Cargando…
536. Evaluation of the Clinical Utility of Universal Polymerase Chain Reaction Testing
BACKGROUND: Despite advances in microbiologic techniques, for patients with complex infections it often remains a challenge to identify the causative infectious pathogen. Traditional cultures (Cx) may fail to grow microorganisms due to inadequate sampling, prior antibiotic use, or the inherent insen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752830/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.589 |
_version_ | 1784850824434810880 |
---|---|
author | Donkin, Joshua D Emery, Rebecca P Polega, James Behenna, Curtis J Caulfield, Adam J Simeunovic, Gordana |
author_facet | Donkin, Joshua D Emery, Rebecca P Polega, James Behenna, Curtis J Caulfield, Adam J Simeunovic, Gordana |
author_sort | Donkin, Joshua D |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Despite advances in microbiologic techniques, for patients with complex infections it often remains a challenge to identify the causative infectious pathogen. Traditional cultures (Cx) may fail to grow microorganisms due to inadequate sampling, prior antibiotic use, or the inherent insensitivity of culture methods for fastidious pathogens. Molecular tests allow for the detection of microbial nucleic acids directly from clinical specimens and do not require the presence of viable organisms for identification. Universal polymerase chain reaction testing (UPCR) is offered though the University of Washington Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology as a metagenomic approach using broad-range PCR primers followed by sequencing to hypothetically identify any pathogen present. The testing is composed of 3 separate tests for bacterial (BUPCR), fungal (FUPCR), and acid-fast (AFUPCR) organisms. The utility of UPCR has not been formally evaluated. Our objective is to describe the diagnostic utility of UPCR by comparing Cx and UPCR results, and their impact on management. [Figure: see text] METHODS: We retrospectively collected data on UPCR and culture results and changes in antimicrobial therapy based on UPCR results for all patients with at least 1 UPCR test done during the 2-year study period. RESULTS: 367 UPCR tests were performed over 24 months on 155 patients. From 367 tests, 119 were FUPCR, 111 AFUPCR, and 137 BUPCR. 32/155 (20.6%) patients had positive UPCR. 25/32 were BUPCR and 7/32 were FUPCR. No AFUPCR was positive. Positive UPCR results directed treatment in 5 patients: 4 patients had positive UPCR and negative culture, and 1 had both UPCR and Cx positive but for different organisms. In all 5 therapy was changed in favor of UPCR result. All 5 tests were BUPCR. Negative UPCR led to antimicrobial discontinuation in 3 patients. 11/155 (7.1%) patients had negative UPCR and positive Cx, 10 of which were BUPCR and 1 AFUPCR. These results did not change management. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: Based on the real-world experience, UPCR results have limited impact on antimicrobial management in our institution. Further studies may try to identify clinical scenarios where UPCR may be of better clinical utility. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9752830 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97528302022-12-16 536. Evaluation of the Clinical Utility of Universal Polymerase Chain Reaction Testing Donkin, Joshua D Emery, Rebecca P Polega, James Behenna, Curtis J Caulfield, Adam J Simeunovic, Gordana Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Despite advances in microbiologic techniques, for patients with complex infections it often remains a challenge to identify the causative infectious pathogen. Traditional cultures (Cx) may fail to grow microorganisms due to inadequate sampling, prior antibiotic use, or the inherent insensitivity of culture methods for fastidious pathogens. Molecular tests allow for the detection of microbial nucleic acids directly from clinical specimens and do not require the presence of viable organisms for identification. Universal polymerase chain reaction testing (UPCR) is offered though the University of Washington Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology as a metagenomic approach using broad-range PCR primers followed by sequencing to hypothetically identify any pathogen present. The testing is composed of 3 separate tests for bacterial (BUPCR), fungal (FUPCR), and acid-fast (AFUPCR) organisms. The utility of UPCR has not been formally evaluated. Our objective is to describe the diagnostic utility of UPCR by comparing Cx and UPCR results, and their impact on management. [Figure: see text] METHODS: We retrospectively collected data on UPCR and culture results and changes in antimicrobial therapy based on UPCR results for all patients with at least 1 UPCR test done during the 2-year study period. RESULTS: 367 UPCR tests were performed over 24 months on 155 patients. From 367 tests, 119 were FUPCR, 111 AFUPCR, and 137 BUPCR. 32/155 (20.6%) patients had positive UPCR. 25/32 were BUPCR and 7/32 were FUPCR. No AFUPCR was positive. Positive UPCR results directed treatment in 5 patients: 4 patients had positive UPCR and negative culture, and 1 had both UPCR and Cx positive but for different organisms. In all 5 therapy was changed in favor of UPCR result. All 5 tests were BUPCR. Negative UPCR led to antimicrobial discontinuation in 3 patients. 11/155 (7.1%) patients had negative UPCR and positive Cx, 10 of which were BUPCR and 1 AFUPCR. These results did not change management. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: Based on the real-world experience, UPCR results have limited impact on antimicrobial management in our institution. Further studies may try to identify clinical scenarios where UPCR may be of better clinical utility. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2022-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9752830/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.589 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Donkin, Joshua D Emery, Rebecca P Polega, James Behenna, Curtis J Caulfield, Adam J Simeunovic, Gordana 536. Evaluation of the Clinical Utility of Universal Polymerase Chain Reaction Testing |
title | 536. Evaluation of the Clinical Utility of Universal Polymerase Chain Reaction Testing |
title_full | 536. Evaluation of the Clinical Utility of Universal Polymerase Chain Reaction Testing |
title_fullStr | 536. Evaluation of the Clinical Utility of Universal Polymerase Chain Reaction Testing |
title_full_unstemmed | 536. Evaluation of the Clinical Utility of Universal Polymerase Chain Reaction Testing |
title_short | 536. Evaluation of the Clinical Utility of Universal Polymerase Chain Reaction Testing |
title_sort | 536. evaluation of the clinical utility of universal polymerase chain reaction testing |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752830/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.589 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT donkinjoshuad 536evaluationoftheclinicalutilityofuniversalpolymerasechainreactiontesting AT emeryrebeccap 536evaluationoftheclinicalutilityofuniversalpolymerasechainreactiontesting AT polegajames 536evaluationoftheclinicalutilityofuniversalpolymerasechainreactiontesting AT behennacurtisj 536evaluationoftheclinicalutilityofuniversalpolymerasechainreactiontesting AT caulfieldadamj 536evaluationoftheclinicalutilityofuniversalpolymerasechainreactiontesting AT simeunovicgordana 536evaluationoftheclinicalutilityofuniversalpolymerasechainreactiontesting |