Cargando…

1720. In Vitro Activity of Aztreonam-Avibactam and Comparator Agents Against Enterobacterales from Patients with Urinary Tract Infections Collected During the ATLAS Global Surveillance Program, 2017-2020

BACKGROUND: β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (Eba) frequently carry resistance mechanisms for multiple drug classes, limiting treatment options. Avibactam (AVI) inhibits class A, class C, and some class D serine β-lactamases, while aztreonam (ATM) is refractory to hydrolysis by class B metallo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Estabrook, Mark, Arhin, Francis, Sahm, Daniel F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752746/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.1350
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (Eba) frequently carry resistance mechanisms for multiple drug classes, limiting treatment options. Avibactam (AVI) inhibits class A, class C, and some class D serine β-lactamases, while aztreonam (ATM) is refractory to hydrolysis by class B metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs). ATM-AVI is being developed for use against drug-resistant isolates of Eba, especially those co-producing MBLs and serine β-lactamases. This study evaluated the in vitro activity of ATM-AVI and comparators against Eba collected in 2017-2020 from patients with urinary tract infections (UTI) as part of the ATLAS global surveillance program. METHODS: Non-duplicate clinical isolates were collected from 239 sites in 55 countries in Europe, Latin America, Asia/Pacific (excluding mainland China and India), and Middle East/Africa. Susceptibility testing was performed by CLSI broth microdilution and interpreted using CLSI 2022 and FDA (tigecycline) breakpoints. PCR and sequencing were used to determine the β-lactamase genes present in all isolates with meropenem MIC >1 µg/mL, and Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp. and Proteus mirabilis with ATM or ceftazidime MIC >1 µg/mL. RESULTS: Based on MIC(90) values, ATM-AVI was at least as active as every comparator agent tested against all 15085 Eba isolates collected from UTI (0.12 µg/ml; table), with only five isolates testing with MIC values >8 µg/ml (not shown). Against resistant subsets of isolates, MIC(90) values for ATM-AVI were 0.25-0.5 µg/ml, 4- to 8-fold lower than any comparator tested. Against MBL-positive isolates, ATM-AVI MIC values ranged from ≤0.015-2 µg/ml with the exception of one Escherichia coli isolate testing with an MIC value of 16 µg/ml that carried NDM-5, CMY-145, CTX-M-55 and TEM (not shown). [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: Based on MIC(90) values, ATM-AVI was the most potent agent tested against drug-resistant and MBL-positive subsets of Eba collected from UTI. Based on the potent in vitro activity of ATM-AVI, continued development of this combination for treatment of UTI caused by drug-resistant Eba is warranted. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures.