Cargando…

1055. Comparison of Scoring systems in Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized with COVID 19

BACKGROUND: Previous scoring systems have been proposed to predict COVID19 outcomes, however none have been universally adopted. Two scoring systems of interest are Monoclonal Antibody Screening Score (MASS) and Oral Antiviral and Monoclonal Antibody Screening Score (OMASS). MASS prioritized patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Anderson, Dieckhaus, Kevin, Chirch, Lisa M, Bath, Roopjeet K, Abrantes-Figueiredo, Jessica, Onwochei, Jennifer, Holtzman, Assaf, Tailor, Neelam, Kuo, Chia-Ling
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752808/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.896
_version_ 1784850818688614400
author Huang, Anderson
Dieckhaus, Kevin
Chirch, Lisa M
Bath, Roopjeet K
Abrantes-Figueiredo, Jessica
Onwochei, Jennifer
Holtzman, Assaf
Tailor, Neelam
Kuo, Chia-Ling
author_facet Huang, Anderson
Dieckhaus, Kevin
Chirch, Lisa M
Bath, Roopjeet K
Abrantes-Figueiredo, Jessica
Onwochei, Jennifer
Holtzman, Assaf
Tailor, Neelam
Kuo, Chia-Ling
author_sort Huang, Anderson
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Previous scoring systems have been proposed to predict COVID19 outcomes, however none have been universally adopted. Two scoring systems of interest are Monoclonal Antibody Screening Score (MASS) and Oral Antiviral and Monoclonal Antibody Screening Score (OMASS). MASS prioritized patients for outpatient monoclonal antibody treatment based on risk of hospitalization, and OMASS was a modified version of MASS used to prioritize outpatient oral antivirals. We created a modified scoring system (UCH2021) incorporating vaccination status. These scores (table 1) have not been used to predict in-hospital clinical outcomes. We investigate these systems’ abilities to predict mortality and oxygen requirements in hospitalized COVID19 patients. They do not require blood tests and allow for more rapid triage. [Figure: see text] METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on 133 patients in two tertiary care centers between March and Sept. 2020 with RT-PCR confirmed SARS CoV2. Baseline risk factors were collected and MASS, OMASS, and UCH2021 were calculated. Primary outcomes included mortality, need for intubation, and need for supplemental oxygen >6L during hospitalization. Secondary analysis assessed if any individual risk factors were associated with those outcomes. These systems were evaluated via area under the curve calculations. Two groups based on an outcome were compared using two-sample t-tests for continuous variables and Fisher’s exact tests for categorical variables. RESULTS: All three systems demonstrated some discriminative power for mortality (table 2), but not for oxygen and intubation requirements. There was statistically significant difference in age between survivors and deceased (table 3), and BMI for oxygen requirements (table 4). Other risk factors were not predictive of mortality or oxygen requirement. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: The MASS, OMASS, and UCH2021 score all had predictive power in determining in-hospital mortality, with moderate accuracy, however none were predictive of oxygen requirements. Age and BMI were also good predictors of mortality and oxygen requirements respectively. This study was completed prior to vaccine distribution in the US. Further studies would be helpful to assess if UCH2021 score has greater discriminative power in samples with vaccinated patients. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9752808
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97528082022-12-16 1055. Comparison of Scoring systems in Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized with COVID 19 Huang, Anderson Dieckhaus, Kevin Chirch, Lisa M Bath, Roopjeet K Abrantes-Figueiredo, Jessica Onwochei, Jennifer Holtzman, Assaf Tailor, Neelam Kuo, Chia-Ling Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Previous scoring systems have been proposed to predict COVID19 outcomes, however none have been universally adopted. Two scoring systems of interest are Monoclonal Antibody Screening Score (MASS) and Oral Antiviral and Monoclonal Antibody Screening Score (OMASS). MASS prioritized patients for outpatient monoclonal antibody treatment based on risk of hospitalization, and OMASS was a modified version of MASS used to prioritize outpatient oral antivirals. We created a modified scoring system (UCH2021) incorporating vaccination status. These scores (table 1) have not been used to predict in-hospital clinical outcomes. We investigate these systems’ abilities to predict mortality and oxygen requirements in hospitalized COVID19 patients. They do not require blood tests and allow for more rapid triage. [Figure: see text] METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on 133 patients in two tertiary care centers between March and Sept. 2020 with RT-PCR confirmed SARS CoV2. Baseline risk factors were collected and MASS, OMASS, and UCH2021 were calculated. Primary outcomes included mortality, need for intubation, and need for supplemental oxygen >6L during hospitalization. Secondary analysis assessed if any individual risk factors were associated with those outcomes. These systems were evaluated via area under the curve calculations. Two groups based on an outcome were compared using two-sample t-tests for continuous variables and Fisher’s exact tests for categorical variables. RESULTS: All three systems demonstrated some discriminative power for mortality (table 2), but not for oxygen and intubation requirements. There was statistically significant difference in age between survivors and deceased (table 3), and BMI for oxygen requirements (table 4). Other risk factors were not predictive of mortality or oxygen requirement. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: The MASS, OMASS, and UCH2021 score all had predictive power in determining in-hospital mortality, with moderate accuracy, however none were predictive of oxygen requirements. Age and BMI were also good predictors of mortality and oxygen requirements respectively. This study was completed prior to vaccine distribution in the US. Further studies would be helpful to assess if UCH2021 score has greater discriminative power in samples with vaccinated patients. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2022-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9752808/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.896 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Huang, Anderson
Dieckhaus, Kevin
Chirch, Lisa M
Bath, Roopjeet K
Abrantes-Figueiredo, Jessica
Onwochei, Jennifer
Holtzman, Assaf
Tailor, Neelam
Kuo, Chia-Ling
1055. Comparison of Scoring systems in Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized with COVID 19
title 1055. Comparison of Scoring systems in Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized with COVID 19
title_full 1055. Comparison of Scoring systems in Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized with COVID 19
title_fullStr 1055. Comparison of Scoring systems in Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized with COVID 19
title_full_unstemmed 1055. Comparison of Scoring systems in Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized with COVID 19
title_short 1055. Comparison of Scoring systems in Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized with COVID 19
title_sort 1055. comparison of scoring systems in predicting clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized with covid 19
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752808/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.896
work_keys_str_mv AT huanganderson 1055comparisonofscoringsystemsinpredictingclinicaloutcomesinpatientshospitalizedwithcovid19
AT dieckhauskevin 1055comparisonofscoringsystemsinpredictingclinicaloutcomesinpatientshospitalizedwithcovid19
AT chirchlisam 1055comparisonofscoringsystemsinpredictingclinicaloutcomesinpatientshospitalizedwithcovid19
AT bathroopjeetk 1055comparisonofscoringsystemsinpredictingclinicaloutcomesinpatientshospitalizedwithcovid19
AT abrantesfigueiredojessica 1055comparisonofscoringsystemsinpredictingclinicaloutcomesinpatientshospitalizedwithcovid19
AT onwocheijennifer 1055comparisonofscoringsystemsinpredictingclinicaloutcomesinpatientshospitalizedwithcovid19
AT holtzmanassaf 1055comparisonofscoringsystemsinpredictingclinicaloutcomesinpatientshospitalizedwithcovid19
AT tailorneelam 1055comparisonofscoringsystemsinpredictingclinicaloutcomesinpatientshospitalizedwithcovid19
AT kuochialing 1055comparisonofscoringsystemsinpredictingclinicaloutcomesinpatientshospitalizedwithcovid19