Cargando…
The effect of posture on airflow distribution, airway geometry and air velocity in healthy subjects
BACKGROUND: Gravity, and thus body position, can affect the regional distribution of lung ventilation and blood flow. Therefore, body positioning is a potential tool to improve regional ventilation, thereby possibly enhancing the effect of respiratory physiotherapy interventions. In this proof-of-co...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9753395/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36522658 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-022-02276-5 |
_version_ | 1784850954849353728 |
---|---|
author | Ides, Kris M. De Backer, Wilfried A. Lanclus, Maarten Leemans, Glenn Dierckx, Wendel Lauwers, Eline Vissers, Dirk Steckel, Jan De Backer, Jan W. |
author_facet | Ides, Kris M. De Backer, Wilfried A. Lanclus, Maarten Leemans, Glenn Dierckx, Wendel Lauwers, Eline Vissers, Dirk Steckel, Jan De Backer, Jan W. |
author_sort | Ides, Kris M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Gravity, and thus body position, can affect the regional distribution of lung ventilation and blood flow. Therefore, body positioning is a potential tool to improve regional ventilation, thereby possibly enhancing the effect of respiratory physiotherapy interventions. In this proof-of-concept study, functional respiratory imaging (FRI) was used to objectively assess effects of body position on regional airflow distribution in the lungs. METHODS: Five healthy volunteers were recruited. The participants were asked during FRI first to lie in supine position, afterwards in standardized right lateral position. RESULTS: In right lateral position there was significantly more regional ventilation also described as Imaging Airflow Distribution in the right lung than in the left lung (P < 0.001). Air velocity was significantly higher in the left lung (P < 0.05). In right lateral position there was significantly more airflow distribution in the right lung than in the left lung (P < 0.001). Significant changes were observed in airway geometry resulting in a decrease in imaged airway volume (P = 0.024) and a higher imaged airway resistance (P = 0.029) in the dependent lung. In general, the effect of right lateral position caused a significant increase in regional ventilation (P < 0.001) in the dependent lung when compared with the supine position. CONCLUSIONS: Changing body position leads to significant changes in regional lung ventilation, objectively assessed by FRI The volume based on the imaging parameters in the dependent lung is smaller in the lateral position than in the supine position. In right lateral decubitus position, airflow distribution is greater in dependent lung compared to the nondependent lung. Trial registration: The trial has been submitted to www.clinicaltrials.gov with identification number NCT01893697 on 07/02/2013. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12890-022-02276-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9753395 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97533952022-12-16 The effect of posture on airflow distribution, airway geometry and air velocity in healthy subjects Ides, Kris M. De Backer, Wilfried A. Lanclus, Maarten Leemans, Glenn Dierckx, Wendel Lauwers, Eline Vissers, Dirk Steckel, Jan De Backer, Jan W. BMC Pulm Med Research BACKGROUND: Gravity, and thus body position, can affect the regional distribution of lung ventilation and blood flow. Therefore, body positioning is a potential tool to improve regional ventilation, thereby possibly enhancing the effect of respiratory physiotherapy interventions. In this proof-of-concept study, functional respiratory imaging (FRI) was used to objectively assess effects of body position on regional airflow distribution in the lungs. METHODS: Five healthy volunteers were recruited. The participants were asked during FRI first to lie in supine position, afterwards in standardized right lateral position. RESULTS: In right lateral position there was significantly more regional ventilation also described as Imaging Airflow Distribution in the right lung than in the left lung (P < 0.001). Air velocity was significantly higher in the left lung (P < 0.05). In right lateral position there was significantly more airflow distribution in the right lung than in the left lung (P < 0.001). Significant changes were observed in airway geometry resulting in a decrease in imaged airway volume (P = 0.024) and a higher imaged airway resistance (P = 0.029) in the dependent lung. In general, the effect of right lateral position caused a significant increase in regional ventilation (P < 0.001) in the dependent lung when compared with the supine position. CONCLUSIONS: Changing body position leads to significant changes in regional lung ventilation, objectively assessed by FRI The volume based on the imaging parameters in the dependent lung is smaller in the lateral position than in the supine position. In right lateral decubitus position, airflow distribution is greater in dependent lung compared to the nondependent lung. Trial registration: The trial has been submitted to www.clinicaltrials.gov with identification number NCT01893697 on 07/02/2013. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12890-022-02276-5. BioMed Central 2022-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9753395/ /pubmed/36522658 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-022-02276-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Ides, Kris M. De Backer, Wilfried A. Lanclus, Maarten Leemans, Glenn Dierckx, Wendel Lauwers, Eline Vissers, Dirk Steckel, Jan De Backer, Jan W. The effect of posture on airflow distribution, airway geometry and air velocity in healthy subjects |
title | The effect of posture on airflow distribution, airway geometry and air velocity in healthy subjects |
title_full | The effect of posture on airflow distribution, airway geometry and air velocity in healthy subjects |
title_fullStr | The effect of posture on airflow distribution, airway geometry and air velocity in healthy subjects |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of posture on airflow distribution, airway geometry and air velocity in healthy subjects |
title_short | The effect of posture on airflow distribution, airway geometry and air velocity in healthy subjects |
title_sort | effect of posture on airflow distribution, airway geometry and air velocity in healthy subjects |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9753395/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36522658 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-022-02276-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ideskrism theeffectofpostureonairflowdistributionairwaygeometryandairvelocityinhealthysubjects AT debackerwilfrieda theeffectofpostureonairflowdistributionairwaygeometryandairvelocityinhealthysubjects AT lanclusmaarten theeffectofpostureonairflowdistributionairwaygeometryandairvelocityinhealthysubjects AT leemansglenn theeffectofpostureonairflowdistributionairwaygeometryandairvelocityinhealthysubjects AT dierckxwendel theeffectofpostureonairflowdistributionairwaygeometryandairvelocityinhealthysubjects AT lauwerseline theeffectofpostureonairflowdistributionairwaygeometryandairvelocityinhealthysubjects AT vissersdirk theeffectofpostureonairflowdistributionairwaygeometryandairvelocityinhealthysubjects AT steckeljan theeffectofpostureonairflowdistributionairwaygeometryandairvelocityinhealthysubjects AT debackerjanw theeffectofpostureonairflowdistributionairwaygeometryandairvelocityinhealthysubjects AT ideskrism effectofpostureonairflowdistributionairwaygeometryandairvelocityinhealthysubjects AT debackerwilfrieda effectofpostureonairflowdistributionairwaygeometryandairvelocityinhealthysubjects AT lanclusmaarten effectofpostureonairflowdistributionairwaygeometryandairvelocityinhealthysubjects AT leemansglenn effectofpostureonairflowdistributionairwaygeometryandairvelocityinhealthysubjects AT dierckxwendel effectofpostureonairflowdistributionairwaygeometryandairvelocityinhealthysubjects AT lauwerseline effectofpostureonairflowdistributionairwaygeometryandairvelocityinhealthysubjects AT vissersdirk effectofpostureonairflowdistributionairwaygeometryandairvelocityinhealthysubjects AT steckeljan effectofpostureonairflowdistributionairwaygeometryandairvelocityinhealthysubjects AT debackerjanw effectofpostureonairflowdistributionairwaygeometryandairvelocityinhealthysubjects |