Cargando…

1303. Making Infectious Disease Fellowship More Rashional: A Needs Assessment of Program Directors

BACKGROUND: Many infectious diseases present with rashes. Despite this, limited data have been published regarding dermatology training in infectious disease (ID) fellowships. We aimed to understand the perceived importance, current effectiveness, and existence of dermatology curricula for ID fellow...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rockney, Danica, Tackett, Sean, Melia, Michael T
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752737/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.1134
_version_ 1784850801126014976
author Rockney, Danica
Tackett, Sean
Melia, Michael T
author_facet Rockney, Danica
Tackett, Sean
Melia, Michael T
author_sort Rockney, Danica
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Many infectious diseases present with rashes. Despite this, limited data have been published regarding dermatology training in infectious disease (ID) fellowships. We aimed to understand the perceived importance, current effectiveness, and existence of dermatology curricula for ID fellows in the United States (US). METHODS: Over four weeks in March-April 2022, we emailed US ID fellowship program directors (PDs) individualized links to a Qualtrics survey. Up to two reminder emails were sent. Using NRMP Match Results and Data, we identified 151 PDs. Email addresses were found for 147 PDs. Descriptive data analysis was performed. This study was IRB exempt. RESULTS: Response rate was 91/147 (62%). Most PDs (79/91, 87%) felt like it was very-to-extremely important for ID fellows to know basic dermatologic manifestations of infections (Image 1), though 91% (82/90) felt that they were only slightly-to-moderately effective at preparing fellows for this (Image 2). Most (55/90; 61%) programs do not have a formal dermatology curriculum for their fellows. Lack of faculty capacity, lack of reliable resources, and other topics taking priority were most commonly selected as significant barriers to implementing a dermatology curriculum (Image 3). Of the programs that do not have a dermatology curriculum, 76% (41/54) of PDs were interested in incorporating an externally produced dermatology curriculum with synchronous lectures (81%), asynchronous content (78%), and flipped classroom guides (72%) being the most favored educational strategies. For programs that currently have a dermatology curriculum (35/90, 39%), 67% (22/33) of PDs felt their fellows found their current dermatology curriculum very-to-extremely valuable. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: These data indicate that current ID training often does not include formal dermatology-ID training. This data, along with a planned focus group of fellows, will help inform the development of a dermatology-ID curriculum to help address this content gap and improve ID fellowship education. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9752737
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97527372022-12-16 1303. Making Infectious Disease Fellowship More Rashional: A Needs Assessment of Program Directors Rockney, Danica Tackett, Sean Melia, Michael T Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Many infectious diseases present with rashes. Despite this, limited data have been published regarding dermatology training in infectious disease (ID) fellowships. We aimed to understand the perceived importance, current effectiveness, and existence of dermatology curricula for ID fellows in the United States (US). METHODS: Over four weeks in March-April 2022, we emailed US ID fellowship program directors (PDs) individualized links to a Qualtrics survey. Up to two reminder emails were sent. Using NRMP Match Results and Data, we identified 151 PDs. Email addresses were found for 147 PDs. Descriptive data analysis was performed. This study was IRB exempt. RESULTS: Response rate was 91/147 (62%). Most PDs (79/91, 87%) felt like it was very-to-extremely important for ID fellows to know basic dermatologic manifestations of infections (Image 1), though 91% (82/90) felt that they were only slightly-to-moderately effective at preparing fellows for this (Image 2). Most (55/90; 61%) programs do not have a formal dermatology curriculum for their fellows. Lack of faculty capacity, lack of reliable resources, and other topics taking priority were most commonly selected as significant barriers to implementing a dermatology curriculum (Image 3). Of the programs that do not have a dermatology curriculum, 76% (41/54) of PDs were interested in incorporating an externally produced dermatology curriculum with synchronous lectures (81%), asynchronous content (78%), and flipped classroom guides (72%) being the most favored educational strategies. For programs that currently have a dermatology curriculum (35/90, 39%), 67% (22/33) of PDs felt their fellows found their current dermatology curriculum very-to-extremely valuable. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: These data indicate that current ID training often does not include formal dermatology-ID training. This data, along with a planned focus group of fellows, will help inform the development of a dermatology-ID curriculum to help address this content gap and improve ID fellowship education. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2022-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9752737/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.1134 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Rockney, Danica
Tackett, Sean
Melia, Michael T
1303. Making Infectious Disease Fellowship More Rashional: A Needs Assessment of Program Directors
title 1303. Making Infectious Disease Fellowship More Rashional: A Needs Assessment of Program Directors
title_full 1303. Making Infectious Disease Fellowship More Rashional: A Needs Assessment of Program Directors
title_fullStr 1303. Making Infectious Disease Fellowship More Rashional: A Needs Assessment of Program Directors
title_full_unstemmed 1303. Making Infectious Disease Fellowship More Rashional: A Needs Assessment of Program Directors
title_short 1303. Making Infectious Disease Fellowship More Rashional: A Needs Assessment of Program Directors
title_sort 1303. making infectious disease fellowship more rashional: a needs assessment of program directors
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752737/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.1134
work_keys_str_mv AT rockneydanica 1303makinginfectiousdiseasefellowshipmorerashionalaneedsassessmentofprogramdirectors
AT tackettsean 1303makinginfectiousdiseasefellowshipmorerashionalaneedsassessmentofprogramdirectors
AT meliamichaelt 1303makinginfectiousdiseasefellowshipmorerashionalaneedsassessmentofprogramdirectors