matthew
Laguio-Vila, Maryrose R
author_facet Ficinski, Matthew
Laguio-Vila, Maryrose R
author_sort Ficinski, Matthew
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Gram Negative Bacteremia (GNB) is frequently encountered among hospitalized patients. In contrast to traditional 14-day lengths of treatment (LOT), recent literature supports a shorter (7-day) LOT for uncomplicated GNB with adequate source control, and the effectiveness of oral antibiotics. The goal of the following is to outline current practices of GNB treatment and identify opportunities for antibiotic stewardship (AS). METHODS: This study retrospectively reviewed all cases of uncomplicated GNB at a 528-bed community teaching hospital in Rochester, NY from January 2021 through March 2022. Demographic, laboratory, microbiologic, antibiotic therapy data, results of follow-up blood cultures (FUBC), hospital length of stay and 30-day readmission were collected. Exclusions were complicated or polymicrobial bacteremia, deaths during treatment, or prolonged hospitalization due to other medical factors. Influences of Infectious diseases (ID) or AS consult on treatment and outcomes were compared to cases with no consult. Continuous variables were analyzed using unpaired t-tests; categorical variables were analyzed using Fischer’s exact test and Chi-square as appropriate. RESULTS: 133 cases met inclusion criteria. Demographic and laboratory data are in Table 1. The frequency of bacteria isolated and source of infection are in Figure 1 and Figure 2. ID was significantly more often consulted for central line infections (17% vs 3%, p=0.01), and significantly less frequently involved in urinary tract infections (39% vs 69%, p=0.009). While total LOT were similarly longer than current literature supports (11.7 vs 12.5 days, p=0.2644), cases without ID consultation received significantly more days of oral treatment (4.7 vs 7.1 days, p=0.0275). There were no significant differences between receipt and no receipt of AS recommendations. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: GNB continued to receive longer LOTs than current literature recommends, with longer IV durations recommended by ID consultants compared to those without ID consult. Educational initiatives regarding the safety of shorter LOT for GNB, including the efficacy of oral antibiotics, are needed and should include ID specialists. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9752733
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97527332022-12-16 1782. Antimicrobial Stewardship Opportunities in Gram-Negative Bacteremia Treatment at a Community Teaching Hospital Ficinski, Matthew Laguio-Vila, Maryrose R Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Gram Negative Bacteremia (GNB) is frequently encountered among hospitalized patients. In contrast to traditional 14-day lengths of treatment (LOT), recent literature supports a shorter (7-day) LOT for uncomplicated GNB with adequate source control, and the effectiveness of oral antibiotics. The goal of the following is to outline current practices of GNB treatment and identify opportunities for antibiotic stewardship (AS). METHODS: This study retrospectively reviewed all cases of uncomplicated GNB at a 528-bed community teaching hospital in Rochester, NY from January 2021 through March 2022. Demographic, laboratory, microbiologic, antibiotic therapy data, results of follow-up blood cultures (FUBC), hospital length of stay and 30-day readmission were collected. Exclusions were complicated or polymicrobial bacteremia, deaths during treatment, or prolonged hospitalization due to other medical factors. Influences of Infectious diseases (ID) or AS consult on treatment and outcomes were compared to cases with no consult. Continuous variables were analyzed using unpaired t-tests; categorical variables were analyzed using Fischer’s exact test and Chi-square as appropriate. RESULTS: 133 cases met inclusion criteria. Demographic and laboratory data are in Table 1. The frequency of bacteria isolated and source of infection are in Figure 1 and Figure 2. ID was significantly more often consulted for central line infections (17% vs 3%, p=0.01), and significantly less frequently involved in urinary tract infections (39% vs 69%, p=0.009). While total LOT were similarly longer than current literature supports (11.7 vs 12.5 days, p=0.2644), cases without ID consultation received significantly more days of oral treatment (4.7 vs 7.1 days, p=0.0275). There were no significant differences between receipt and no receipt of AS recommendations. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: GNB continued to receive longer LOTs than current literature recommends, with longer IV durations recommended by ID consultants compared to those without ID consult. Educational initiatives regarding the safety of shorter LOT for GNB, including the efficacy of oral antibiotics, are needed and should include ID specialists. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2022-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9752733/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.1412 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Ficinski, Matthew
Laguio-Vila, Maryrose R
1782. Antimicrobial Stewardship Opportunities in Gram-Negative Bacteremia Treatment at a Community Teaching Hospital
title 1782. Antimicrobial Stewardship Opportunities in Gram-Negative Bacteremia Treatment at a Community Teaching Hospital
title_full 1782. Antimicrobial Stewardship Opportunities in Gram-Negative Bacteremia Treatment at a Community Teaching Hospital
title_fullStr 1782. Antimicrobial Stewardship Opportunities in Gram-Negative Bacteremia Treatment at a Community Teaching Hospital
title_full_unstemmed 1782. Antimicrobial Stewardship Opportunities in Gram-Negative Bacteremia Treatment at a Community Teaching Hospital
title_short 1782. Antimicrobial Stewardship Opportunities in Gram-Negative Bacteremia Treatment at a Community Teaching Hospital
title_sort 1782. antimicrobial stewardship opportunities in gram-negative bacteremia treatment at a community teaching hospital
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752733/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.1412
work_keys_str_mv AT ficinskimatthew 1782antimicrobialstewardshipopportunitiesingramnegativebacteremiatreatmentatacommunityteachinghospital
AT laguiovilamaryroser 1782antimicrobialstewardshipopportunitiesingramnegativebacteremiatreatmentatacommunityteachinghospital