Cargando…

Dosimetric evaluation of bone marrow sparing in proton radiotherapy for cervical cancer guided by MR functional imaging

BACKGROUND: To segment the pelvic active bone marrow (PABM) using magnetic resonance (MR) functional imaging and investigate the feasibility and dosimetric characteristics of cervical cancer proton radiotherapy for active bone marrow (ABM) sparing. METHODS: We collected CT and MR simulation images o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qin, Xiaohang, Gong, Guanzhong, Wang, Lizhen, Su, Ya, Yin, Yong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9753489/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36517839
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-022-02175-3
_version_ 1784850973826482176
author Qin, Xiaohang
Gong, Guanzhong
Wang, Lizhen
Su, Ya
Yin, Yong
author_facet Qin, Xiaohang
Gong, Guanzhong
Wang, Lizhen
Su, Ya
Yin, Yong
author_sort Qin, Xiaohang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To segment the pelvic active bone marrow (PABM) using magnetic resonance (MR) functional imaging and investigate the feasibility and dosimetric characteristics of cervical cancer proton radiotherapy for active bone marrow (ABM) sparing. METHODS: We collected CT and MR simulation images of 33 patients with cervical cancer retrospectively. The PBM was contoured on the MRI FatFrac images; the PBM was divided into high-active bone marrow (ABM-(high)) and low-active bone marrow based on the fat content of the PBM. Four radiotherapy plans were created for each patient, which included intensity-modulated photon therapy (IMRT), bone marrow sparing IMRT (IMRT-BMS), intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT), and bone marrow sparing IMPT (IMPT-BMS). The dosimetric differences among the four plans were compared. RESULTS: The ABM-(high) volume in the enrolled patients accounted for 45.2% of the total ABM volume. The target coverage was similar among the four radiotherapy plans. IMRT-BMS, IMPT, and IMPT-BMS reduced the D(mean) of ABM-(high) by 16.6%, 14.2%, and 44.5%, respectively, compared to the D(mean) of IMRT (p < 0.05). IMPT-BMS had the best protective effect on the bone marrow. Compared to IMRT, the volume of ABM-(high) receiving an irradiation dose of 5–40 Gy decreased by 10.2%, 36.8%, 58.8%, 67.4%, 64.9%, and 44.5%, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The MR functional imaging technique helped in the grading and segmentation of PABM. MR functional image-guided proton radiotherapy for cervical cancer can achieve optimal BMS. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-022-02175-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9753489
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97534892022-12-16 Dosimetric evaluation of bone marrow sparing in proton radiotherapy for cervical cancer guided by MR functional imaging Qin, Xiaohang Gong, Guanzhong Wang, Lizhen Su, Ya Yin, Yong Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: To segment the pelvic active bone marrow (PABM) using magnetic resonance (MR) functional imaging and investigate the feasibility and dosimetric characteristics of cervical cancer proton radiotherapy for active bone marrow (ABM) sparing. METHODS: We collected CT and MR simulation images of 33 patients with cervical cancer retrospectively. The PBM was contoured on the MRI FatFrac images; the PBM was divided into high-active bone marrow (ABM-(high)) and low-active bone marrow based on the fat content of the PBM. Four radiotherapy plans were created for each patient, which included intensity-modulated photon therapy (IMRT), bone marrow sparing IMRT (IMRT-BMS), intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT), and bone marrow sparing IMPT (IMPT-BMS). The dosimetric differences among the four plans were compared. RESULTS: The ABM-(high) volume in the enrolled patients accounted for 45.2% of the total ABM volume. The target coverage was similar among the four radiotherapy plans. IMRT-BMS, IMPT, and IMPT-BMS reduced the D(mean) of ABM-(high) by 16.6%, 14.2%, and 44.5%, respectively, compared to the D(mean) of IMRT (p < 0.05). IMPT-BMS had the best protective effect on the bone marrow. Compared to IMRT, the volume of ABM-(high) receiving an irradiation dose of 5–40 Gy decreased by 10.2%, 36.8%, 58.8%, 67.4%, 64.9%, and 44.5%, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The MR functional imaging technique helped in the grading and segmentation of PABM. MR functional image-guided proton radiotherapy for cervical cancer can achieve optimal BMS. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-022-02175-3. BioMed Central 2022-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9753489/ /pubmed/36517839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-022-02175-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Qin, Xiaohang
Gong, Guanzhong
Wang, Lizhen
Su, Ya
Yin, Yong
Dosimetric evaluation of bone marrow sparing in proton radiotherapy for cervical cancer guided by MR functional imaging
title Dosimetric evaluation of bone marrow sparing in proton radiotherapy for cervical cancer guided by MR functional imaging
title_full Dosimetric evaluation of bone marrow sparing in proton radiotherapy for cervical cancer guided by MR functional imaging
title_fullStr Dosimetric evaluation of bone marrow sparing in proton radiotherapy for cervical cancer guided by MR functional imaging
title_full_unstemmed Dosimetric evaluation of bone marrow sparing in proton radiotherapy for cervical cancer guided by MR functional imaging
title_short Dosimetric evaluation of bone marrow sparing in proton radiotherapy for cervical cancer guided by MR functional imaging
title_sort dosimetric evaluation of bone marrow sparing in proton radiotherapy for cervical cancer guided by mr functional imaging
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9753489/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36517839
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-022-02175-3
work_keys_str_mv AT qinxiaohang dosimetricevaluationofbonemarrowsparinginprotonradiotherapyforcervicalcancerguidedbymrfunctionalimaging
AT gongguanzhong dosimetricevaluationofbonemarrowsparinginprotonradiotherapyforcervicalcancerguidedbymrfunctionalimaging
AT wanglizhen dosimetricevaluationofbonemarrowsparinginprotonradiotherapyforcervicalcancerguidedbymrfunctionalimaging
AT suya dosimetricevaluationofbonemarrowsparinginprotonradiotherapyforcervicalcancerguidedbymrfunctionalimaging
AT yinyong dosimetricevaluationofbonemarrowsparinginprotonradiotherapyforcervicalcancerguidedbymrfunctionalimaging