Cargando…
911. Impact of Intensified Clindamycin Stewardship Initiatives in Three Phases: A Quasi-Experimental Study
BACKGROUND: Clindamycin utilization has provoked gram-positive and anaerobic bacterial resistance and is associated with Clostridioides difficile infections (CDI). The purpose of this study was to evaluate if implementing local clindamycin-focused stewardship initiatives impacts clindamycin utilizat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752965/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.756 |
_version_ | 1784850858798743552 |
---|---|
author | Gamble, Kelly C Rose, Dusten T T Mondy, Kristin Thyagarajan, Rama Jaso, Theresa Coats, Leslie Reveles, Kelly R |
author_facet | Gamble, Kelly C Rose, Dusten T T Mondy, Kristin Thyagarajan, Rama Jaso, Theresa Coats, Leslie Reveles, Kelly R |
author_sort | Gamble, Kelly C |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Clindamycin utilization has provoked gram-positive and anaerobic bacterial resistance and is associated with Clostridioides difficile infections (CDI). The purpose of this study was to evaluate if implementing local clindamycin-focused stewardship initiatives impacts clindamycin utilization and outcome metrics. METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective quasi-experimental study was conducted in adult hospitalized patients who received clindamycin from 2018 to 2020. Outcomes were compared in three phases between an intervention and control group (Figure 1). The primary outcome was inappropriate utilization: a resistant pathogen, concurrent antibiotic(s) with pathogen activity, a non-necrotizing infection, an alternative agent was preferred, or alternative reasons per expert discretion. Secondary outcomes included clindamycin duration of therapy per 1000 patient hospital days (DOT/1000 PD), 30-day CDI, 30-day readmission, and in-hospital mortality. Outcomes were compared between groups using the chi-square, Fisher’s exact, or Kruskal-Wallis tests as appropriate. [Figure: see text] RESULTS: The study included 481 patients (Table 1). Inappropriate clindamycin use in the intervention group was highest in Phase 1 (94%), then decreased in Phase 2 (72%) and Phase 3 (74%) (p< 0.01). Comparing Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3 between the intervention and control groups, respectively, the primary outcome occurred in 94% vs 93% (p=0.80), 72% vs 88% (p=0.02), and 74% vs 89% (p=0.03). The DOT/1000 PD was 10 in Phase 1, 9.2 in Phase 2, and 6.2 in Phase 3. Initiatives were not associated with significant reductions in 30-day CDI (1% in Phase 1, 0% in Phase 2, 0% in Phase 3, p=0.64), 30-day readmission (18% in Phase 1, 31% in Phase 2, 22% in Phase 3, p=0.13), or in-hospital mortality (0% in Phase 1, 2% in Phase 2, 0% in Phase 3, p=0.33). [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: Clindamycin-focused stewardship initiatives reduced inappropriate prescribing patterns by approximately 20% but still remained high in Phase 3. Clindamycin was primarily ordered in the emergency department (ED). Additional initiatives may include formal criteria for use and removing clindamycin from automated dispensing cabinets in the ED. Our initiatives may serve as a model for other institutions to reduce clindamycin utilization and its associated complications. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9752965 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97529652022-12-16 911. Impact of Intensified Clindamycin Stewardship Initiatives in Three Phases: A Quasi-Experimental Study Gamble, Kelly C Rose, Dusten T T Mondy, Kristin Thyagarajan, Rama Jaso, Theresa Coats, Leslie Reveles, Kelly R Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Clindamycin utilization has provoked gram-positive and anaerobic bacterial resistance and is associated with Clostridioides difficile infections (CDI). The purpose of this study was to evaluate if implementing local clindamycin-focused stewardship initiatives impacts clindamycin utilization and outcome metrics. METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective quasi-experimental study was conducted in adult hospitalized patients who received clindamycin from 2018 to 2020. Outcomes were compared in three phases between an intervention and control group (Figure 1). The primary outcome was inappropriate utilization: a resistant pathogen, concurrent antibiotic(s) with pathogen activity, a non-necrotizing infection, an alternative agent was preferred, or alternative reasons per expert discretion. Secondary outcomes included clindamycin duration of therapy per 1000 patient hospital days (DOT/1000 PD), 30-day CDI, 30-day readmission, and in-hospital mortality. Outcomes were compared between groups using the chi-square, Fisher’s exact, or Kruskal-Wallis tests as appropriate. [Figure: see text] RESULTS: The study included 481 patients (Table 1). Inappropriate clindamycin use in the intervention group was highest in Phase 1 (94%), then decreased in Phase 2 (72%) and Phase 3 (74%) (p< 0.01). Comparing Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3 between the intervention and control groups, respectively, the primary outcome occurred in 94% vs 93% (p=0.80), 72% vs 88% (p=0.02), and 74% vs 89% (p=0.03). The DOT/1000 PD was 10 in Phase 1, 9.2 in Phase 2, and 6.2 in Phase 3. Initiatives were not associated with significant reductions in 30-day CDI (1% in Phase 1, 0% in Phase 2, 0% in Phase 3, p=0.64), 30-day readmission (18% in Phase 1, 31% in Phase 2, 22% in Phase 3, p=0.13), or in-hospital mortality (0% in Phase 1, 2% in Phase 2, 0% in Phase 3, p=0.33). [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: Clindamycin-focused stewardship initiatives reduced inappropriate prescribing patterns by approximately 20% but still remained high in Phase 3. Clindamycin was primarily ordered in the emergency department (ED). Additional initiatives may include formal criteria for use and removing clindamycin from automated dispensing cabinets in the ED. Our initiatives may serve as a model for other institutions to reduce clindamycin utilization and its associated complications. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2022-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9752965/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.756 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Gamble, Kelly C Rose, Dusten T T Mondy, Kristin Thyagarajan, Rama Jaso, Theresa Coats, Leslie Reveles, Kelly R 911. Impact of Intensified Clindamycin Stewardship Initiatives in Three Phases: A Quasi-Experimental Study |
title | 911. Impact of Intensified Clindamycin Stewardship Initiatives in Three Phases: A Quasi-Experimental Study |
title_full | 911. Impact of Intensified Clindamycin Stewardship Initiatives in Three Phases: A Quasi-Experimental Study |
title_fullStr | 911. Impact of Intensified Clindamycin Stewardship Initiatives in Three Phases: A Quasi-Experimental Study |
title_full_unstemmed | 911. Impact of Intensified Clindamycin Stewardship Initiatives in Three Phases: A Quasi-Experimental Study |
title_short | 911. Impact of Intensified Clindamycin Stewardship Initiatives in Three Phases: A Quasi-Experimental Study |
title_sort | 911. impact of intensified clindamycin stewardship initiatives in three phases: a quasi-experimental study |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9752965/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac492.756 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gamblekellyc 911impactofintensifiedclindamycinstewardshipinitiativesinthreephasesaquasiexperimentalstudy AT rosedustentt 911impactofintensifiedclindamycinstewardshipinitiativesinthreephasesaquasiexperimentalstudy AT mondykristin 911impactofintensifiedclindamycinstewardshipinitiativesinthreephasesaquasiexperimentalstudy AT thyagarajanrama 911impactofintensifiedclindamycinstewardshipinitiativesinthreephasesaquasiexperimentalstudy AT jasotheresa 911impactofintensifiedclindamycinstewardshipinitiativesinthreephasesaquasiexperimentalstudy AT coatsleslie 911impactofintensifiedclindamycinstewardshipinitiativesinthreephasesaquasiexperimentalstudy AT reveleskellyr 911impactofintensifiedclindamycinstewardshipinitiativesinthreephasesaquasiexperimentalstudy |