Cargando…

A Comparison of Online and In-Person Evolution Instruction That Includes Religious Cultural Competence

Evolution is one of the most important concepts in biology, but it is rejected by a substantial percentage of religious students due to a perceived conflict with their religious beliefs. The use of religious cultural competence in evolution education (ReCCEE) has been shown to effectively increase e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bowen, Chloe D., Summersill, Alexa R., Jensen, Jamie L., Brownell, Sara E., Barnes, M. Elizabeth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9753654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36532227
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00067-22
_version_ 1784851011235479552
author Bowen, Chloe D.
Summersill, Alexa R.
Jensen, Jamie L.
Brownell, Sara E.
Barnes, M. Elizabeth
author_facet Bowen, Chloe D.
Summersill, Alexa R.
Jensen, Jamie L.
Brownell, Sara E.
Barnes, M. Elizabeth
author_sort Bowen, Chloe D.
collection PubMed
description Evolution is one of the most important concepts in biology, but it is rejected by a substantial percentage of religious students due to a perceived conflict with their religious beliefs. The use of religious cultural competence in evolution education (ReCCEE) has been shown to effectively increase evolution acceptance among religious students during in-person instruction, but there is no research that we know of that indicates the effectiveness of these practices during online instruction. In this study, we explored the efficacy of online culturally competent practices for religious students on students’ evolution understanding, evolution acceptance, and comfort learning evolution at a religious university. Before and after evolution instruction, we surveyed 178 students in online introductory biology courses and compared these student outcomes to 201 students in the same instructor’s in-person introductory biology courses. We found that evolution acceptance and understanding increased in online classes with culturally competent practices, and these gains were similar to those observed in the in-person courses. Despite these similarities, we found that students were more comfortable learning evolution in person than online, but this difference was small. Our findings suggest that the use of culturally competent practices online can be as effective as their use for in-person instruction for improving students' attitudes toward evolution, but in-person instruction may be more effective for cultivating students’ comfort while learning evolution.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9753654
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97536542022-12-16 A Comparison of Online and In-Person Evolution Instruction That Includes Religious Cultural Competence Bowen, Chloe D. Summersill, Alexa R. Jensen, Jamie L. Brownell, Sara E. Barnes, M. Elizabeth J Microbiol Biol Educ Research Article Evolution is one of the most important concepts in biology, but it is rejected by a substantial percentage of religious students due to a perceived conflict with their religious beliefs. The use of religious cultural competence in evolution education (ReCCEE) has been shown to effectively increase evolution acceptance among religious students during in-person instruction, but there is no research that we know of that indicates the effectiveness of these practices during online instruction. In this study, we explored the efficacy of online culturally competent practices for religious students on students’ evolution understanding, evolution acceptance, and comfort learning evolution at a religious university. Before and after evolution instruction, we surveyed 178 students in online introductory biology courses and compared these student outcomes to 201 students in the same instructor’s in-person introductory biology courses. We found that evolution acceptance and understanding increased in online classes with culturally competent practices, and these gains were similar to those observed in the in-person courses. Despite these similarities, we found that students were more comfortable learning evolution in person than online, but this difference was small. Our findings suggest that the use of culturally competent practices online can be as effective as their use for in-person instruction for improving students' attitudes toward evolution, but in-person instruction may be more effective for cultivating students’ comfort while learning evolution. American Society for Microbiology 2022-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9753654/ /pubmed/36532227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00067-22 Text en Copyright © 2022 Bowen et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Bowen, Chloe D.
Summersill, Alexa R.
Jensen, Jamie L.
Brownell, Sara E.
Barnes, M. Elizabeth
A Comparison of Online and In-Person Evolution Instruction That Includes Religious Cultural Competence
title A Comparison of Online and In-Person Evolution Instruction That Includes Religious Cultural Competence
title_full A Comparison of Online and In-Person Evolution Instruction That Includes Religious Cultural Competence
title_fullStr A Comparison of Online and In-Person Evolution Instruction That Includes Religious Cultural Competence
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Online and In-Person Evolution Instruction That Includes Religious Cultural Competence
title_short A Comparison of Online and In-Person Evolution Instruction That Includes Religious Cultural Competence
title_sort comparison of online and in-person evolution instruction that includes religious cultural competence
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9753654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36532227
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00067-22
work_keys_str_mv AT bowenchloed acomparisonofonlineandinpersonevolutioninstructionthatincludesreligiousculturalcompetence
AT summersillalexar acomparisonofonlineandinpersonevolutioninstructionthatincludesreligiousculturalcompetence
AT jensenjamiel acomparisonofonlineandinpersonevolutioninstructionthatincludesreligiousculturalcompetence
AT brownellsarae acomparisonofonlineandinpersonevolutioninstructionthatincludesreligiousculturalcompetence
AT barnesmelizabeth acomparisonofonlineandinpersonevolutioninstructionthatincludesreligiousculturalcompetence
AT bowenchloed comparisonofonlineandinpersonevolutioninstructionthatincludesreligiousculturalcompetence
AT summersillalexar comparisonofonlineandinpersonevolutioninstructionthatincludesreligiousculturalcompetence
AT jensenjamiel comparisonofonlineandinpersonevolutioninstructionthatincludesreligiousculturalcompetence
AT brownellsarae comparisonofonlineandinpersonevolutioninstructionthatincludesreligiousculturalcompetence
AT barnesmelizabeth comparisonofonlineandinpersonevolutioninstructionthatincludesreligiousculturalcompetence