Cargando…

291. Retrospective Study on Bacteremia in COVID-19 Patients in the Delta and Omicron Era

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak reached peak levels in South Korea as the Delta variant, dominant from late August until the end of 2021, was rapidly overtaken by the Omicron variant at the start of 2022. In studies conducted near the start of the pandemic, the occurrenc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Sunghee, Kim, Tark, Choo, Eun Ju
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752861/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.369
_version_ 1784850832602169344
author Park, Sunghee
Kim, Tark
Choo, Eun Ju
author_facet Park, Sunghee
Kim, Tark
Choo, Eun Ju
author_sort Park, Sunghee
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak reached peak levels in South Korea as the Delta variant, dominant from late August until the end of 2021, was rapidly overtaken by the Omicron variant at the start of 2022. In studies conducted near the start of the pandemic, the occurrence of bacteremia in COVID-19 patients was relatively low. We aimed to determine if there was a change in the rate of bacteremia in COVID-19 patients with the progression of the pandemic. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of patients who were diagnosed with COVID-19 at a referral hospital between September 2021 and March 2022. Blood culture results were recorded, along with demographic characteristics and clinical outcomes. Contamination was considered when a single blood culture was positive for coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), Corynebacterium species, or Bacillus species. Clinically relevant bacteremia was defined as bacteremia due to clinically significant pathogens between 7 days before COVID-19 diagnosis to 14 days after diagnosis. RESULTS: Among the 360 patients included in the study, 46 cases from 43 (11.9%) patients were considered to be clinically relevant bacteremia. Enterococcus faecalis (17.4%) and CoNS (17.4%) were the most common pathogens, followed by Acinetobacter baumannii (15.2%), Staphylococcus aureus (10.7%) and Escherichia coli (10.7%). The median number of days from COVID-19 diagnosis to identification of bacteremia was 2 days. There was no significant difference in the rate of bacteremia between the Delta (September-December 2021) and Omicron variant eras (January-March 2022) (12.2% vs. 11.7%, P = .88). In the subgroup analysis of patients who received more than 2 days of intensive care, there was no statistical difference in the rate of bacteremia (14.5% [9/62] in the Delta variant era vs. 16.9% [14/83] in the Omicron variant era; P = .70). Mortality was significantly higher in patients with clinically relevant bacteremia (48.8% vs. 19.2%, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Many COVID-19 patients had bacteremia in the Omicron variant era, especially in the intensive care unit. Clinicians should suspect bacterial co-infection when a COVID-19 patient is clinically aggravated. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9752861
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97528612022-12-16 291. Retrospective Study on Bacteremia in COVID-19 Patients in the Delta and Omicron Era Park, Sunghee Kim, Tark Choo, Eun Ju Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak reached peak levels in South Korea as the Delta variant, dominant from late August until the end of 2021, was rapidly overtaken by the Omicron variant at the start of 2022. In studies conducted near the start of the pandemic, the occurrence of bacteremia in COVID-19 patients was relatively low. We aimed to determine if there was a change in the rate of bacteremia in COVID-19 patients with the progression of the pandemic. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of patients who were diagnosed with COVID-19 at a referral hospital between September 2021 and March 2022. Blood culture results were recorded, along with demographic characteristics and clinical outcomes. Contamination was considered when a single blood culture was positive for coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), Corynebacterium species, or Bacillus species. Clinically relevant bacteremia was defined as bacteremia due to clinically significant pathogens between 7 days before COVID-19 diagnosis to 14 days after diagnosis. RESULTS: Among the 360 patients included in the study, 46 cases from 43 (11.9%) patients were considered to be clinically relevant bacteremia. Enterococcus faecalis (17.4%) and CoNS (17.4%) were the most common pathogens, followed by Acinetobacter baumannii (15.2%), Staphylococcus aureus (10.7%) and Escherichia coli (10.7%). The median number of days from COVID-19 diagnosis to identification of bacteremia was 2 days. There was no significant difference in the rate of bacteremia between the Delta (September-December 2021) and Omicron variant eras (January-March 2022) (12.2% vs. 11.7%, P = .88). In the subgroup analysis of patients who received more than 2 days of intensive care, there was no statistical difference in the rate of bacteremia (14.5% [9/62] in the Delta variant era vs. 16.9% [14/83] in the Omicron variant era; P = .70). Mortality was significantly higher in patients with clinically relevant bacteremia (48.8% vs. 19.2%, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Many COVID-19 patients had bacteremia in the Omicron variant era, especially in the intensive care unit. Clinicians should suspect bacterial co-infection when a COVID-19 patient is clinically aggravated. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2022-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9752861/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.369 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Park, Sunghee
Kim, Tark
Choo, Eun Ju
291. Retrospective Study on Bacteremia in COVID-19 Patients in the Delta and Omicron Era
title 291. Retrospective Study on Bacteremia in COVID-19 Patients in the Delta and Omicron Era
title_full 291. Retrospective Study on Bacteremia in COVID-19 Patients in the Delta and Omicron Era
title_fullStr 291. Retrospective Study on Bacteremia in COVID-19 Patients in the Delta and Omicron Era
title_full_unstemmed 291. Retrospective Study on Bacteremia in COVID-19 Patients in the Delta and Omicron Era
title_short 291. Retrospective Study on Bacteremia in COVID-19 Patients in the Delta and Omicron Era
title_sort 291. retrospective study on bacteremia in covid-19 patients in the delta and omicron era
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752861/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.369
work_keys_str_mv AT parksunghee 291retrospectivestudyonbacteremiaincovid19patientsinthedeltaandomicronera
AT kimtark 291retrospectivestudyonbacteremiaincovid19patientsinthedeltaandomicronera
AT chooeunju 291retrospectivestudyonbacteremiaincovid19patientsinthedeltaandomicronera