Cargando…

1795. Evaluation of Appropriate Daptomycin Usage in an Academic Medical Center

BACKGROUND: The usage of daptomycin at our institution has steadily increased, with a threefold increase from Jan 2020 to Jan 2022 according to Days of Therapy Data. The increased usage prompted this study to determine whether daptomycin use at our institution is appropriately indicated and supervis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Daoud, Nour A, VanNatta, Mollie, Koppada, Satya, Alam, Mohammad, Khan, Muhammad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752946/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.1425
_version_ 1784850854057082880
author Daoud, Nour A
VanNatta, Mollie
Koppada, Satya
Alam, Mohammad
Khan, Muhammad
author_facet Daoud, Nour A
VanNatta, Mollie
Koppada, Satya
Alam, Mohammad
Khan, Muhammad
author_sort Daoud, Nour A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The usage of daptomycin at our institution has steadily increased, with a threefold increase from Jan 2020 to Jan 2022 according to Days of Therapy Data. The increased usage prompted this study to determine whether daptomycin use at our institution is appropriately indicated and supervised by the infection disease service. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective descriptive study on 74 patients who were selected randomly from a total of 234 pts who received daptomycin at our facility in Northwest Louisiana over the past two years. We studied the patient's age and gender, type of infection, indications, empiric versus targeted therapy, culture results, infectious disease consultation, and reason for early discontinuation. RESULTS: Seventy-four pts were included in the analysis. The median age was 53.50 (22-90 yrs), and 47 pts (63.5%) were male. The most common infections were bone and joint (37, 50.7%), followed by bacteremia (22, 30.1%), followed by infective endocarditis (4, 5.5%). The infectious disease service was consulted before administration of daptomycin in 87.3% (62 patients). In 70.3% (52 patients), daptomycin was used as targeted therapy. MRSA was the most common bacteria for which daptomycin was used (29, 42.6%), followed by Enterococcus faecalis (10, 14.7%) and Coagulase-negative staphylococcus (8, 11.8%). Fifty-five pts (74.3%) received vancomycin before switching to daptomycin. The most common indications was MRSA with vancomycin MIC ≥ 2 mcg/ml (25, 33.8%), followed by as an alternative to vancomycin in acute renal failure (14, 18.9%), followed by clinical or/and microbiological failure on the previous antibiotic regimen (10, 13.5%). Thirty-six pts (48.6%) completed their course, 20 (27%) pts had early discontinuation, 11 pts (14.9%) were lost to follow-up, 4 pts (5.4%) were still on daptomycin at the time of data collection, and 3 pts (4.1%) died during hospitalization. The most common cause of early discontinuation was the culture growing pathogen necessitating discontinuation of daptomycin (7 patients, 35%), followed by insurance issues that account for 15%. CONCLUSION: Most daptomycin usage in our institution was wisely indicated under the supervision of the infectious disease service and was primarily used as targeted therapy. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9752946
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97529462022-12-16 1795. Evaluation of Appropriate Daptomycin Usage in an Academic Medical Center Daoud, Nour A VanNatta, Mollie Koppada, Satya Alam, Mohammad Khan, Muhammad Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: The usage of daptomycin at our institution has steadily increased, with a threefold increase from Jan 2020 to Jan 2022 according to Days of Therapy Data. The increased usage prompted this study to determine whether daptomycin use at our institution is appropriately indicated and supervised by the infection disease service. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective descriptive study on 74 patients who were selected randomly from a total of 234 pts who received daptomycin at our facility in Northwest Louisiana over the past two years. We studied the patient's age and gender, type of infection, indications, empiric versus targeted therapy, culture results, infectious disease consultation, and reason for early discontinuation. RESULTS: Seventy-four pts were included in the analysis. The median age was 53.50 (22-90 yrs), and 47 pts (63.5%) were male. The most common infections were bone and joint (37, 50.7%), followed by bacteremia (22, 30.1%), followed by infective endocarditis (4, 5.5%). The infectious disease service was consulted before administration of daptomycin in 87.3% (62 patients). In 70.3% (52 patients), daptomycin was used as targeted therapy. MRSA was the most common bacteria for which daptomycin was used (29, 42.6%), followed by Enterococcus faecalis (10, 14.7%) and Coagulase-negative staphylococcus (8, 11.8%). Fifty-five pts (74.3%) received vancomycin before switching to daptomycin. The most common indications was MRSA with vancomycin MIC ≥ 2 mcg/ml (25, 33.8%), followed by as an alternative to vancomycin in acute renal failure (14, 18.9%), followed by clinical or/and microbiological failure on the previous antibiotic regimen (10, 13.5%). Thirty-six pts (48.6%) completed their course, 20 (27%) pts had early discontinuation, 11 pts (14.9%) were lost to follow-up, 4 pts (5.4%) were still on daptomycin at the time of data collection, and 3 pts (4.1%) died during hospitalization. The most common cause of early discontinuation was the culture growing pathogen necessitating discontinuation of daptomycin (7 patients, 35%), followed by insurance issues that account for 15%. CONCLUSION: Most daptomycin usage in our institution was wisely indicated under the supervision of the infectious disease service and was primarily used as targeted therapy. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2022-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9752946/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.1425 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Daoud, Nour A
VanNatta, Mollie
Koppada, Satya
Alam, Mohammad
Khan, Muhammad
1795. Evaluation of Appropriate Daptomycin Usage in an Academic Medical Center
title 1795. Evaluation of Appropriate Daptomycin Usage in an Academic Medical Center
title_full 1795. Evaluation of Appropriate Daptomycin Usage in an Academic Medical Center
title_fullStr 1795. Evaluation of Appropriate Daptomycin Usage in an Academic Medical Center
title_full_unstemmed 1795. Evaluation of Appropriate Daptomycin Usage in an Academic Medical Center
title_short 1795. Evaluation of Appropriate Daptomycin Usage in an Academic Medical Center
title_sort 1795. evaluation of appropriate daptomycin usage in an academic medical center
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752946/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.1425
work_keys_str_mv AT daoudnoura 1795evaluationofappropriatedaptomycinusageinanacademicmedicalcenter
AT vannattamollie 1795evaluationofappropriatedaptomycinusageinanacademicmedicalcenter
AT koppadasatya 1795evaluationofappropriatedaptomycinusageinanacademicmedicalcenter
AT alammohammad 1795evaluationofappropriatedaptomycinusageinanacademicmedicalcenter
AT khanmuhammad 1795evaluationofappropriatedaptomycinusageinanacademicmedicalcenter